RE: Should we welcome the fork of Bitshares---Cybex?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Should we welcome the fork of Bitshares---Cybex?

in beyondbitcoin •  8 years ago  (edited)

what are we racing to? bts dex been over 4000 btc daily volume and only one with margin still. why even bother calling it a dex if it's not decentralized. decentralization isn't some gimmick, it's solution for security that prevents minority being able to censor/edit/manipulate blockchain. if it's not decentralized for security sake to make it easier for minority to update it however they like, might as well use a centralized exchange. centralized solutions posing as decentralized put people at risk, like when ethereum developers forked the chain with only 4% support literally to just give themselves money.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Maybe Bitshares is not perfect nor as efficient as centralized application , but is a real decentralized application, and it is the paradise of anarchists. So the fans of Bitshares and the fans of cybex don't overlap.