What seems questionable? It seems like the wording is pretty solid to me. The obligations of everyone is well-defined. I can't think of a way that either could get out of their obligations while fufilling the contract. That is, except for the
or its equivalent in another crypto
line. IMO that could be a little problematic for @neoxian if @mango-juice tries:
- Create a Steem Engine token, call it
SCAMNEOXIAN - Issue themselves 1000
SCAMNEOXIAN - Place a buy order for 1
SCAMNEOXIANat 1 STEEM, makingSCAMNEOXIAN"worth" 1 STEEM - Issuing 1000
SCAMNEOXIANto @neoxian and saying that it's "worth" 1000 STEEM
(of course I don't think @mango-juice will do that)
So while there is some wording that can be used to scam @neoxian, this is only a problem for @neoxian, and I can't see anything questionable that could be used against the loaner by @neoxian.
What is not written in that post is Trust. Yes you are quite right there, it's not so hard to create a SCAM token, but no nobody thinks about the after story.
Whatever I am in here, all credit goes to @neoxian and the city. I grew up in the city from a red fish.
Last but not least, there are more agreement conversion in discord which includes that only reputated tokens are allowed for exchange.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yea, that part could probably use more clarity. It's probably not a big deal. I don't automatically accept any crypto or token in existence. There are certain ones that I accept and I wouldn't take some strange token as payment.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I meant no insult. My comment was mainly about the necessity to acquire the private key. From everything I have read it is not safe to give the private key. Unless I misread the article and it was not the private key. If that is the case I do apologise.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit