How to Choose the Best .NET Based CMS for Your Company

in cms •  8 years ago  (edited)

With the increasing demands of online customers, companies across the globe look for suitable CMS platforms that would endorse their brands, services and products through a strong online presence. To survive in the market, every business requires offering seamless digital experience using different channels. And for this, it is inevitable to get a Content Management System (CMS) with features that allow you to meet your specific business goals. 

There are plenty of technologies that create the base of licensed and open source CMSes. And a large portion of high performing CMSes is based on Microsoft.NET. Whether looking for an open source or a licensed option for your CMS project, Microsoft.NET offers many options. 

Here are the top 5 licensed and open source CMSes on .NET platform. 

Umbraco – A popular .NET CMS that belongs to open source category. The product is available for free but with paid customer support and training services. It offers neat features like super-clean markup storage, logical content storage, clean API for building an elegant website. 

Kentico – It is a CMS with multi-lingual support, WYSIWYG editor, blogs, workflows, newsletters, full-text search, online modules, web analytics and ecommerce. It is perhaps the best solution for large web farms and websites. 

DotNetNuke – It is one of the leading .NET CMS that comes for free with a number of inbuilt modules and themes. Whether you’re a designer, developer or editor, it offers proper features and tools to help you with your site development project. Even someone with minimum technical background can manage or build a website using DotNetNuke. 

Sitefinity – It features all the necessary functionalities to build a responsive, modern and mobile-friendly website. It also offers exciting features such as drag-n-drop facility for easy site management. 

Sitecore – This is an enterprise-friendly CMS based on .NET. It is a perfect solution for mid to large scale websites. Being a .NET based infrastructure, businesses that already use .NET prefer to use Sitecore.  Sitecore provides wonderful support for web farms and multiple websites using its load-balancing functionalities. 

You should choose a CMS, based on your budget and need. Make sure you can avail all the functionalities you need for your site, as your website reflects the real image of your brand. But what to look for? Let’s have a quick look at the following points. 

• Does your chosen .NET CMS is enough flexible for future amendments in your business requirements?

• Does your preferred CMS allow analytics, personalization and multichannel content?

• Do the functionalities and features offered by your chosen ASP.NET CMS align with your business requirements and goals? If not, then how much customization you need to do?

• Is it simple to integrate the CMS with present systems of your company?

• How would be the future cost upgrade, integration and customization? 

• What would be total cost of ownership (TCO) if each and every expense gets included?

• Would it be simple for existing employees to handle the online assets using this new backend?

• Does the CMS present a long learning curve for you?

These are just some of the nitty-gritty you should keep in mind while choosing a .NET based CMS. 


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I just posted about my Azure Cloud based CMS called Galaxy Cloud CMS. Would LOVE to hear your thoughts or answer any questions!

https://steemit.com/cloud/@innvtv/galaxy-cloud-cms-or-a-flexible-framework-for-the-azure-cloud

Thanks for excellent post.

I like Dotnetnuke and if I'm not mistaken supports all the features that Umbraco, Kentico, Sitefinity & site core have including support for mobile, load balancing,multi-lingual support, WYSIWYG editor, blogs, workflows, newsletters, full-text search, online modules, web analytics and eCommerce!
It has a rich web API and can easily support multiple frameworks like Angular 4 and others. Definitely a sound choice IMHO.