Canada needs a law protecting Indigenous art from appropriation ...

in art •  8 years ago  (edited)

https://ricochet.media/en/1808/canada-needs-a-law-protecting-indigenous-art-from-appropriation
The U.S. and Australia have legislation protecting Indigenous art forms and symbols, so why not follow their lead?

Normal Morrisseau's Art:


"Man Changing into Thunderbird"


Thunderbird | Shamanistic Art


TransMigration


The Great Flood


Kaha:wi Dance


A Separate Reality

As you can see this Woodland art originated by Norval Morrisseau is an integral part of his indigenous culture, depicting it's cultural heritage, stories and spiritual beliefs. It is not art for art's sake as Western culture understands art; that is really used for bartering and profit, especially in our century. So a young chippy with little depth and understanding of these beliefs and symbols chooses to plagiarize them and then calls it free expression is basically undermining and humiliating the indigenous culture, whose art is not made for profit but as an expression of their spiritual inner lives and traditions.

" Indigenous artists aren’t playing by the rules defined by Western European art traditions. In honour of Norval Morrisseau — especially in honour of this Anishinabe giant — they have shut down non-Indigenous folks such as PL who think it’s okay to appropriate his style for profit."

Indigenous art deserves to be produced and propagated by Indigenous artists, not by privileged wealthy young , mindless western twits...(I guess my bias is showing). I met Norval Morrisseau during one of his exhibitions and felt for him, as he was also exploited by the Western galleries...but interesting enough in 1990's he was the only Canadian artist truly known in Paris France art circles.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Public domain.

No, theirs to do with as they wish...

Dead men own no art. Outlawing or forbidding 'cultural appropriation' is a tool of control. It limits progress, and stifles innovation.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

No, it protects people's religious beliefs. Woodland Art is not dead as well as their culture does not belong to Public Domain and is not dead, it is very much alive pursued by indigenous artists of that school and belongs to them...just like the Nazis who stole art from the Jews during WWII did not have a right to it, especially when there was a depiction of family members in the images..."Woman in Gold"...

Making a painting, with your own paint and your own labor, is exactly like NAZIism, that's rich, and funny, but in no way demonstrably true.

One is ignorant of Canada but in the United States, copyright and royalties go to the heirs of the author or beneficiaries until 70 years after death

Thanks to regulatory manipulation by Disney and the like.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

The indigenous people are geniuses and have always been exploited and manipulated i love the art

You may want to consider the actual definition of 'genius'.

Love it too...

If i want to paint like that I won't ask the central committee of the communist party if i have permission.