Well. You lose when you send a lot. But it can work out when you send a little. I'm only testing them right now, I'm not sure. I think I'm even.
I suggest you carefully tally up your losses and wins. It would be a fool's errand to continue doing that if it's profitable. This is a social media based on relationship building where manual curation allows the cream to rise to the top. Vote selling sidesteps all that, the social part of social media and quality control.
But I can say for sure that people who pay to get to trending - lose shit load of money.
I've seen people make the opposite claim.
if it's not profitable* XD
Yeah, I think it would be much better without vote bots. But it is what it is. Have to adapt.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Are you saying that you are making profit?
At a minimum, it should be profitable for you, not the whales who sell their big votes.
It's up to the witnesses to decide what to do with bid bots. And it's up to us to vote for the right witnesses. Maybe it's time to start voting.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, I'm saying that there should be "Not profitable" instead "profitable"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit