The Three Challenges That Every Music Blockchain Startup Faces

in blockchain •  7 years ago 

In my view, there are three main challenges that have to be overcome for a music startup to make an impact using blockchain technology.

So far there have been a lot of people talking like they are going to change how music gets monetized. But outside of steem, there hasn’t been much progress. Here’s what I think is holding us back:

(1) Convenience


source: pixabay.com

The kind of work that needs to happen on a hardware level for a music streaming service (reliable search, fast load times) is hard to accomplish on a blockchain system. So far nobody seems to have found the way to load large files quickly without a central server.

Projects like IPFS are trying to make it possible to host songs on the blockchain - but so far results have been slow and unreliable.

YouTube and Spotify are two examples of companies that can load up music on demand with no lag. Blockchain services will need to perform at that level in other to succeed. Most likely some kind of hybrid centralized/tokenized system will arrive first, where hosting is solved by a central server.

(2) Collectability

It doesn’t feel good to have an endless abyss of music to choose from. People like structure and they like limitations. That’s way Spotify offers so many playlists. You can find your playlist and listen to whatever comes out of it.


source: pixabay.com

Vinyl collectors enjoy building up their personal collection. You can’t hear the latest hits, but you have a cultivated batch of records that reflects your musical taste.

Bandcamp is a service that did a great job of building the collectible aspect of music. Every user has a profile where they can live stream any of the music they’ve ever bought on bandcamp. This is the closest thing to “digital vinyl” that I’ve seen.

With blockchain projects, you are up against all of that collectability. There is so much focus on cheap and easy access to anything in the world, but not enough focus on the real user experience. How can people be convinced to switch away from their current collections?

(3) Authority

The hard part with building a new form of music distribution is getting the big artists. Spotify struggled with this problem early on too. When you can’t hear all of your favorite artists on the blockchain, you are unlikely to switch over.

So far there haven’t been many stories about famous musicians using blockchain in a serious way. Apparently Bjork is giving away cryptocurrency with her new album, but it’s some super random token.


bjork. source: wikipedia

When I see Justin Bieber or Kayne West getting involved in a blockchain music startup, I’ll pay attention. Right now there are a lot of unestablished startups all vying to change the music industry. The end result is a lot of noise without too much action to back it up.

When Will We See Blockchain Music Apps Gain Traction?

To be honest, I think we are still a little early to be expecting good blockchain music apps. I think that the steem ecosystem is as close as we can get for now, where we monetize the act of blogging about our process.

The actual action of selling a song is still best done through Spotify, Bandcamp, Soundcloud, and other centralized services. They are just better at that right now.

I have no doubt that in 5 years, everything could be different. I’m just looking at the next year and not seeing 2018 as a big break for music in the blockchain world. I honestly feel like we are going to be early adapters for a while longer.

It’s weird because with the internet, music got hit really hard really quickly. But I think the opposite may be the case with blockchain.

What do you think? Is there a big future for blockchain-related music services?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Couldn't a company make a site using the steem blockchain to buy music and then have multiple posts everyday sharing their music? Or would that be considered spammy? Haven't any problems with Dsound yet. You can put a buy link into your post. But it would be cool if I could use steem to buy music and download. I don't know... does any of what I am saying make sense lol?

You could do that but you probably would not get many upvotes. Most people who just post songs get not much attention.

What we really need is a webstore that offers discounts for upvotes. So if the album costs $8, and your upvote is worth $1, you could upvote and get the $1 discount

DSound is cool I've just had a lot of problems with loading songs on it :-/

yo, this one seemed pretty dope. Vezt.io
I watched their AMA on youtube the other day.
Seem like a decent team with a pretty radical concept.
There is hope.

here's the important part of the link
youtube.com/watch?v=LMtABebd3pE

Hm.... one hour long, will have to look at that later. Thank you for the recommendation, haven't heard too much about Vezt yet.

What projects is the more advanced for you so far?
I invested in Musicoin. They have already a platform running
But not aware of any other competitor

I've heard of some people using Musicoin, but honestly have not looked too closely at it myself. Another one that I think does something similar is Ujo Music, I look forward to their alpha launch.

I dunno if you can call some of the other ones "competitors," they probably do different things. DotBC is one that wants to introduce a new blockchain codec (.bc files), while LBRY is building a sort of open source YouTube, while BitTunes has an iTunes-esque app built on bitcoin...

There are so many! Out of all of them, I think that LBRY and Steem have the best long-term potential right now to create new monetization opportunities in the music industry.

I will have a look into LBRY thank you for the advice =)

If they are using the block-chain for decentralization for music then yes their is a huge benefits and room for it, you have artists like NF that let his record deal go and started his own record label to produce his music, his own way, he isn't main stream yet but he did just release a song with Eminem.
For Decentralization Records like ADSactly Records it will be easier for those starting out that want to make their way without compromising their believes and values just to achieve a dream , not many can or would do what NF did.

I hope that ADSactly Records can reach a ton of people and prove the power of the blockchain. I do have to be honest that I am not familiar with NF right now.

Havana, ooh na-na (ay)
Half of my heart is in Havana, ooh-na-na (ay, ay)
He took me back to East Atlanta, na-na-na
All of my heart is in Havana (ay)
There's somethin' 'bout his manners (uh huh)
Havana, ooh na-na (uh)

Keep grinding, God always provides. See his blessings in everything you do !

Agreed, especially re: organization and curating of playlists and related songs and all that, people have a hard time coming to a platform like Steemit and having to just endlessly search through lists to find stuff, and then have to click the blog link, and then have to stream it through an embed. It needs to be way more streamlined and specific to music to really be successful.

Ya! Steemit is really disorganized haha. I can't even save a song into a "playlist" or anything. We will really need a new interface altogether for it to work... and I think that will maybe not happen until closer to 2019 when there is more traffic.

Fingers crossed

I think you hit the nail with your arguments. I must say, in the entire Crypto world, user experience is forgotten, as if it doesn't matter. Well it does! Also in blockchain w saw some pay-per-track-listen offerings (musicoin) which failed because that is a couple of steps back for the listener compared to Spotify, TIDAL and others. Than I think what most services lack are the service an artists uses to sell their work, like labels, publishers etc... This AudioCoin that will be given away with the purchase of the upcoming Bjork album has a label section in their service "Aurovine" , I didn't see that with Musicoin and others. I think for the big(ger) artists platforms like iTunes, Google Music, Beatport will be used for a considerable time still. These platforms already give more to the artist, and that is one of the claims made by all new music platforms, the artists shall earn a larger cut from their work. Reality is that those who can spend most money to promote their work, earn by far the most, which is in the end just the top of a enormous pyramid. I think artists will have to earn their living with performing, rather than selling the music on top of a medium. I see this with my friends in the electronic music scene. 10/15 years ago they made some decent money with an EP/LP, nowadays not anymore. But, they HAVE to produce otherwise promoters will not want to book the DJ/performer anymore, so releasing becomes more like marketing rather than a direct revenue generator. Maybe it should be like that in the end.