MH370: Ask Yourself, Who Has The Means & Motive To Take A Boeing 777 Full Of People And Make It Disappear?

in conspiracy •  8 years ago  (edited)

Malaysia_Airlines_A330_A2A_photo_21500x844-916x515.jpg

On March 8th, 2014 (17:20 UTC, 7 March) we are told that a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200ER airplane (flight MH370 AKA MAS370 AKA M9-MR0) disappeared off the coast of Malaysia shortly after departing Kuala Lumpur International Airport on-route to Beijing Capital International Airport in China. This “disappearing act” stunned the world, and only became more, and more odd as more time passed. Initial reports seemed to point in the direction that the flight had likely crashed in the ocean, most likely due to an electrical fire on board (pure speculation due to lack of facts at the time). As time went on, and the search locations started shifting from location to location to location as contradicting evidence started building, to whole world watched in awe as the international community underwent the largest scavenger hunt in recent history, only to turn up with nothing every single time. Satellite images of possible wreckage were found to be unrelated, and each time a new “probable” crash location was pinpointed, it would yield no actual results. Since then it has faded into the back of our minds as a background noise and most people still assume the plane crashed even though 0 evidence backing up this fact has ever been presented or found. Now we are all adults, so I probably don’t have to explain this to you, but “a plane can’t just disappear”.

Below is a short transcript from Episode 2 of the NBC series “The Event”, to start off with, and help set the tone.

NBC: The Event: S01 E02 - To Keep Us Safe

Transcript - 7mins 45secs - 9mins 45secs
-What do we know?
-The Co-pilot managed to transmit a message before communications went down. The planes pilot, a man by the name of Michael Buchanan was hijacking the aircraft, and apparently planning to crash it into the presidential compound.
-Right now I am less concerned with who tried to kill us, then I am with who saved us. I know what I saw, I saw that plane was coming right as us, and then it wasn't, it vanished.
-We've locked down the air traffic controllers and everyone at Coral Gables that might of seen what happened, and nothing was broadcast live. We're discrediting scattered reports from people in the general vicinity, who are being told that the plane was obscured when it flew into a mid-altitude marine layer. Well... it helps because everyone knows that a plane can't just disappear into thin air. As far as everyone is concerned, flight 514 is still in route to Brazil, while we decide on an alternative narrative to tell the public.
-Meaning a coverup.
-Protecting the country involves the keeping of secrets, Mr. President. It always has and it always will.
-We need to focus on that plane, and the people on it. There must be several hundred of them, what happened? Where are they?
-Mr. President, Mr. Sterling. Sir we have been able to confirm that there is no debris, or signs of the plane in the vicinity of this incident. Now as our satellite redirects come in, we are able to widen our search into neighboring states and continents, but there is one interesting detail. A space born sensor recorded an off the chart blast of electromagnetic radiation in the area, at the exact time that the plane went missing. This is what knocked out all the electronics at the site. The problem is we have no idea what this means.

Full Episode: http://www.nbc.com/the-event/video/to-keep-us-safe/n1893

When it comes to the disappearance of MH370 there are really only 2 possible outcomes. The disappearance was either accidental or it was intentional, each of which could then include a wide variety of actual specific causes. Since an accidental event in this case would of resulted in a crash or landing of the aircraft (not a complete disappearance) until actual wreckage is found the intentional angle tends to fit the situation more than the accidental angle (which the MSM is still pushing for the most part to this day). With the idea that the MH370 event was intentional in some form, we must start by asking the always important question of “Cui Bono” or “Who Benefits”.

Well to start, isn't it amazingly convenient that Malaysia Airlines entire fleet of 777-200ER aircraft (including M9-MRO (MH370) & M9-MRD (MH17)) were quickly approaching their final days in the sky, and were scheduled to be decommissioned before the end of this year to be replaced by newer, and more cost effective aircraft in late 2014 (including the Boeing 777X, Boeing 787 Dreamliner & Airbus A350 XWB).

Malaysia Airlines Fleet
Boeing 777-200ER: Equipped with AVOD in each seat. This aircraft will soon be phased out and will be replaced with the Boeing 777X, Boeing 787 Dreamliner or the Airbus A350 XWB. Phased out by 2015.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysia_Airlines_fleet

Now due to the fact that especially in a post 9/11 world, is it no simple feat to make a large commercial airliner do any of the following things: Divert from its scheduled course, turn off its transponders or dip below radar (or lose radar signal via other methods), let alone completely vanish without a trace for weeks/months on end (yet MH370 did all 4). Because of this we must question not only who has the “ability” to do such things, but also many times more importantly, who has the ability to cover it up from being discovered for any extended length of time such is the case with this (still) missing aircraft.

Enough in the way of misstatements, contradictions and other evidence has emerged from the developing story of ‘lost’ Malaysian Airlines flight 370 to form a case for its disappearance being orchestrated by the West's Military Industrial Complex.
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Well it’s so easy to just willy-nilly blame the Military Industrial Complex for everything that happens right? So let’s look back and think… are there any past events that have occurred, that share a similarity to MH370 in any way that might reaffirm this culprit? Flight off course? Transponders off? Dip below radar (or lose radar signal via other methods)? As you may already notice, these things all closely match some of the events that took place as part of the September, 11, 2001 attacks.

The bizarre zigzag routes followed by MH370 are exactly the sort of flight path demonstrated during the September 11 attacks. On 9/11 we saw the same mysterious switching off, whether remotely or by the pilots, of transponders which should have been reporting the planes’ speed, altitude and position to air traffic control.
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Now for anyone that has done any extensive research into the events that took place on 9/11, you would already be aware that an annual Continuity of Government / Armageddon exercise called Global Guardian, involving the US Strategic Command, the US Space Command, and NORAD was taking place on the morning of the 9/11 attacks. This exercise involved 3 live-fly E-4B doomsday planes and a ground based command centre, all of which were housed at the time by the highest level NORAD brass. Global Guardian then works in conjunction with a joint NORAD exercise called Vigilant Guardian which is designed to create several simulated and/or live-fly dynamic threats to North American airspace (varied from year to year), in which Global Guardian is then too react to and try to defend in real-time. I am not going to go into it now as I want to keep this thread mostly MH370 oriented, but those 2 NORAD sponsored wargames are shown to of had an extremely large role in the overall events that took place on that day. Because of this we must keep a close eye on not only what Washington (NORAD) has to gain, but also what does NATO (NORAD on steroids) interests in general have to gain (cough IMF vs BRICS). The sad truth is a lot more is possible then the powers that be will openly admit to the public, and as many times as it has been proven, most people are still under the assumption that remotely controlling an aircraft in this day and age is not possible. So let’s re-ask the question, can a plane be remotely taken over?

Ultimately do they have the technical capability to 'hack' an airliner's controls and disable avionics, even steer the plane rendering the pilot? If they can do that do they want to release that information to the world?
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Well it turns out that if you were to pick a commercial airliner to remotely take over for some reason, the Boeing 777 would be one of the top choices on the list due to vulnerabilities/flaws in the Automated Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) & Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) of that model of Boeing aircraft.

Boeing 777
As Boeing's first fly-by-wire airliner, it has computer-mediated controls; it is also the first entirely computer-designed commercial aircraft.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_777

Fly-by-wire
Fly-by-wire (FBW) is a system that replaces the conventional manual flight controls of an aircraft with an electronic interface. The movements of flight controls are converted to electronic signals transmitted by wires (hence the fly-by-wire term), and flight control computers determine how to move the actuators at each control surface to provide the ordered response. The fly-by-wire system also allows automatic signals sent by the aircraft's computers to perform functions without the pilot's input, as in systems that automatically help stabilize the aircraft.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fly-by_wire

Fly-by-wire, a term most people are not aware of (RIP Michael Hastings), plus several flaws in system design of that model of Boeing aircraft made MH370 the perfect target for a partially-assisted remote electric hijacking event. A German security consultant/hacker & commercial pilot even tried to warn the world to the dangers of these exploits at the HITB Security Conference held in Amsterdam last year.

Aircraft Hacking - HITB Security Conference
http://conference.hitb.org/hitbsecconf2013ams/materials/D1T1%20-%20Hugo%20Teso%20-%20Aircraft%20Hacking%20-%20Practical%20Aero%20Series.pdf
Video:

Researcher shows how to hack (and crash) a passenger aircraft with an Android phone...
The results of Teso's hard work are terrifying. Firstly, the Automated Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B), which is a surveillance technology for tracking aircraft, has no security. The United States government will require all aircraft to be equipped with ADS-B by the year 2020 - however, the system has been proven to be unencrypted and unauthenticated. Teso's presentation stated that the attacks on this system "range from passive attacks (eavesdropping) to active attacks (message jamming, replaying, injection)".
Secondly, the Aircraft Communications Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS) - which is used for exchanging messages between aircraft and stations via radio or satellite - also has no security. Teso pointed out that anyone with a little knowledge can read and send ACARS messages - and it may be as simple as purchasing some hardware from eBay.
Using a lab of virtual planes based on real aircraft codes, Teso gave a practical demonstration of how to use ACARS to upload Flight Management System (FMS) data. Once in, he was able to manipulate the steering of a Boeing jet in 'autopilot' mode, and said he could make oxygen masks drop down, and even cause the plane to crash by setting it on a collision course with another plane.

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/researcher-shows-how-to-hack-and-crash-a-passenger-aircraft-with-an-android-phone-8569117.html

Hacker says phone app could hijack plane
Using a flight simulator, Teso showed off the ability to change the speed, altitude and direction of a virtual airplane by sending radio signals to its flight-management system. Current security systems don't have strong enough authentication methods to make sure the commands are coming from a legitimate source, he said.
"You can use this system to modify approximately everything related to the navigation of the plane," Teso told Forbes after his presentation. "That includes a lot of nasty things."

http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/11/tech/mobile/phone-hijack-plane/

Using these exploits it was shown that someone with enough knowledge of the 777 flight systems is able bypass various safeguards, making it possible to remotely send a signals directly to the flight management system via ACARS, which then is able to send seemingly legitimate commands to the airplanes fly-by-wire system and other systems, allowing for remote access via loophole (which also overrides manual pilot controls as well). To do something like this you would simply need to customize the signal for the specific plane/system in question, and then transmit the various remote commands to the target via wireless signal. And as it turns out...

The US has several airbases around the Indian Ocean and South China Sea from which they operate the most advanced electronic warfare gadgetry in the world. Both from specialist warships and electronic warfare pods and installations on a variety of aircraft from the lumbering AWACS battle control planes to fighter jets.
Former scientific adviser to the UK Home Office Dr. Sally Leivesley was quoted by London’s Sunday Express on March 16 as saying, “hackers could change the plane’s speed, altitude and direction by sending radio signals to its flight management system. It could then be landed or made to crash by remote control.” She floated the possibility that this could be the world’s first cyber-hijack.

http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

So it seems remotely hijacking an aircraft, especially in MH370’s case may be easier than most would think. The issue is, as it turns out, taking control of the aircraft via remote is the easy part… but making it disappear without a trace (having MANY ways to be tracked) is a feat that is better saved for someone like David Copperfield. If the plane were taken over via remote by MOST powers in the world, it would only be temporary… the aircraft would be tracked down in very short order. It really isn’t easy in this day and age to make an airplane disappear without a trace. To avoid being tracked by radar an aircraft would have to dip below radar tracking altitude (which MH370 appears to of done for 90%+ of its flight), but there was a short period of time that MH370 was at radar tracking altitude, yet wasn’t being seen. What could of caused this (cough back to NATO)?

NATO Joint Electronic Warfare Core Staff (JEWCS)
NATO JEWCS provides SACEUR and ACO subordinate commands with Electronic Warfare (EW) expertise and training in support of the planning and execution of NATO operations and exercises. In addition, JEWCS, under the direction of SHAPE, supports NATO HQ, SACEUR and SACT in the development of EW policy, doctrine, concepts and experimentation.
Based at the Royal Naval Air Station at Yeovilton, UK, experts from JEWCS support Command & Control Warfare exercise play; assist NATO Reaction
Forces and other formations prepare for all forms of operations; and provide a cadre of experienced EW personnel at high readiness to deploy to assist the planning and conduct of NATO operations.
Using sophisticated equipment, JEWCS staff can simulate known threat emitters, jam and spoof radars, navigation and communication equipment to provide a realistic and challenging exercise environment for participants.

http://www.aco.nato.int/page208304257.aspx

And it turns out NATO holds these JEWCS aimed exercises fairly often, most of which do not impact live commercial flights in any direct way… but coincidentally recently there seems to be evidence that although these type of exercises haven’t been known to impact commercials flights in the past, they do still have the ability to if someone with the authority wanted to. This was further brought to light when an 'unprecedented' incident involving 13 separate commercial aircraft occurred, where the aircraft's seemingly vanished off of all radar tracking screens (they were still being tracked by transponders so there was no serious threat in these cases) in several different countries, for a period of time ranging up to 25 minutes. These events occurred on 2 different days in early June of this year.

Investigation under way after 13 planes mysteriously vanish from radars in Europe for 25 MINUTES in 'unprecedented' incident
A total of 13 aircraft suddenly vanished off radars for about 25 minutes on two occasions while flying over Austria, it has been revealed.
In what is being billed as 'unprecedented' circumstances, the incidents on June 5 and yesterday saw the flight data disappear from air controller screens.
Austria's flight safety organization admitted that the height, location and other information for a total of 13 aircraft mysteriously vanished from radars.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-2656385/Flights-briefly-vanish-Austrian-air-traffic.html

Again knowing this isn’t something that can just happen by accident, people started asking what could be the cause of these radar oddities. NATO has denied all involvement in the 13 aircraft oddity, even though all the evidence points to a JEWCS exercise being involved in both cases. This was then confirmed by Slovak authorities that stated that a 2 week electronic warfare exercise being ran in the area was the cause (they didn’t specially mention NATO, but you can do the math).

Military blamed after planes vanish from Europe air-traffic control screens
Slovak authorities claim electronic warfare exercise caused dozens of planes to briefly disappear from air-traffic control radar
Dozens of aircraft briefly vanished from air-traffic control radars in Austria, Germany, the Czech Republic and Slovakia over the last two weeks in incidents that Slovak authorities blamed on military electronic warfare exercises.
Air-traffic controllers in Austria and Germany said data about the planes' position, direction, height or speed went missing on 5 and 10 June, but the outages posed no serious danger to aircraft traveling at high altitude.
Their Czech and Slovak counterparts also encountered cases of vanishing aircraft on the same days.
"The disappearance of objects on radar screens was connected with a planned military exercise which took place in various parts of Europe … whose goal was the interruption of radio communication frequencies," the Slovak air traffic services said.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/13/military-blamed-planes-vanish-europe-air-traffic-control-radar

All this again was even further confirmed by Reuters, ironically quoting a NATO officer, which stated the fact that NATO (JEWCS branch in this specific case) were running 2 separate exercises related to “localized and low-power jamming” of radar signals in the same general areas that the commercial aircraft were to of seemingly disappeared. The exercises ran from June 2-6 near Hungary (1st radar oddity being June 5), and June 9-20 near Italy (2nd radar oddity being June 10)

The NATO military officer said that the alliance carried out some training that involved “localized and low-power jamming” in the skies over Hungary during exercises on June 2-6 and that it is currently conducting similar training in southern Italy from June 9-20.
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/06/16/367181/nato-not-behind-europe-radar-problems/
(Reuters also have an article if you don't trust PressTv)

But the issue is there are simply too many things on an aircraft that can be tracked, that taking over the plane via remote and making it vanish from radar (by either means) is only a small part of the overall battle of making a plane completely vanish. And go figure, it turns out MH370 didn’t disappear out of nowhere, it disappeared in several stages (radar/transponders/engine tracking/cell phones/…) all of which stopped sending their signals at different times. And it turns out some of the tracking indicates that the plane flew for over 5 hours after it first vanished from radar (followed closely by it turning off its transponder).

On Thursday, March 13, came Rolls Royce’s surprise announcement that the Boeing 777’s two Trent engines had been running for five or so hours after the plane was ‘lost’.
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

MH370: US officials say plane sent signals 'hours' after losing contact – live
Malaysia Airlines appears to have played down reports that Rolls-Royce, the engine makers of the missing plane, may have received two sets of data on its whereabouts.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/blog/2014/mar/13/mh370-no-sign-of-debris-detected-by-chinese-satellite-live-updates

Not to mention the oddities surrounding the passenger’s cell phones being able to receive a signal for hours after the plane was thought to of crashed (which would require them to be turned on & not be destroyed, and be at a low enough altitude & close enough to a relay to get an actual signal, none of which make sense if the aircraft crashed in the middle of the Ocean).

Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370: Passengers' Mobile Phones Ring But Not Answered
According to China.org.cn, 19 families have signed a joint statement saying that their family members' cell phones connected, but the calls hung up. The relatives have asked Malaysia Airlines to reveal any information they might be hiding, seeking an explanation for the eerie phone connections. The relatives have complained that the Malaysina Airlines is not responding as actively as it should.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/missing-malaysia-airlines-flight-mh370-passengers-mobile-phones-ring-not-answered-1439560

When the initial reports started coming out, no one knew which way to look. Flight tracking appeared to show the aircraft going off course to the east shortly before going off radar, but just before disappearing from radar corrected itself back towards the direction it was coming from. Evidence seems to show that the aircraft did in fact change directions drastically just before dropping off radar and moment’s later turning off its transponder.

The Malaysian government does not have the most sophisticated satellite and radar surveillance systems and it took several days for them to admit that they had indeed tracked MH370 back in a westerly direction across the Malay Peninsula.
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Flight MH370 disappeared 120 miles after crossing BACK over Malay Peninsula flying at just 4,000 feet - claim officials
Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 disappeared from military radar about 120 nautical miles after it crossed back over the Malay Peninsula, it has emerged.
New information about the last known movements of the missing plane have been released and offer further clues to its mysterious demise.
The Boeing 777, carrying 239 passengers and crew, descended to between 4,000 and 5,000 feet, according to a senior Malaysian government official.
The Malay Peninsula is the stretch of land to the west of Malaysia containing the southern tip of Myanmar and southern Thailand.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/flight-mh370-disappeared-120-miles-3400656

It is also interesting to note that the co-pilot attempted to make a cell phone call while on-board the airplane, ~30 minutes after they had lost contact with the aircraft (which is about the time the plane would have been passing over the Malay Peninsula headed towards the Indian Ocean… My thoughts are the co-pilot was not involved and was trying to make contact due to knowing something weird was happening by this time (as they weren’t landing at the first safe location like regular protocol of an issue/threat would dictate)).

Malaysia Airlines MH370 co-pilot's phone 'was on and made contact with network tower' 30 minutes after plane turned around
The mobile phone belonging to the co-pilot of the missing Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 was switched on and made contact with a network tower 30 minutes after the plane is believed to have turned back, it has been reported.
A US official, citing information from Malaysian investigators, has told CNN that a network communications tower in Penang, Malaysia, detected first officer Fariq Abdul Hamid’s mobile as it searched for signal.
The official repeated the claims of Malaysia’s acting transport minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, that despite reports at the weekend there was no evidence the phone actually tried to make a call.
But the details do appear to reaffirm the suggestions from radar and satellite data that the plane had been flown off course and was staying low enough that it could obtain signal from a cell-phone tower, CNN reported.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-mh370-copilots-phone-was-on-and-made-contact-with-network-tower-30-minutes-after-plane-turned-around-9262025.html

So let me understand this, the plane which at the time of going off course was ~30-45 mins into its flight, went off course (east) and then dropped off radar, turned off its transponder, and drastically changed orientation the exact opposite direction it was heading when last seen on radar. It then flies without communication for ~30-45 mins again to then be tracked flying right over the Malay Peninsula headed west? Interesting! Now again we must keep in mind that most tracking element that were not easy to just shut off while mid flight (such as the Boeing engine tracking) still showed the plane being active and running intact for another ~5 hours after that. Well what a coincidence; that is basically the exact amount of time it takes to get from its last recorded location (over the Malay Peninsula, north of where it originally took off), to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean (what are the odds!).

Note: I just wanted to point out that GLP was reporting this aspect, literally just hours after the event was first reported. It took the MSM 2+ months to somewhat catch up to what was being discussed on GLP on the same day of the event.

Diego Garcia
Diego Garcia is a tropical, footprint-shaped coral atoll located south of the equator in the central Indian Ocean. It is part of the British Indian Ocean Territory (BIOT).
The United States Navy operates Naval Support Facility (NSF) Diego Garcia, a large naval ship and submarine support base, military air base, communications and space-tracking facility, and an anchorage for pre-positioned military supplies for regional operations aboard Military Sealift Command ships in the lagoon.
Airport type: Naval Air Facility
Owner: British Territory of the United Kingdom
Operator: MoD, Her Majesty's Government

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Garcia

When this was originally brought out as a highly probably final location for MH370, the shills came in force saying that the runway in Diego Garcia wasn’t long enough for a 777-200ER to land at, but this has since been confirmed not be the case.

FBI analyse Malaysian Airlines pilot's home flight simulator as it's revealed he deleted data one month prior to taking control of missing MH370 plane.
Today it was also revealed that a remote island in the middle of the Indian Ocean with a runway long enough to land a Boeing 777 was programmed into the home flight simulator of the pilot of the missing Malaysia Airlines plane.
Police are now urgently investigating whether Captain Zaharie Ahmad Shah had practised landing at Diego Garcia, an island south of the Maldives occupied by the US navy.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584123/Revealed-Malaysian-Airlines-pilot-high-security-US-base-Diego-Garcia-programmed-homemade-flight-simulator-deleted-data-just-taking-control-missing-plane.html

Diego Garcia may be identified as an ETOPS (Extended Range Twin Engine Operations) emergency landing site (en route alternate) for flight planning purposes of commercial airliners. This allows twin-engine commercial aircraft (such as the Airbus A330, Boeing 767 or Boeing 777) to make theoretical nonstop flights between city pairs such as Perth and Dubai (9,013.61 km or 5,600.80 mi), Hong Kong and Johannesburg (10,658 km or 6,623 mi) or Singapore and São Paulo (15,985.41 km or 9,932.87 mi), all while maintaining a suitable diversion airport within 180 minutes' flying time with one engine inoperable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diego_Garcia

It was then reported by a newspaper in the Maldives that multiple residence of the area, on the day of MH370 disappearance, saw a large commercial aircraft flying overhead at an extremely low altitude, heading towards the south.

Then on Tuesday, March 18, came reports from a small Maldives newspaper 'Haveeru' that half a dozen islanders had first heard and then seen a ‘jumbo jet’ flying very low. To quote the paper: “They said that it was a white aircraft, with red stripes across it – which is what the Malaysia Airlines flights typically look like, and it was heading in a southerly direction.”
http://rt.com/op-edge/lost-airliner-malaysia-nato-china-365/

Image: MH370 (M9-MR0), Feb, 8, 2014 (1 month prior to disappearing):

Map: Maldvies / Diego Garcia
https://www.google.ca/maps/dir/Diego+Garcia/Maldives/@-2.669161,70.7796204,7z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m13!4m12!1m5!1m1!1s0x249273fe6d69b0ad:0x3b3c07570eb0d1c5!2m2!1d72.4228556!2d-7.3195005!1m5!1m1!1s0x24b599bfaafb7bbd:0x414509e181956289!2m2!1d73.5361034!2d1.977247

So it seems that Diego Garcia is actually a more probable (initial) location for MH370 then most people were at the time willing to admit. Now keep in mind remotely controlling an aircraft while in the air, and landing it via remote are 2 totally different situations (cough as they didn’t need to worry about remotely “landing” anything on 9/11). Because of this someone on board the aircraft itself, would likely of been involved in some way (whether duped or willingly is a debate for another time, and is fairly irrelevant in this case anyways). If someone on board were to be needed/involved (aka turn off transponder, initially divert to signal readiness, pacify passengers & crew, and land the aircraft manually, it would highly likely have to be the either the pilot or co-pilot (although with MH370, all signs seem to point to the pilot).

Captain of missing MH370 flight identified as prime suspect – report
The captain of the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 is now the prime suspect in the ongoing investigation into the plane’s mysterious disappearance, after police found suspicious evidence in his house, according to a media report.
More than three months since the plane disappeared over Southeast Asia, Malaysia’s police force said that following intelligence checks into all people on board Captain Zaharie Shah, 53, was the only one who raised suspicion, according to a report published by The Sunday Times.
Police came to this conclusion after finding a flight simulator in his home with drills rehearsing a flight far out into the southern Indian Ocean and a landing on an island with a short runway, the media report said. The files were deleted from the computer, but experts were able to retrieve them.

http://rt.com/news/167692-mh370-captain-suspect-malaysia/

I guess my point is, when you actually add up all the evidence surrounding MH370's disappearance, it doesn’t match what the overall official story is telling us (as hardly any of this event’s evidence or outcome point directly to what would be expected from a fire & accidental crash). Hell it doesn't even point to a rouge government or group hacking/hijacking either... It stinks of just another NATO scheme to further an overall goal. Anyways I would love peoples opinion or any added details you think are important surrounding the MH370 event in general!


About The Author:
barkey.jpg
My name is Brandon (AKA TruthNow88), I am 35 years old and in live just outside of Toronto in the Great White North known as Canada. I have a 1 year old Cocker Spaniel/Golden Retriever crossbreed named Barkley (otherwise known as Monster... I swear this dogs so hyper it may very well be the key to zero-point energy...). I am a Search Engine Optimization specialist, website designer/analyzer and amateur blogger by day, and a coffee drinking, weed smoking, crypto trading conspiracy theorist by night. I love things that get my brain pumping and am really into politics, economics, world events, conspiracy theories, and more recently cryptocurrencies, as well as TV/movies, travel and I am also a huge fan of comedy in general (as they can't make the world go to war if everyone is laughing). I am somewhat new to the crypto world and Steemit in general but recently decided to try to jump in with both feet and see what happens. So far I am loving the people and concepts that Steemit and the crypto world are creating for the future, and I feel honored to be part of its infancy. Anyways I guess that's about it, and remember let nothing hold you back... FULL STEEM AHEAD!

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!