Advance look - Exploring the Steem blockchain: Who are the best curators?

in blockchain-metrics •  2 years ago  (edited)

According to a scoring method that I'm toying with (and assuming no errors in my code), here are yesterday's top-50 curators with more than 10 curation rewards. If I'm thinking about this right, the scoring should be independent of wallet size.

image.png

Pixabay License

Since this is a first draft of code, please take it with a (very large) grain of salt. ;-)

RankAccountScore# curation rewards
1.curx3.44810085199002789
2.kevinwong3.352749160627574689
3.thranax3.262787407715968413
4.rosselena3.155219165467093615
5.hive-1761473.11595702849453322
6.misterajay3.11315853892144189
7.suntr3.07808260587470371
8.remade3.0705505774239734119
9.kingporos3.02175433375708361
10.hive-1808213.020474542789256361
11.veryhappyday3.0110350496954337107
12.harkar2.970134240473849126
13.steem-d-anlovnit2.951402962807753416
14.ducato2.922009877086004340
15.karja2.8868016330771606168
16.moh.arif2.828814356821586430
17.alexmove.witness2.787367521638777717
18.hafizullah2.736965274131903513
19.happy.free2.733555943896485411
20.yonaikerurso2.72274976050473623
21.ydavgonzalez2.710301703072188315
22.tingtong122.701470209252583736
23.alexmove2.68993398641756117
24.turkcayi2.67752253684754637
25.steemit-market2.676975489823852333
26.apoloo12.662733391448505444
27.yakspeace2.653434336622646512
28.mayepariata2.6527666337187620
29.enamul172.647835480052542312
30.gabrielagg2.623131275764772714
31.sct.curator2.59870002260323811
32.bangla.witness2.570694726524845717
33.mcgome2.538612879609452511
34.uco.bnb-l2.530733342430858511
35.nevlu1232.50694600720196517
36.realmankwon.scot2.501160304955035511
37.crisvera2.49743916255539416
38.maytte2.49683490394372321
39.uco.research2.491804790199063611
40.oppps2.4709790677807217130
41.realman07112.454958309328222611
42.steem-venera2.453124163370895313
43.ezzy2.437971758459919211
44.radard2.4368704821172911
45.ripon06302.427156841157859536
46.cub12.421765093950962754
47.steemit-pak2.3991109701091513
48.mdkamran992.39563738347935211
49.sct2.37635236717678211
50.ctime2.364418940709981422

Eventually, I hope to start publishing regular updates as well as the code I'm using, but it might be a while... Finding time to work on this has been a challenge.

Looking at the SteemDB curation history from a handful of accounts in the list, these accounts seem to be collecting curation rewards at a rate in the neighborhood of 20-26% of their staked SP.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

@remlaps-lite,Thank you very much for your interesting research.
I would like to know what indicators did you use to study the effectiveness of curation?
And what do you think is more important: Avg. Efficiency or Weighted Avg.?

It's actually fairly simple. The curation score that I'm assigning on any post is a multiple of the ratio - [VESTS received] divided by [rshares voted]. Then, that number is averaged over the entire day for each voter. (I multiply VESTS times 1 billion, to get "nanovests" just to reduce the decimal places in the final fraction).

This is a simple average, since it's not weighted by rshares voted. That's on the "to-do list".

Excellent work