Stretching the statement that “the value of this art is solely in the knowledge of it” suggests a social context more relevant than simply relating the knot to capital.
The capital needed for the current vogue of engineering-intensive mega-art calls to mind more the supply chain applications that blockchains address than cryptocurrency. Simply being imaginative about what is necessary to represent art, in the context of supply chain, may carry a message more aligned to making choices empathetic with today's thinking than art has been representing in these left over objectives of the last century.
The idea of a plan being valuable is already much more logical to thought leaders than the risk of having the costs of non-performing assets. Anyway, as soon as big data feeds supply chain blockchains on a competitive level this will become normal practice, ending up making knowledge security completely moot, and the old investment protocols along with it.
So the knot is both a prototype of what is soon to be accepted reality, and a logical way to understand this reality.
Pictured here is a combination of two four crossing knots and two three crossing knots. The grid that identifies this unique knot has the value of modules 27, 28, 29, and 30 in the Cryptoknot protocol. Those tokenized numbers will never be associated with any other entity but the immutable combination of two four crossing with two three crossing knots.
Think of this as a plan with an infinite number of possibilities, all under one immutable identity, like the imprimatur of a unique mind.
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!