Theresa May's Plans for Internet Censorship Suffers Set back

in censorship •  8 years ago  (edited)

Conservatives lose their majority in UK elections but May remains Prime Minister.


As most of you are already aware Theresa May's and her conservative party have been denied a majority and have struck a deal with the Democratic Unionists to form a minority government in Britain. May has vowed to press forward with Brexit despite the wavering public confidence .

In response to the very recent London Bridge attacks, Theresa May called for major restrictions and regulations on internet freedoms and encryption. In essence, the solution to terrorism proposed by the PM was to impose tighter restrictions and create a government regulated internet.

Source:The Independent

It is unclear how the electoral set back will effect the conservatives plans to clamp down on online freedoms.


Proposed Regulations


This, then, is what Theresa May is proposing:

  • All Britons' communications must be easy for criminals, voyeurs and foreign spies to intercept
  • Any firms within reach of the UK government must be banned from producing secure software
  • All major code repositories, such as Github and Sourceforge, must be blocked
  • Search engines must not answer queries about web-pages that carry secure software
  • Virtually all academic security work in the UK must cease -- security research must only take place in proprietary research environments where there is no onus to publish one's findings, such as industry R&D and the security services
  • All packets in and out of the country, and within the country, must be subject to Chinese-style deep-packet inspection and any packets that appear to originate from secure software must be dropped
  • Existing walled gardens (like Ios and games consoles) must be ordered to ban their users from installing secure software
  • Anyone visiting the country from abroad must have their smartphones held at the border until they leave
  • Proprietary operating system vendors (Microsoft and Apple) must be ordered to redesign their operating systems as walled gardens that only allow users to run software from an app store, which will not sell or give secure software to Britons
  • Free/open source operating systems -- that power the energy, banking, ecommerce, and infrastructure sectors -- must be banned outright

Theresa May will say that she doesn't want to do any of this. She'll say that she can implement weaker versions of it -- say, only blocking some "notorious" sites that carry secure software. But anything less than the programme above will have no material effect on the ability of criminals to carry on perfectly secret conversations that "we cannot read". If any commodity PC or jailbroken phone can run any of the world's most popular communications applications, then "bad guys" will just use them. Jailbreaking an OS isn't hard. Downloading an app isn't hard. Stopping people from running code they want to run is -- and what's more, it puts the whole nation -- individuals and industry -- in terrible jeopardy.

That’s a technical argument, and it’s a good one, but you don’t have to be a cryptographer to understand the second problem with back doors: the security services are really bad at overseeing their own behaviour.

Once these same people have a back door that gives them access to everything that encryption protects, from the digital locks on your home or office to the information needed to clean out your bank account or read all your email, there will be lots more people who’ll want to subvert the vast cohort that is authorised to use the back door, and the incentives for betraying our trust will be much more lavish than anything a tabloid reporter could afford.

Source: Boing Boing

This summary illustrates the clear dangers that government back doors create by exposing people's devices to an array of potentially nefarious actors that may seek to exploit the vulnerability.



V4vapid1.png

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

People focus on faces, names and campaign...but let's dig deeper..why do you think she wants to control internet... why most of countries tried or tries to pull this behind our back?! Maybe because on internet you can still find answers and proves from stuff they don"t want us to know or use... look how education system is creating minds that can not think by themselves... - this is only a top of iceberg

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

I completely agree with you. She is just the public face doing the bidding of her masters.

Face of a demon if you if you ask me ;)

Loading...
  ·  8 years ago (edited)

If these Orwellian ideas ever come to fruition (and I hope never...am I being naive or over - positive?) it could very well be a start for the government to try to step in and look in to regulating cryptocurrency. We could be back to the whole corrupt banking system that we want to escape from.

Certainly any notion of freedom will be a fading dream. Are we really going to just let them do this in the name of "security"? In reality, the only reason that the government want to regulate and restrict Internet use is to control every aspect of our lives.

Absolutely, at present the internet is out of their control and they're actively searching for ways to curb internet freedoms. In my opinion, the internet had little or nothing to do with the London Bridge attacks but it provided an opportunity to put forth this agenda.
If a group of terrorists uses a public road to arrive at the scene of an attack, should we then ban all roadways?
They have an agenda and they either wait for an opportunity or create an opportunity in order to push their 'solutions'.

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

More and more freedom is being stolen under the guise of providing "security" to protect the people.
As you said, the London Bridge stabbings had absolutely nothing to do with the Internet. There are other ways to monitor potential criminals/terrorists.
And if they did manage to censor our use of the Internet...it really wouldn't make an iota of difference to the stamping out of terrorism or crime. It would just enslave us. That actually makes us more vulnerable and open to attack.

You are so right, @katdvine
They want to dictate every aspect of our lives in the name of safety and security. Internet should always be free and never under control!

Part of the bigger plan that we're not supposed to know about. 😉

Very well said, @katdvine

They do it in a crafty way so that the public is almost begging them to do it....think false flag events

Lol, you don't fuck with the internet and get away with it.

Good call! I love it when this shit blows up in their faces.

Well said. Proposals are absolutely unacceptable.

LOL.. what a ridiculous collection of unsupportable control grid policies - thanks for sharing the laugh.
I've written a lot recently, as a system engineer and consciousness hacker, about exposing and breaking the mind control that's all around us. To me, voting for government is a trap that cannot result in a win - since no matter who 'wins' you have ended up with 'someone' telling you what to do.. which isn't exactly a healthy situation.
I have a series on this currently and lot's of other relevant content, check out part 1 here if you feel inclined: https://steemit.com/life/@ura-soul/1-or-slave-no-more-tips-for-liberation-of-the-earth-heart-or-introduction-and-a-common-formula-for-our-enslavement

  ·  8 years ago (edited)

Hey, thanks for the link! I just went and browsed your post history and you have a lot of interesting submissions. Looking forward to reading many of them when i get a chance. Now following;)

great, thanks! i am following you too - pleased to meet you :)

Anything that would prevent such repressive regulations is good news to me.

Horrible woman with a stupid unworkable plan.

I dont have many word to say.
But I just want to say.
You are diligent people in many network.
Good luck my friend

no censorship?
awwwwwww.....too bad...so sad.

Truly insidious thoughts! Hope it does not materialize the way you have put it. Sounds like a step in the wrong direction.

Theresa Maybe needs to listen to get people and resign.

North Korea is cut off from the internet
how's it working out for them?

How is she still in control if they don't have a majority anymore ?
IS she just playing at control now, since the lack of a majority would (as far as I understand politics) mean most would be against any law proposition she makes ?