Interesting point re burning rewards. I have the potato on auto vote. I’ve been wondering it is a good idea for a little while now. I think I’ll remove it and change it to a 50% flag instead.
I mostly curate as well. Not that interested in creating content these days. Don’t have the time to anyway.
You know what would increase the price? Buyers.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yeah, so what? All that matters is if you know what would make people buy Steem and power up.
Would more "non steem" related content make people power up? Doubt it very much since the stake voted not for bullshit "non steem" content (asspuffer @berniesanders excluded). Would people want to open an account and buy steem because they see "non steem" related content on trending? Idk, I don't care to think what a simp who hasn't heard of our revolutionary system would find "attractive" enough to buy in, especially if they are oblivious to what made people initially join when there was absolutely no content and only the promise of rewards (@berniesanders excluded), but maybe someone cracks the secret to it, so that we moon, because that's all it will be for, so much for freedom of expression, decentralization and transparency, the conversation is forever about dem lambo tokenz. You know what would increase price? The dollar crashing.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The distribution sucks... a low price is fine for now.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
To the moon. . me first.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
True true.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit