Genderless clothing is an inevitability of Western culture's de-Christianization.
That being said, there are a few items that a man can wear from the women's section and still look masculine, and vice versa - socks, for one. For another, it's not unheard of for a woman to look for not-so-short shorts in the men's section. A lot of store space is probably spent putting similar items in 2 different places.
Hmm. We're pretty sure that's a stretch to say the least, @sidekickguy. Suggesting that the distinction between men and women's clothing has religious undertones? Even typing it out we can already see the absurdity in it. Are you really trying to propose that mankind can thank "God" for the distinction between a man's boxer and a woman's panty?
Really?
You present an interesting take on it, but do you care to elaborate any further how "God" made separate clothing lines possible? And how breaking down those non existent barriers would undermine "God" in the process?
Simply put - we are talking about clothing here, and you took it to the church.
Why?
~ SC
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit