Gray Areas in the NAP? (Is Voluntaryism a Utopian Philosophy?)

in anarchy •  7 years ago  (edited)

A video for those who think market anarchists (Voluntaryists) are "pie-in-the-sky" dreamers. Talking about gray areas, and how, though problems would still exist, they would, by necessity, be infinitely less in independent societies/communities based on the nature-conferred, objective reality of individual self-ownership than in a society (current state) based on the legitimization of violent force.


~KafkA

IMG_6356.jpg


Graham Smith is a Voluntaryist activist, creator, and peaceful parent residing in Niigata City, Japan. Graham runs the "Voluntary Japan" online initiative with a presence here on Steem, as well as Facebook and Twitter. (Hit me up so I can stop talking about myself in the third person!)

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Great video. Of course issues brought up by Statists about the issues with a voluntary society would affect a smaller percentage of the population than these issues arising under a society based on force. This simple point is too much of a leap for some. Trusting a centralized power center run by violent humans? Not a leap too far...

You said it, @chieppa1!

Anarchy has gotten a bad rep.
True anarchism is based on decentralized, contractual governance.
Submitted a piece on it just recently in the context of Steemit, if of interest:

Steemit Is Anarchy - Anarchy Is A Good Thing.


I recommend a good read:
VoluntayCityCoverFront.JPG


VoluntayCityCoverBack.JPG


-ch @globocop

Very interesting, I have always thought of the hypocrisy of the basic principles of the law, as stated in your video, you can get away with shooting a toddler that has set foot on your land, which goes to show just how the loopholes in the justice system can be used to get away with the most messed up things. Thank you for the time you have put into this video, really opened my eyes to the positives of anarchism and again as said in the video there is always going to be evil no matter how much effort we put into destroying it what we can do however is minimize that evil.

Upvoted and RESTEEMED!

That was a great speech man! I wish I could speak like that. At least I'm trying my best, so yesterday I posted an article similar to this one to explain how 'welfare' would work a libertarian society:

Without government, who will take care of the misfortunate?

Cheers!

Good stuff! Just read it!

Great! I hope you enjoyed my post.

Interesting thoughts, thanks

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Interesting thanks for sharing your thoughts!

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

The problem is the way I see it, there are to many people that are inherently lazy and don't want to do what you are willing to do to get what you want. But because most people want what you have worked hard for but are to scared to take it from you, they elect criminal thugs to do it for them. Interesting video, thanks for sharing.

Bunch of spineless millennials I reckon.

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment

Like any ideology Devine principles require force when faced with mob mentality ! That's why people like Ghandi was pro gun and believed in right to self defense ! I think everything is a question of civility & self control ! Let's face it some just don't have it ! I like the concept of idealism / anarchy but like all freedoms you have to fight for it

Good video, I still feel this sounds like Tribalism and Honour societies. How do you think it would differ and by what mechanism?

Aaaaawwwwsome, cooool and spendid please upvote me too

nice post thanks for shearing

Nice post

nice video

nice

Amazing video!
It´s allways good to know about this things!
Resteemed this is pure gold, thanks for sharing!
Im following you !

Great video man :)

nice keep it up

Nice

Thanks for sharing.

I think intent is a key element here. The hypothetical trespassing toddler is not intending to cause the property owner any harm; most likely they do not yet understand the concept of property boundaries. Similarly, an adult who trips on the sidewalk and falls into someone else's property is not intending to trespass either, even if they do understand the concept. In both cases, violence and threats are not justified by the NAP, in my opinion.

saya sangat suka post anda mudah mudah mudahan anda mendapat kan percapaian seperti yang anda harap kan.lihat juga post saya mungkin anda menyukainya dan tolong juga mengevote atau membagikan post saya.bantuan yang anda berika sangat saya hargai.semoga anda selalu sukses dan mendapat apa yang anda harap kan di steem.terimakasih untuk anda saya ucapkan

Sorry man, can't understand a lick.

I somehow knew what this would say before I translated it.
I really like your post easy hopefully you got the right percapaian as you please.see also the post I maybe you like it and please also mengevote or share post of me.the help you give I appreciate.may you always be successful and get what you please, right in steem.thank you, to you I say

Haai friend. . Upvote me help.

That's nice video. :)

Me...Michael....Vsauce here, is it you in the video ﴾͡๏̯͡๏﴿?

hello,like and voted

interesting video

Here's the solution to a voluntary capitalist society. A socialized non-debt currency issued equally to all at creation. At the present time currency is issued via a pyramid scheme created via debt. This would do two things: It would end the massive dysfunctional welfare model. It would ensure ALL people have equal opportunity to become the best they could be.
Of course, it is more complicated than this, but this would be the necessary foundation for such a society; at least one with greater span......

dope stuff!

  ·  7 years ago Reveal Comment