It is with a degree of humility that I write this since I am Stem user in the form of a content creator only.
Quite frankly, us users need to get over our self-importance. I know this is going to upset some people but the simple fact of the matter is, at this point, users are secondary on the Steem blockchain.
I know this is astonishing to most but this is where things are at. Over time, that will change yet not now.
The other day I used the analogy of driving a car. It matters none how good a driver you are (writer), how nice your car is (content), or how fast it can go. If there are no roads, the construction people are of much greater priority.
Steem has very few roads at this point. That means those building them, the developers are front and center.
Too many want to approach Steem like they do the rest of the social media world. People are expecting a finished product. It is far from that. Basically, anyone on here right now putting up content is a test case. That is all we are. It is our job to try out the applications that are created. It is through our actions that bugs are found. We are the mice in the laboratory.
Everything is basically in Beta.
Few remember the early days of the Internet. Life pre-browser was a nightmare from what I hear. The average person had no chance of interacting in that arena. Circa 1993 meant we were looking at another 5 years before any major numbers started to hit the Internet.
For all the heat that Ethereum takes, do you know what they have? Developers and a lot of them. That blockchain probably has more DApps then all the other blockchains combined. I recently read their developers number in the hundreds of thousands. This includes all those working on ways around the scaling problems via layer 2 and sidechains.
I am always happy to see larger approval numbers and newer people participating. This is because I feel being an early adopter is going to be of huge benefit to each individual on here. Yesterday, I put up a post telling how I used some fiat to buy STEEM and power up. I truly feel the long term future of this blockchain is incredible.
However, I realize millions of accounts means nothing. I do not care about 20K daily active posters and getting that to 100K. What is most important is taking the number of developers on here and tripling it in the next 6 months. That is what will really "moon" this thing.
Having a blockchain that can transact an incredible speeds means nothing if there is nobody using it. Without transactions, the speed of a blockchain is akin to a tree falling in the woods and nobody hearing it. It matters none.
People should go back and look at the archived versions of Google and Facebook when they first came out. Then, couple that with the user rates at that time. Do you think Zuckerberg was really concerned about the fact he had only 50K when he was running it at Harvard? Certainly, what was online then was a shadow of what Facebook is today.
Of course, blockchain is infrastructure while Facebook is an application but you get the point. We are in the Geek Zone and they are the ones running they show. They need to work their magic and the rest of us get to play in their sandbox while they are building things. Every single application that is on here right now, if there is any kind of development team behind it, will be radically different in a couple years. At the same time, we have seen only a smidgen of the total number of applications that eventually end up on here.
It does not matter if one has 500K or 50 SP. Do you know what is going to make it very valuable? It is not what you and 500 of your friends post. What will make it valuable is what 500 developers create. That is what tracks the attention of the masses.
Without development this place is like a bar on Sunday morning: completely empty.
Do you want a blockchain that has 50M or 100M people on it? Then realize it is not going to happen by the users. Even if the content posted here was epic, Gone with the Wind type stuff, it would not matter. If I worked my ass off to try and get people here, I might be able to get 30 or 40 in a year. Even the most sociable person might be able to refer 100 or so in a year. @actifit already has 151 claimed accounts and I know they used some to onboard users already. @steemhunt has 1,842.
That is the power of the applications and that only comes about from developers.
It is often posted on here how people need to be patient. That is the golden rule. Anyone who was around in the early days of the Internet knows how vital that is. That took years to get to the point where it was even somewhat able to be used by non-techy people. Steem is around 2.5 years old and people expect it to operate like other social media networks that have more than a decade under their belts.
That is completely insane.
The truth of the matter is that me, you, and the other 20K users could leave here tomorrow and Steem would do just fine as long as the developers keep hacking away at code. There are 7B people in the world with 3.4B (roughly) already online. Users are not going to be the problem as long as there is something interesting for them to use.
I feel fortunate to be here at this point. I would rather be user #318,110 as opposed to user #30,000,000. Over time, as a guinea pig for the applications, I can accumulate STEEM Power and build up my account. At some point, Minnow is going to be a tough category to break into since STEEM will keep getting harder to amass. This is why I believe those with as little as 100 SP are going to be very, very happy campers down the road.
Patience. Patience. Patience.
Steem has the potential to be one of the top blockchains. However, the only way we will get there is if the developers create some really amazing applications that gets the interest of the masses. That is how we will see user numbers into the hundreds of millions.
In the meantime, in addition to testing out all the apps to help the developers work out the bugs, we can take 30 seconds to upvote STEEM in our effort to get it listed on Netcoins.
https://busy.org/exit?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcontest.gonetcoins.com%2F
Users, marketers, promoters, and everyone else will have their time. Right now, it is up to those who are creating applications that are up to bat. We can't get to the next level until they do their thing.
Patience. Patience. Patience.
If you found this article informative, please give an upvote and resteem.
I don't agree.
Yes, of course technological progress, the comings SMTs and many new dapps are fascinating, but the core of a social media platform are the people who keep it alive. Without humans the 'social' part is missing, and that's essential:
If I try to convince friends, who are using facebook, to give Steemit (/STEEM) a chance, their answer is NOT
"Oh, no, Steemit is beta only, not comfortable to use, whereas facebook is sooo advanced from a technological point of view."
No, instead of that most of them say:
"All my friends are using facebook, so I need it to stay in touch with all of them!"
The main advantage of facebook are NOT genius programmers or an unbelievable advanced website.
No, instead of that its success is based on the huge amount of people using it! That makes it so difficult to beat facebook.
The STEEM blockchain will only be successful if 'normal' people feel welcomed by friendly humans (not spammers and bots only), if they notice that real humans are reading their posts and upvoting them, if they don't get flagged immediately when making any mistake or even just because of a different opinion, if they don't see bot boosted spam posts dominating the trending page and whales shamelessly exploiting the reward pool.
We should care about the current user base, otherwise (inspite of the technological progress) I am not really optimistic concerning the future of STEEM.
On the one side I like your optimism (also in my eyes STEEM is still fascinating and based on fantastic, creative ideas), on the other side I think the image you paint of the current state of STEEM is somewhat too euphemistic.
P. S.: Here I just noticed another example for the importance of an engaged user base ...
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
one part of this article I guess is correct: "Users Are Secondary" - that's right!
and I'm truly glad to get this confirmation of my own conclusions 😃
and I do get the main message: "Patience" 👍
although that is simple fact - however, @jaki01, I tend to agree with your disagreement with post author's assessment that it should be so. my own views on the current state of affairs are similar to yours.
Well said - correct! 👍
System is made in such a way that it is basically "Re-distribution of Wealth"
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are correct. Absolutely correct. I bought my first desktop in 1980. If you think pre browser was tough, you didn't live through pre mouse. Everything was keystrokes and you had a couple hundred commands that you had to remember and be conversant with and literally thousands that you had to be able to look up in the manual. Because on board storage simply didn't exist.
We need more Devs. More competent devs would be really good. You and I know that this is the very early days of what will be a complete social 'reload'. Whether or not Steem is one of the survivors is utterly dependent on them.
We need users, too. Those who are willing to push the buttons and break stuff without tossing a fit and leaving.
I am really fortunate to have lived through three complete social revolutions in my life. I hope to live long enough to see this one bear fruit and where it is actually headed.
Thanks as always for your straight shooting posts. I really do appreciate them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your latest blogs have been very motivating for me. I've been on here over 2 years and had the very lucky chance of being spoiled by a whale bot who upvoted every one of my posts for 1.5 years. He left the platform and I had to change my entire view of steeming. I have some ideas floating around in my head for contributing to steemit to make it a better place.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You are right indeed, but of course it's a two way streets.
Without real users to use Steem you won't find many developers willing to develop software for Steem.
So both users and developers are needed.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
i'll buy that for a nickel, ty
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think Steem is well on its way to achieve its ecosystem growth through DApps as I believe it already has more DApps with more than 300 users thatbmost blockchains out there. This will continue to grow as developers see the success of many today like @steemmonsters.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@taskmaster4450 My Favorite Hashtag is #steemwillmakeyourich .............I really feel that anyone that has been here over the past Year or Two and keeps Powering Up Steem will be very very Happy in the next 2-3 years..........
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Great post man and very interesting perspective. It's exciting times right now for sure and I think you've got a good point about who the stars of the show are right now. The masses expect perfectly running, bright shiny user friendly applications and won't take this place seriously without that.
I think it's very emotional for a lot of people when we see a glimmer of hope and get a little taste of freedom and then have to wait and deal with the uncertainty that there is so much of here. Also the blood gets pumping when there's $ in the game :)
Posted using Partiko iOS
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Minnow, Dolphin, Orca, and Whale are all powers of 10, going from a million vests for Minnow to a billion vests for Whale. At some point, we’ll need a name for those who have 100,000 vests.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
great point ☝🏽
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Kraken?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think those might not be smaller than minnows. 😏
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ohhh gosh as a content creator and someone with negative IT skills lol it pain me to agree with You. Lololol but also as a content creator I am trying to slowly slowly change that and try to make it as user friendly as possible.
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Pretty good way to think about it. If we promote Steem as nothing but blogging, we're obviously limiting our reach. DApps like DTube, Steepshot, and even games like Steem Monsters really help onboard new people, but the apps come first in order for this to help.
Getting new users through the registration process is tough though, due to RC. I'm hoping that I'll be able to release a number of games and smaller DApps on Steem in order to build my SP, which I'll then use to get a shit ton of accounts that I can offer out to new Steemians with larger scale apps.
Basically, my plan is going to be: make games for current Steemians -> get SP from that -> use SP to create accounts -> build large scale apps for adoption by outsiders -> use created accounts to make sign-up feel natural -> look back in awe about how great Steem is 2-3 years from now
I hope I'll see you all there :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi @taskmaster4450!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.059 which ranks you at #279 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 1 places in the last three days (old rank 280).
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 225 contributions, your post is ranked at #14.
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I have found the value of tight-knit community more than compensates for flaws in unpolished software.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I had Windows for Workgroups 3.11 and had to download a windows socket (winsock for short) just to be able to connect to the internet. Also "plug and play" didn't exist either. We had to set up our own drivers for hardware. There was no Google in those days. Yahoo! was a link directory.
Dell was just beginning to become prominent among the thousands of different computer companies. I had this large phone book that I ordered computer parts out of. In those days, many people just bought the parts and assembled them together.
I used to use Eudora email and it had PGP built in! Then Phil Zimmerman sold the rights and it had to be taken out. I resisted this change and kept my windows 95/98/Xp systems as long as I could, then finally Windows made it impossible for Eudora 3.0 to run with PGP.
Now everything is done for you and you have to worry if hardware keyloggers have been installed by the NSA. Convenience always comes at an expense.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Amen, we saw the mice in the maze after Dlive left. All of this is truth and people need to realize. I like the “even if we have 100 sp” statement! woot
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Wow @ned referenced your post:
https://steemit.com/gathering/@ned/new-behind-the-scenes-project
https://steemit.com/busy/@taskmaster4450/ned-designing-a-new-user-interface-not-steemit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I totally agree with you that good devs to continue growing this platform are of utmost importance. Community is necessary too though. I know my blogs aren't changing the world, or even MY world, but if you have a creative side and enjoy it, this is the platform for you. If you're here just to hire bots to vote up crappy content (that's what I really don't like about this system) then you're probably going to get discouraged and quit with the price fluctuations. I enjoy creating and I enjoy curating and I'm building my following and my steempower step by step. I'm in for the long haul.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curious to see what will happen to steem in 10 years :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit