RE: Response: Wouldn't Warlords Take Over

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Response: Wouldn't Warlords Take Over

in anarchy •  8 years ago 

We already have warlords dumbass. What do you think politicians are? It's really hard to control people who have been raised to believe in self-ownership. Good luck running an army to forcefully control people when you have zero tax dollars to pay them. No black market means no drug lords either. The only thing they're going to get paid in is bullets flying at them.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

As usual, this statist author is completely blind to the current reality, eh? What is the functional difference between a "warlord" and a "state"? NOTHING, except PERCEPTION. This is just one more stupid thing statists say...like these:

https://steemit.com/anarchism/@kingkrawdad/stupid-shit-statists-say-a-collaborative-effort