If you work the land with tools and in a certain way then you don't own the land because it was all acquired from various tools, and techniques, so the fruits of your labor don't belong to you.

So did anyone Own any thought, was there any Creative Singular Spark, or was it all "Interpretations that you do not own, because they are on things that are from your specific views and other things".

Thoughts are Just (honest, righteous, decent, honorable) someone's point of view based on one's education social, cultural views.

In short Thoughts are Someone's Point of view, and that doesn't mean that they are their own point of view or that they own that point of view, they are wholly owned by "education", so whatever you learn you don't OWN, you don't own your knowledge because it's all "borrowed", but in actuality it's no more borrowed then any tool which you own is "borrowed" because it uses the same universal design, the same principles as the tools before it. You posses both the Ideas, and the Things, they are yours and you can do with them as you wish, as long as you don't use your tools to harm anyone or use ideas to deceive or mislead or confuse or any such dishonorable things.

All Ideas are but Abstract Tools. Ideas are owned the moment someone Sees, Hears or otherwise Knows about the idea and if someone understands the use for it they can improve on it freely, and in a real sense of Posses, That is what Owning means, people think it's exclusivity or a condition of "stealing" or some call it "borrowing" but neither are you, I, or anyone forced to give tribute to ANYONE for ANYTHING, especially ideas, as you wouldn't pay tribute to anyone for using a cup, or a spoon, or any other implement, and neither are you bound to abstain from using something simply because someone else claims exclusivity over such Abstractions, as claiming such is the recent exact exemplary equivalent of those seeking exclusivity over Mathematical Functions by Patenting them, which in a Legal way is fine, but in a lawful way what jury of your own would find you guilty of "stealing/borrowing" ideas?

There is no greater absurdity than to make and enforce such tyrannical demands which contradict free will, which is essentially threatening people for encroaching over some monopolized, exclusive ownership over Abstractions, something that Harms nobody as it is wholly without Existence, but could be endlessly detrimental to everybody should the monopolized exclusive ownership for example be over the exclusivity of interplanetary travel, zero-point/free-energy, zero-g/anti-g, and in the realm of actual thuggery over ownership of ideas, as there is no tighter lid than the control over the future of the industrial military complex who with the Counter Operations (cia.nsa.nro.THEPRIVATESECTOR) and NASA are complicit in the biggest crime against humanity in the context of the LOST-POTENTIAL.

We are not going to be free until we are allowed to pursue such ends freely and those that do can freely exchange their ideas, until then there are those that have the means, and those that aren't even allowed to talk about the means all because exclusivity is tightly gripped in the blood soaked hands of psychopaths, and from my point of view, the talk about "you don't own your ideas" is an attempt to demoralize people from using anything that they didn't create in some complete novelty in any and all aspects, unprecedented idea. It's a cake of absurdities, layered generously and stacked in many tiers, a demoralizing mind virus to cause people to stupor and contemplate the malignant banality of "it's equivocation that ownership of your body doesn't mean you own your body" which rests in a conclusive contradiction that can neither define up nor down regardless of it's unfounded, baseless claims of equivocation, and which if it would hold some consistency could actually pass for the sense of a 6 year old, or realizing what ownership is. The conversation about copyright is equally one about Enforcement and nothing else. Until you realize that copyrights rest at the tip of extortion and threats you will resort to those methods to enact your visions and be very much part of the problem. Hence Open Source, hence steem, and hence owning Steem.

Some might argue that it's contradictory but it really isn't, dan, the creator has wrote on copyright and patents and many here hold the same view, so people are free to copyright their work, but ultimately it's a matter of how and what can you do to enforce it, which is essentially a battle on philosophical and logical grounds upon which copyright has neither a sliver for footing nor a hair to clasp onto, because force is abdication of free will, the oldest of laws, and exclusivity is abdication of golden rule/love thy neighbor as thyself, which is why a lot of people don't agree with copyright and why freeware and open source widely is justly filled with.