America once had a government system so small it was barely identifiable, now has one of the biggest governments in the world. Its citizens are no longer free, but slaves to a corporate run government. The masters have become the slaves to a ruling class of elites. Though the change was in place prior to 1913, the privatizing of the currency to a globalist monopoly ended the origins of this nation, and through careful manipulation of language the masses live under an illusion of freedom. A term which today means one group's thought(s) must force others to submit and abandon theirs. This is not subject only to liberals, though they are the kings of character defamation, their preferred tactic for lack of logic and morals, but "conservatives" (the majority of which are national socialists without even knowing it) preaching law through morality, patriotism, war, and less taxes (less theft is somehow more noble and moral). If someone wants something these moral Nazis don't agree with, prostitution - a profession in which a person uses their own possession for profit, or prohibition which states owning or distribution of a plant is illegal.... how can you trust God if you make nature illegal... paranoid much... I say while we're at it we outlaw fruit bearing trees because of the Garden of Eden scandal. So, statists of all kinds wish to elect, through their majority rule mentality, people into power to rob you of your rights. SJW's push their fucking bullshit censorship under the disguise of political correctness and trigger warnings (seems like another way to go after guns if you ask me. Trigger warning vilifies a piece of a tool. It's like saying you're about to get shot with words. It implies what is about to be said will harm you in some way. Hey, sticks and stones you libtard pussies.) trying to manipulate and control you through their feelings, and when you refuse they call you racists, bigots, sexists, or any amount of ists in the attempt to silence you. Moral Nazis on the other hand try to police your actions, gay marriage is wrong, anal sex is wrong, drugs are wrong, nudity is wrong, drinking on Sunday is wrong, sex for money is wrong (it's somehow morally superior to be a slut rather than a whore), and if you don't like their moral damnation they want government to kidnap you at gunpoint and throw you in a cage. It strikes me odd that it's so socially acceptable to argue which statist views are more moral or principled when both strike me as morally bankrupt. How is robbing people of life, liberty, and property because you personally disagree with them moral or principled in any way? Under the Nonagression Principle, NAP, you may not rob anybody of life, liberty, and property. If you disregard NAP, then you are dealt with in a manner that matches your crime against another's life liberty and property. It's complete liberty and equality across the board. No elected criminal is above the law forcing their will on you at the threat of harming you in some way. I guess the concept seems radical to those that need a state to breast feed them all their life. Enjoy the oppression you subject us all to.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!