Free Speech Go Home!: The Push To Label Anti-Vaxxers A Hate Group

in bigpharma •  6 years ago  (edited)

05905B60-FB64-4673-9635-146A5F73A8CD.png

source



Really? I guess because you say so. Unlike how this article paints anti-vaxxers. I don’t blame the mom. I’m skeptic whether the child actually had influenza. Influenza can only be confirmed through blood test.

“Only about 15-20 per cent of people who come down with flu-like symptoms have the influenza virus -- the other 80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests, which are rarely done. In 2001, a year in which death certificates listed 257 Americans as having died of flu, only 18 were positively identified as true flus. The other 239 were simply assumed to be flus and most likely had few true flus among them." - source

Also death from influenza...really? Are you sure?

"The fact is, no one knows how many people die after being infected with the flu virus. The death estimates are not based on body counts, lab tests or autopsies."

"I think people may have the misconception that every person who dies from the flu is somehow counted somewhere, and they're not," Gardam said."

"The "2,000 to 8,000" numbers are based on computer models — a statistical guess that comes out of the end of a mathematical formula that makes a range of assumptions about death and flu."

"They're tossing it into a big computer and they're churning out estimates," Gardam said as he scribbled numbers on a white board to show me how the models work."

"One model counts all respiratory and circulatory deaths — that's death from heart and lung failure — as flu deaths."

Also!

"Another model assumes that every extra death that happens in the winter is a flu death. At the risk of oversimplifying, this is the basic formula of that model: winter deaths (minus) summer deaths = death by flu virus."

"That includes winter deaths from slippery sidewalks, snowy roads, freezing temperatures, plus all the winter heart failure, lung failure and deaths from cancer. In the language of the computer model, all excess mortality in winter is considered "death by flu" - source

"The model extrapolates that the flu virus will cause more deaths across all causes, including "disorders of the nervous system," stroke and "disorders of the digestive system." Which means that according to the model, flu causes 33 more "accidental falls" every year, 18 more "accidental poisonings," and 68 more deaths from "psychotic conditions." But what does flu have to do with deaths from accidental poisonings or accidental falls?" - source

"We see lots of people coming in with upper respiratory infections and we don't know what causes it. Sometimes if they are really sick, we'll test for influenza. We rarely test for anything else." - source

"There's another point to consider here. Using death estimates is the scariest way to talk about the risk from flu, because 8,000 thousand sounds like a lot of deaths. But if you ask, "8,000 deaths out of how many people?" suddenly the risk seems much smaller. In fact, it would be 8,000 deaths among 35 million Canadians. In other words, in a normal flu season, about 0.02 per cent of Canadians are in danger of dying from the flu, using the highest estimate. Another way to look at it is this: 99.98 per cent of Canadians will not die of flu this year."

"For proof of how models keep changing their estimates, look back at Canada's flu files. More than a decade ago, flu was estimated to kill about 500 to 1,500 Canadians every year. But in 2003 Health Canada changed models, and the estimates jumped to "700 to 2,500 per annum." The 2,500 deaths at the upper end of that range quickly became the lower end, when an even newer model was tried in 2007, pushing the upper limit to 8,000 based on the severe flu seasons of 1997 to 1999." - source

"Cause-of-death statistics are based solely on the underlying cause of death [internationally defined] as 'the disease or injury which initiated the train of events leading directly to death,'" explains the National Center for Health Statistics. Because the flu was rarely an "underlying cause of death," the CDC created the sound-alike term, "influenza-associated death."

"Using this new, loose definition, CDC's computer models could tally people who died of a heart ailment or other causes after having the flu. As William Thompson of the CDC's National Immunization Program admitted, influenza-associated mortality is "a statistical association ... I don't know that we would say that it's the underlying cause of death."

"The CDC's decision to play up flu deaths dates back a decade, when it realized the public wasn't following its advice on the flu vaccine. During the 2003 flu season "the manufacturers were telling us that they weren't receiving a lot of orders for vaccine,"Dr. Glen Nowak, associate director for communications at CDC's National Immunization Program, told National Public Radio. "It really did look like we needed to do something to encourage people to get a flu shot."

"The CDC unabashedly decided to create a mass market for the flu vaccine by enlisting the media into panicking the public. An obedient and unquestioning media obliged by hyping the numbers, and 10 years later it is obliging still." - source

That was all from my post ⬇️⬇️⬇️

Don't Drink the Fear Porn Tea: Facts about Influenza


I can’t imagine for the life of me why would you post on Facebook, let alone publicly post on Facebook that your infant died. I mean a death in the family is a private affair. It doesn’t fit along side statues of what you had for breakfast. So this is really indicative of where we are at in society when people are seeking condolences on a toxic social media platform, but I digress.

Ron Says to “expect more”. Oooo those evil anti-Vaxxers are out for blood. NOTE: interesting plot twist with this Ron character near the end of this post.

This doesn’t make a whole lot of sense of course. I mean the whole point of an anti-vaxxer is question the big pharma science behind these vaccines and the dangers of a 72 vaccine schedule imposed on children today. They come from a place of concerned parents, who care about the lives of children. Who care about mothers and fathers of children who have already been injured by vaccines. There’s real evidence out there that shows it’s causing harm there’s no denying that.

It comes down to the fact that the pro vaccine lobby can’t debate. Their arguments are weak and full of the same rhetoric over and over. “Vaccines safe and effective”, “anti-vaccine parents are endangering their children.”

Talk about your bullying! Have you ever heard the things pro-vaxxers say to the anti-vaccine/vaccine hesitant parents.

source


source


Which brings us back to this story. It’s like they’re flipping the narrative. We have anti-vaxxers attacking parents of dead children because they spread pro-vaccine rhetoric. Really uneducated, unhelpful and mean spirited comments (as you will see as we progress through this article).

No real anti-vaxxer would deny the fact diseases can cause death. It’s whether or not those deaths (in terms of numbers) are worse than the death or injuries caused from the vaccine for that very disease.


When a child dies? Do you mean when they use a child’s death as propaganda for the vaccine industry? It’s either that or mother’s post about their baby’s death not unlike how they post what they had for breakfast.

Seriously! It’s either an cry for attention or for the vaccine industry. I don’t like it either way. It’s seriously messed up!


“Vaccine preventable death”. Okay, but even the mainstream media admits that the flu vaccine is ineffective. They can’t prevent influenza, because they can’t predict which flu virus strains are making the rounds. Although, I’m doubtful that is even the issue. I think that it’s because as I mentioned earlier that “80-85 per cent actually caught rhinovirus or other germs that are indistinguishable from the true flu without laboratory tests“.

There’s no preventing a cold, other than common sense practices of staying clean and healthy. Matter of fact, getting a flu vaccine shot will only make your chances of falling ill greater. It may even be what’s spreads the flu. Consider for a moment, flu outbreaks take place at the same time they start to administer flu shots for “flu season”.


Okay, I get that because your kid died (supposedly from the flu) you think now that it can be prevented via a flu shot. Regardless of what you think, the flu shot is highly ineffective. Even the msm admits to this fact.

Okay, so because it happened to you. Regardless of reasons, whether it was because of a weak immunity, poor nutrition, etc. Regardless of the reasons why your child died ‘from the flu’. Does that mean that a vaccine is the right choice for every parent? No!


He doesn’t deny it. So? He doesn’t deny it because some people do say dumb shit sometimes. Without a doubt a very small portion of those people are just dumbasses. Anything larger is part of an operation.






See that guy gets it, “Infiltrators”. That’s what I thought as soon as I saw this story. Just think about it, why now? Why a story like this now and not years ago? It’s because the industry is losing the argument on vaccines. In order to silence the opposition you have to lump them in with hate groups. The best way to do this is to hire online trolls to go and attack pro-vaxxer.

I caught a recent video by truth stream media that’s pretty much shows the narrative I am pointing out now. That’s blantaly obviously in this wretched article.

“Free Speech and Shutting Down The Vaccine Debate.”



To quote again “the flu was rarely an "underlying cause of death," the CDC created the sound-alike term, "influenza-associated death." and again ”As William Thompson of the CDC's National Immunization Program admitted, influenza-associated mortality is "a statistical association ... I don't know that we would say that it's the underlying cause of death."

Done, moving on.


Look what that friggin actor said in the video. I’m sorry, but wtf is normal about injecting chemical cocktails along with a ‘dead’ virus for the purpose of triggering a immunological response. No, what’s normal, what our bodies have been doing for centuries is building up our own natural immunological defenses. Along with the advances of hygiene and medical care (should it be necessary) the death rate from theses diseases have dropped dramatically.

Another video I watched the other day and I think is quite relevant here as well.

“The Loss of Freedom of Speech”



Oh yeah? You got Mr.Trudeau to get the ‘flu shot’? BIG DEAL! Why don’t you get Trudeau to give his three kids a flu shot? I mean like really! Wtf does getting the Prime Minister of Canada go do PR flu shot prove? He’s an adult. Isn’t your campaign about kids?

It’s because there’s no F-ing way he would do it. Guaranteed! You ask that clown to give his three kids the flu shot. He’ll say “F**k you! You’re not injecting my kids with that stuff.” All these world leaders, tv personalities are the same. Bunch of hypocrites!

Dr.Oz remember that guy? He pushes vaccines pretty hard...except for his own kids.

“Dr. Oz Admits HE WILL NEVER VACCINATE HIS OWN KIDS”



Again, we have the “well my kid died so that means vaccines work” logic. How about your kid was one of those unfortunate to die young. Whether it was really because of the flu or whatever the REAL underlying cause was. It’s a terrible loss regardless. I couldn’t even imagine what I’d do with my life, if one of my children were to pass away. Campaigning for the vaccine industry would not be it.

You can call it a “go to conspiracy”. I call it a business relationship between government and vaccine industry.

*"Vaccines have always been a business. They've just never been a very good business."

"We were losing money," said Claude Vezeau, former chief executive officer at Montreal-based IAF BioChem International, Canada's largest maker of vaccines in the 1990s. "All vaccines were losing money." - source

"H5N1 would alter government approaches to pandemic planning. But it would also create a new and unprecedented opportunity for the global pharmaceutical industry. It was, as Dr. Ossi recalls, "an obvious commercial opportunity" for the drug companies - one that is reshaping their businesses."

"In a matter of a few years, flu shots have gone from being a marginal, money-losing business to a massive profit generator for a small number of global companies, as governments and the public hasten to protect themselves from getting sick." - source

"The real business is a business of stockpiling. It is not a reactive market. It is something that is proactively being built with governments," Mr. Monteyne said."

"Between 2004 and 2007, vaccine sales across the industry soared an average of 32 per cent each year, with flu vaccine leading the way. That is roughly four times faster than any other pharmaceutical product."

"In a year that will be remembered for widespread public worry about the H1N1 virus, or swine flu, vaccines have become a $24-billion business. Analysts predict the global vaccine industry will top $40-billion by 2012. For companies like Glaxo, Sanofi-Aventis, Merck & Co., Novartis AG and Pfizer Inc., the fear of a pandemic has translated into a financial windfall that has been years in the making. Worldwide, nearly 1 billion doses of H1N1 vaccine have been ordered in 2009." - source

So there you have it. They’re a friggin business! It’s not about saving lives, it’s about scaring lives. It’s their bottom line.


Herd immunity is a hijacked term, if anything vaccines prevent herd immunity from ever occurring. If it weren’t for vaccines many of these diseases would have burned themselves out over the years. Instead they are allowed to mutate and the natural immunity that’s pass along from mother to child is absent. Increasing that vulnerability to these viruses.


source

Also, check my post on whooping cough here

WHOOP VAERS IT IS!: CBC (Canadian Brainwashing Corporation) Guilts Anti-Vaxxer Parents Over Mom's Sick Child.


I’d I like to point out that she says she got nasty comments just 24hrs after her baby died. Meaning that in less 24hrs after her kid died, she was already on social media posting about it! Like wtf!? Sorry, but are you human? Aren’t you supposed be grieving? Not making f**king Facebook statuses! This whole article has to fake. I’m not saying that their kids didn’t die. Just that there’s a lot of dishonesty in what they are saying. It’s either that or they are just complete vapid human beings that turn to social media for any kind of validation. Mental illness really.


“A lot of them come from the position that they have children that were vaccine-injured," Catherine said. "But a fair chunk of them are just haters."


Well ya know what our little friend Says about haters


See just more uneducated, non-intellectual hateful comments. Just like a paid troll would say. Why wouldn’t they use paid trolls? Monsanto did it (still does) to promote gmos.

With the purchase of Monsanto by Bayer recently finalized, Bayer has decided to offer a never before seen look at the secret departments behind the infamous “Let Nothing Go” GMO propaganda campaign.

“We wanted to show the world that a new form of transparency would be taking place,” explained Bayer CEO Werner Baymann. “Monsanto has long been accused of nefarious behind the scenes actions, and it is my responsibility to move us all in a new direction.”

On my first stop of this tour of the St. Louis campus’ basement I was first showed Monsanto’s pride and joy, the troll room.

*“Troll room” is really just a nickname given to the thousands of now emptied cubicles with aging computers.

Baymann said that he felt bad about being forced to let go the 8,493 employees.*

“Monsanto had a good thing going. A contracted labor force getting paid 60 cents per post to harass and intimidate anyone online speaking bad about GMOs or Roundup.” - source


source

Israel has been doing the same forever. Many countries, including Canada and the US most definitely delve in this same form of social media manipulation.


This story runs like a ‘how to silence your opposition’ guide. Paint them as ignorant and hateful, find a way to connect them with antisemitism and so on.


Oh, they threw in a little true. They have to do that in order to muddy it with their propaganda so that people will dismiss valid arguments along with garbage comments. All assumed as hate speech from a hate group.

“Nazi go home”





Just more of the same crap and there’s your Nazi reference.

⬅️
⬅️
⬅️

Just watch!, they will come out with a statistic, that shows that majority of anti-vaxxers are white Christians. Some with ties to white supremacist groups. It’s coming, I’m telling you!



There’s the Hegelian dialectic. Problem, Reaction, Solution. Create a problem with anti-vaxxer hate speech, get a reaction and offer the solution. Which is to label anti-vaxxer (which mostly consist of parents of vaccine injured children) as a hate group. Then bring in the censorship. We’ve already seen Facebook and YouTube censoring the dissemination of anti-vaccine information. The user is next to go.


Plot Twist

They even admit to the sock puppet accounts! Oh, but no. It’s in order to spy on the anti-vaxxers and report all their hate speech. GIMME A BREAK ! Lmao this is just so ridiculous! What can I even say anymore? It’s all right there, they admit it!


Why if thy wanted to win mom over would they propose such a useless comment like “to read!”. That doesn’t make sense, it’s friggin stupid!

Alright, I’m done with this garbage. The article wraps up in three more screen captures. I’ll wrap things up at the bottom.





Thanks for reading this massive post. There was just too much in this article to not go through it all. I hope you can see what I’m seeing here. They are most definitely (imo) looking to label the opposition as a hate group. They can’t win the argument, there’s just too much evidence on our side. Their only option at this point, is to destroy our credibility and our ability present said evidence.


⬇️ Other Good Reads ⬇️

Mexican Scientists Find a CURE for HPV (But It Wouldn’t Be PROFITABLE to Approve It in the US)

50 something vaccine patents held by the cdc

HOW PLUMBING (NOT VACCINES) ERADICATED DISEASE

Herd Immunity: Junk Science at its Finest

Vaccines Did Not Save Us – 2 Centuries Of Official Statistics


IMG_1295.PNG



Other ways you can interact with me.

Whaleshares: Venomnymous

Weku: VenomnymouS

Twitter: VenomnymouS

Vero username: Venomnymous

Youtube: I Am AwareWolf

Minds @venomnymous

Somee.social: VenomnymouS

Notice a pattern yet?

Discord @venonymous#7826

Trybe.one: venomnymous

Bitchute : venomnymous

Referral links

ABRACheck out ABRA and easily invest in 28 cryptocurrencies or BIT10, an index of the top cryptos. Use my link to sign up and get $25 in free bitcoin after your first Bank/Amex deposit, or 1.5% cash back when you exchange cryptos (T&C apply):

Presearch signup
https://presearch.org/signup?rid=101528

BUNZ: Upcycle your old stuff and earn Crypto posting ads for your old stuff.

Have you tried Bunz? Sign up using my link and get an extra 500 BTZ.
https://epap9.app.goo.gl/7twSxDsAuUcs3BsG8

Airdrips

Cointiply

Bitmines

Bittube

E-Begs

My byte(my)balls wallet: MLPSLXTLPUZS25DIGWZYPKSOKMZF7IB2

Coinpot: wallets

Bitcoin 3FQvHVaw4BgtBMjan14WyoF3vPDTLCQrcm

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Great work.

Those are some mighty fine "hate-facts" you got there, upvoted!

“Hate-Facts”! I’m stealing that term lol

UpvoteBank
Your upvote bank
__2.jpgThis post have been upvoted by the @UpvoteBank service. Want to know more and receive "free" upvotes click here

Curated for #informationwar (by @truthforce)

Latest Drive For Delegation/Fundraising Click Here!!!

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

  • Upvote this comment or Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP or Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here