Help Me Name My Company

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

As a cynic, I would name my corporation Morningstar, but -- so it goes.

Morgenfjell (morning mountain) if you're feeling very northern European.

Sjajnastaza (shining path) if you're feeling more eastern European (and in tribute to some of my favourite local restaurants; it's a long story).

Garmee (summer) if we want to get oddly metaphysical (and because it looks bloody awesome in Hindi: गर्मी)

Edrych (look) if you never quite got over your love of the flag of Wales.

I've never really become tired of borrowing heavily from other languages than English. You're lucky we haven't indulged Klingon or Tsolyani.

$0.54

lorilikes (53) · 7 years ago

I appreciate all of those awesome ideas actually. :) Thanks for being sound of mind and continuously reasonable. 🤓

$0.66

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

It's a terrible burden and I don't suggest that anyone take it up as a hobby. All of this sanity and reasonability are entirely too much for anyone to have to tolerate.

$0.55

2 votes

praise-eu (67) · 7 years ago

Agility mediaspot

$0.52

2 votes

rikaz87 (63) · 7 years ago

Helo @lorilikes, I propose this" Oriental Star".
The oriental star comes out early and goes late.

Wish you always cheerful. Thanks

$0.47

rizky05 (48) · 7 years ago

I think ⭐️RESILIENCE is a perfect name, I like that name.
hope you like it too.
Good luck

$0.45

nasrol (59) · 7 years ago (edited)

Good afternoon Lori ...
First I am very happy even mengapresiasikan You for the effort you are going to build. Certainly very happy if one day I could contribute towards your company. Sure, a good name will influence on a company but I do not know so much of the language of the United Kingdom for a company.
What if I take from my native language (Aceh) n " GASEHPOMA" which means mother's affectionp.
Good luck.

$0.44

molokwu (51) · 7 years ago

How about phoenix capital

$0.43

2 votes

adnan-mp (48) · 7 years ago

wow @lorilikes, a suitable title "belief in khiyanati"
greatly in pity you have to stop your work trust you give to someone you have to pull it back, because secretly he deceive you. because the act that he did you get big losses can not complete your pogram, and the third party has begun to hesitate to you. and you must be sure the task will be completed until it becomes a motive to rise.

$0.43

4 votes

xabi (71) · 7 years ago

My suggestion is
"VINCIT" for truth in latin...hope you like it!!!

$0.43

wiralhokseumawe (60) · 7 years ago

A name is a name or label given to objects, people, places, products (eg product brands) and even ideas or concepts, which are usually used to distinguish one another. my suggestion, according to Theme ** RISING FROM THE RUBLE And WRECKAGE OF AN UNFAIR BATTLE (FULL OF HONESTY)** The suitable name is TRUEET (another form of TRUITT) small but honest
Babies are regarded as sincere and honest angels, positive and virtuous attributes such as integrity, honesty, and candor, including bluntness in behavior, and in tandem with no lies, to achieve success. maybe it's just a suggestion, my prayers accompany good luck @lorilikes

$0.33

praise-eu (67) · 7 years ago

Agility mediaspot

$0.03

eldahcee (54) · 7 years ago

How about Eclat?

I understand how you feel. Sometimes naming a brand could be very difficult.

Just try this one tho, and if you want, i have a friend that can help with the logo design

download (19).jpg

Eclat could mean brilliance and strength and i guess the logo design too can cover other interpretations

$0.00

couragekebs001 (46) · 7 years ago

this to me is a great suggestion.

download (10).jpg

$0.00

lorilikes (53) · 7 years ago

Did you create this?
How do you pronounce this word?

$0.00

boile (42) · 7 years ago

hello @lorikikes is amazing,
and # Steadfastly In the face of trials.
even if you get obstacles and ringtanhan in making decisions, but I am sure you can decide fairly justly, because heavy people who have given us makn, we are thieves fonis and but we have to decide.
and your heart's content will not lie wrong or not him.
and this you must decide because of self-esteem and so that the trust of others do not fade to you. thank you from @boile

$0.00

sanach (70) · 7 years ago

I think ⭐️Brilliance its perfect name, what you think Mam ?

$0.00

sheble (35) · 7 years ago

Comment on who wants to name your next access 💡
Thank you......

$0.00

marihuya (43) · 7 years ago (edited)

Not so good at naming but I will just throw in ''Mettle Fort''.

$0.00

lynxki (38) · 7 years ago

I would suggest Exceed as the name for your company. Good luck whatever name you choose!

$0.00

semy (40) · 7 years ago

hercules is suitable if we give the company name.

$0.00

munawire (56) · 7 years ago (edited)

$0.00

michaeljerry0 (54) · 7 years ago

I am not good at nAming things ,but i will offer you free graphics design when you get your desired name

$0.00

purepinag (53) · 7 years ago

'Hercules'😸
I think you will try this name use in your company.

$0.00

coreradio (56) · 7 years ago (edited)

$0.00

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

You guys had 30,000 in funds from clients? 30,000 what?

I'm not even starting by questioning whether someone could embezzle 30,000 something from you, but I have to start by wondering what it is that you're supposed to have's 30,000 of.

After all, your website looks like something out of the late 90s. It has a media player which is strictly right out of the book basic JavaScript embed and reminds me of those heady days of yesteryear when people thought that streaming their own radio station was going to end up with big bucks. (I remember those days. I was part of those days.)

Even by Internet radio standards, this is pretty weak sauce. No playlist of recently played tracks, no ability to request things from your archives when there's no live show planned – all pretty basic stuff for Internet radio as of 10 years ago.

Not to mention the header image which has a broken bottom shading underneath the embedded player if your browser is running 1920 x 1080.

These are bush league design errors that I've talked first year design students around.

So I'll reiterate – what could an employee of your site take 30,000 of from "clients?" It certainly can't be USD, or I'll have to ask why it wasn't invested into a solid web design company instead of whoever did this mess.

And if you're going to link to an article which supposedly describes what's going on, you probably ought to at least make sure that it resolves to an actual post and/or article on your site instead of giving:

ParseError thrown

syntax error, unexpected '<', expecting end of file

I don't want to suggest that you have a credibility gap here, because that would be to imply that you have any credibility at all.

Like I said, minor-league web design stuff. If you want me to believe that Lori walked away with 30,000 of anything that you owned, first you have to convince me that anyone would trust you with 30,000 something. Maybe 30,000 US pennies (which for those reading this outside of the US would come out to be $300 USD). Still, I subscribe to the belief that an significant claim requires significant evidence, not just naked assertion.

You know, if we cared about truth. We may not.

$0.49

thirdstryker1 (57) · 7 years ago

$0.00

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

That would, even more so, put Core Media on the spot in making an extraordinary claim. Which this is.

Extraordinary proof is required, and not something that looks like a knocked together late 90s website. Especially if "media services" is supposed to be your go to business. If you drop a link which is supposed to be that extraordinary proof, everything about that proof has to be credible.

You get hit twice on this. Firstly, you make an unsupported claim which looks very bad – in both uses of the word. Secondly, the fridge logic kicks in, and someone will wonder how in the world 30,000 whatevers (which still remain undefined) walked out the door with anyone, which hits your credibility on whether you can be trusted with other decisions if what you said is, in fact, true.

I know this corporate PR thing is a lot harder than it looks for people who can't be bothered to understand how it works, but them's the breaks.

I was going to assume that you were going to tell me that a lot of revenue is actually channeled through that silly magazine of yours (really, a magazine in this day and age), because at least the layout and photography seems to have some pretty high production value going behind it – but even that seemed incredibly silly, given the scale of the claim that you're making.

Ultimately, this comes across from the side that is supposed to be professional more like a bad case of vaguebooking, and I think we all get plenty of that elsewhere.

You either need to make your case where you assert it, do it well, and don't be twats about it, or decline to make the accusation at all.

Frankly, I think the assumption in most of the world is that pretty much anyone involved in cryptocurrency's a scammer until convinced otherwise, and I'm not entirely unsure that more than 60% of the people involved in cryptocurrency don't think exactly the same thing. But the one thing we can all agree on is that you can't just step up and smear someone without actually dropping some facts and proof by sheer naked assertion while simultaneously saying things which don't accord with anything like reality when it comes to credibility.

$0.07

thirdstryker1 (57) · 7 years ago

The market doesn't care what you think of the website. If Core Media continue their operations then they are filling some kind of demand. From my time in Core Media, they were a profitable business. If they are profitable, they are filling demand. That is basic economics. The marketplace comprises of millions of people who have subjective values and your opinion is only one of them.

$0.00

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

A lot of companies manage to continue operation without actually being profitable. A lot of companies manage to continue operation without being profitable while a number of freelancers and even very core employees know nothing about it.

But very few companies deliberately choose to set as their public face in part of the numinous field in which they operate a substandard form of presentation. They most certainly don't make that the locus of informing other people in whatever community about someone they think is a bad actor. And on top of that, they most certainly don't make the ostensible information about someone they think is a bad actor not actually present on the site after they specifically linked to it.

So, you'll forgive me, if I don't come along on your unsupported fantasy about whether they are profitable or not. I am way too familiar with how borderline companies can present themselves both internally and externally as profit-centers without being anywhere near that.

The marketplace is comprised of millions of people who have subjective values – most of whom have no experience in any field that you would care to name. Their subjective values are shaped by what they can perceive, and while it would be a fools errand to try and speak for all of them, it's certainly possible to speak for an educated portion of the market space.

So when I say something looks particularly bad, that means that it looks particularly bad to a skilled and experienced part of the market. If that is strangely threatening to you, if that makes you uncomfortable – then good. There's potential for you to become part of that skilled and experienced part of the market.

The presence that Core Media has as part of this particular public showing doesn't create a feeling of a company which is doing well. It reads a lot like misplaced ego. The corporate presence reads like a shack shop that thinks it's uptown. These are not good traits.

If you have a problem with that, perhaps you should take it up with them.

$0.07

thirdstryker1 (57) · 7 years ago (edited)

$0.00

lorilikes (53) · 7 years ago

I am saddened to see that you joined the ranks of the anti Lori campaign, @Thirdstryker1. I always have known you as a reasonable, fair person. I am surprised that you would assume you have the whole truth. You clearly do not, but I am not inclined to badmouth people, especially this way.

No matter what has happened, every last one of you should have had the decency and the common sense to consider that maybe reality as you have been shown is skewed. Perhaps I am not “a bad actor”. I have nothing of secret in my world- and you guys really showed NO basic due diligence before loudly bashing your bewildered, former ally.
Throwing criminal accusations around as if they are simple insults seems sloppy and cruel.

Never has my heart been so genuinely immersed in something I loved doing - only to become the cast away from the few people who I considered friends.
It’s this bandwagon behavior that we are supposed to be against.🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑
Do you guys mind behaving in a civilized way? What’s up with the the angry mob coming at all angles?
🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑🐏🐑
Don’t be sheeple. Think for yourself. Ask questions before ruining someone next time.
I am a distant person for you guys but from here, I am a mom, engaged to be married next year after loss you wouldn’t believe, and I have seen enough tragic shit in the last few years to fill a book. Still, nothing has been quiet as devastating as you all turning on me. Especially my mentor, the leader, the boss. Painful. 🥀
Be better than typical. I am no monster.
😭

$0.00

thirdstryker1 (57) · 7 years ago

$0.00

lextenebris (62) · 7 years ago

If you're referring to the article which they finally have readable on the site – there's no proof.

In fact, a canny, thoughtful reader will come away from that feeling as though they have been misled.

Oh, sure, they make the assertion that Lori stole tens of thousands of dollars from them. They assert that quite aggressively. They don't actually talk about and what position she must've been to have access to that kind of funds, nor do they actually say that they are going to pursue criminal charges against her – as someone would who had tens of thousands of dollars which, theoretically, would impact day-to-day operations for a media operation would do.

All they do is assert that this bad thing happened, that she did it, that they're not going to tell us what happened, nor are they going to actually use the criminal justice system as it's designed in order to pursue what is not a small amount of money, but instead are just going to mildly smear her reputation.

Does that really, truly, come across to you as a company from which tens of thousands of dollars in operating funds have been embezzled? Seriously, this is a real question. If you come to this sort of announcement and have to judge the truth of it, absent any actual proof in the document itself, absent any engagement with the legal system absent any sort of supporting evidence, do you really come away with belief in complete truth of the accusation?

Because if so, you are probably going to have a very bad time pretty much anywhere. If that is the level of accusation and the support thereof that it requires to convince you of a capital crime, then I have this bridge in San Francisco that I can let you have cheap. While I'm at it, I'll sell you chunks of concrete which I guarantee came from the dynamited alien landing platform at Area 51.

I'm saying you'd be gullible, is what I'm saying. I'm saying your judgment would be more than questionable.

No one has to convince you that they are innocent in the mere presence of accusation. Accusations are cheap and easy. They typically cost the accuser nothing; there is almost no risk for making an accusation. If you are going to put the burden of proof, all proof, on the accused, you have made a decision which is going to end poorly for you in your life going forward.

And that's sad.

I am always willing to look at proof. I love proof. I'm willing to believe proof. I'm also willing to believe that people lie; all people lie. Accusers lie.

An extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. We have the claim – but we have no evidence. Get back to me when that happens and maybe we'll have something to talk about.

$0.00

lorilikes (53) · 7 years ago

The differerence is what I have in “evidence” is very damaging to my former friend, and despite the battle that has ensued, I won’t intentionally harm someone

$0.00

thirdstryker1 (57) · 7 years ago (edited)

This is all a word salad, just give me evidence you didn't steal the funds. Lori you made a poor error in judgement, either you prove you didn't steal the funds or you protect your friend. You must choose one. If you don't give us evidence I will continue to believe you stole the funds. That is life.

$0.00

lorilikes (53) · 7 years ago (edited)

I think you should re-examine the evidence already provided to you. Then ask yourself who was actually the affected parties. You will discover that the person who suffered loss was House. Only. Not his company, not my clients... only House. I came to him with my confession of what had happened and he acted accordingly, to what he thought was the right thing to do, and everyone who was a client was, with my help, handled fairly and everyone ended up with MORE than what they even paid for in services. That being said, I feel that what transpired was between me and House. I truly made up for it- and beyond. I am not some thief, salivating with greed. Word salad is my way of protecting the remaining dignity of my own and for my former friend who didn’t show me the same courtesy. Think what you want but I suggest being courteous at least and doing some due diligence before reporting falsely that fraud was committed. It wasn’t.

$0.00