SEC Commissioner, Hester M. Peirce, made a crypto-friendly speech at the Medici Conference, on 2nd May, in which she set-out her vision of the SEC's regulatory role, likening it to a lifeguard on a beach;
watching "over what is happening, but she is not sitting with sandcastle builders monitoring their every design decision. From her perch on the lifeguard stand, she can spot dangerous activity and intervene with a blow of the whistle or, if necessary, a direct intervention. She always stands ready to answer questions about the rules of the beach. She puts up the red flag to warn of dangerous riptides or sharks."
This regulatory framework would be in contrast to the 'regulatory sandboxes' of the UK, U.A.E and Singapore, an approach also being considered by Malta, Lithuania, and Bermuda, amongst others and one that Hester M. Pierce appears to dislike;
Indeed, she asked the listening audience to;
"help us learn more about the technology so that we are able to think about the regulatory obstacles that may stand in the way of crypto-technology’s ability to improve our lives. How can I, in a sense, be a better lifeguard?"
I think that is a wise approach in terms of regulation in regards to the lifeguard analogy. Makes the regulators lives easier too.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit