There is an accessibility problem with most content in that the more thought out a post, the less likely that people will read it all- or even understand it.
It might work well to write economic treatises on an Econ blog, but won't fly in a place catering to wide consumer demand for easy-to-digest content.
Now that nobody is reading this, is there any good porn on here OP?
Yup. When you have something important to share, the money shouldn't be a concern. If you're a professional entertainer or marketer, you need to create content that's attractive and digestible. The money is a market signal that tells you whether you're achieving these goals or not.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I think I've died and gone to capitalist heaven.
This has implications for modern adertising as well. These same market signals could be a way to finance modern media and journalism. This is far better than pop-up ads and banners. It remains to be seen how successful the Steemit model is, but I think it could work.
In b4 someone writes an article about this and makes 10,000 steem from it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Yup. We can pay to advertise via conventional media channels or get paid to advertise here, as long as its embedded in otherwise valuable content.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit