Propaganda and the big picturesteemCreated with Sketch.

in conspiracy •  7 years ago 

propaganda-banner.png

Lately quite a few people have started to express their concern if everything they hear in the news is actually really true or not.

Most of us grew up with the belief, that the media has some kind of obligation to tell the truth and expose the wrong doing perpetrated by the rich and powerful

Many of us still believe they do just that, at least most of the time.

Historically, the media was used by the government to spread certain news to shape opinions about other countries and to get people to agree with doing stuff, like starting wars.

They usually succeeded.

And that's fine. It's OK to bend the truth a bit if it's for a good cause, right?
It's not really lying, right?
It's the positive intention that counts, right?
And after all, people make honest mistakes, it's only human, right?

To protect the people from too much propaganda, we had a wonderful act called the U.S. Information and Educational Exchange Act of 1948 popularly called the Smith–Mundt Act.

However, this bill was amended with the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act
This Act was introduced by U.S. Congressman Mac Thornberry on May 10, 2012
in the House of Representatives.

The bills purpose is "to authorize the domestic dissemination of information and material about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences".

In other words, it is now legal to spread propaganda and lie to Americans as if they were an enemy nation to further any agenda.

From this moment on, it was not only morally totally OK to spread propaganda, but also perfectly legal.

Since May 2012 the media does not break any laws by lying to you anymore, they have the perfect right to spread disinformation, it is legal

So, I am not making a statement whether the news are true or not or if certain events actually happened or not.
What I am saying is, they can tell you what the hell they want, it is all legal propaganda.

As legal as taxes, tickets, asset forfeiture, no knock warrants and killing unarmed people.

Whether they take your money to finance their wars, or if they fine you for not wearing a seat belt, if you go to jail for collecting rain water, if they take your stuff and call it "asset forfeiture", if they are spying on you, vaccinate you, microwave you, pollute your air, water and food - it is all legal.
And so is lying to you.

So, if someone points out that not everything the media reports is actually true,
he is not your savior who finally speaks the truth,
he is just screwing with your mind.

The media actually does exactly what it was designed to do.
To program you.
To create opinions, to induce fear, to rile up people against each other, to divide and conquer.
To make people angry and then use their anger to establish even tougher laws.
To normalize agendas through constant repetition until you are OK with something

The real question is not, whether anything reported in the media is true or not

The real question is:

Why are they telling us this NOW?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

All of that you said is really true about the use of media and these rules of government impact our lives.

Well, they can actually do with us whatever the hell they want.
As George Carlin said: "And nobody notices, nobody cares..."

I know why know one cares because it's our problem, we have to solve it.

Well, I suppose this is exactly what most of us here in this forum are doing.
Trying to wake people up and spread the truth...

Damn straight! Gotta spread some light really quick too bc people who are unconscious will just go with the crowd and take everyone of us off the cliff like lemmings. It is such a crucial time right now. Serious Game On for all sides.

Well said :)

Thanks, I just posted about this a few days ago... there is a blueprint for mind control and it is very simple: https://steemit.com/mindcontrol/@jamestrue/a-simple-blueprint-for-mind-control

You tell us, @herrleeb, why now in your opinion? 100% Upvoted

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Well, I don't know.
But I think we have to ask the "why now" question any time any thing of importance is reported.
Thanks for the upvote my friend!

Absolutely. Cui bono:
"Cui bono", literally "for whose benefit?", is a Latin phrase which is still in use as a key forensic question in legal and police investigation: finding out who has a motive for a crime- Wikipedia

Right. But there is also the issue if Hegelian Dialectic...problem, reaction, solution.
The real intentions are often hidden :)

Yea, we have to spiral down through the layers and catch a glimpse of the monster at the bottom of the pit. I do, however, also truly think there is a change happening on the planet that truly is positive. we each do our part to build on that change and be conduits for the Truth Vibrations

I really, really hope that you are right.
Just let's continue putting the truth out there wherever we can.
I don't want to go down without a fight anyway :)

Yes! "Hold the line!"

good night, my friend...going to bed now. I am an old fart and need my beauty sleep to fight off the chemtrails :)

Rich people don't buy the media to make money. Media is its own money.

Great article, @herrleeb.
My distrust for the media has only strengthened with time. When there's an incentive, the human element will always prevail.

Thank you!

I keep on shaking my head what is going on, on the other side of the moon 🙈

Really???

The bills purpose is "to authorize the domestic dissemination of information and material about the United States intended primarily for foreign audiences".
In other words, it is now legal to spread propaganda and lie to Americans as if they were an enemy nation to further any agenda.

Well, since 2012 propaganda is perfectly legal in the US of A.
If even Wikipedia says it it must be true, right?
It's not funny anymore...

because this is the culmination of 50 years of the marxist push.

And it's now or never (for generations at least).

The lies are being seen, that socialism has no clothes.

And 'they' have no where to go, if (when) this fails.

Just my opinion..

I truly hope you are right.
But honestly, I have little hope.
Too much fluoride in the water. we are overwhelmed with so many issues and 80% of the people are still sound asleep.

gotta fight the 'little hope' - that's cultural marxism winning. They ain't paying rent, don't let them live in your head! lol

people are waking up quicker then ever, because of the communications nowadays.

(look at the US msm - its collapsing in a few months after decades of 'rock solid')

Well, again, I hope that you are right.
But from my perspective it get's harder and harder.
Censorship is rampant on youtube and facebook, in Europe people are being jailed for speaking out and most of the people I know don't even want to hear the truth because it rattles their world. I wrote an article about this issue. Check it out...
https://steemit.com/chemtrails/@herrleeb/chemtrails-and-the-big-picture

It will get harder yet matey - be ready for it coming- not depressed by it coming..

The west haven't known what fighting is, in our generation - it's concept to read about, over the latest news report.

This is real. This is a fight to the death...life comes at you hard...

Losing is not an option if we don't want 1984 for the next few decades..

Well said :)

Good post! and a very important subject.

Take the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act then add the 1996 Telecommunications Act and you have what you mentioned here plus media cartels. Some quote from its Wikipedia (bolds are mine...):

The Act was claimed to foster competition. Instead, it continued the historic industry consolidation reducing the number of major media companies from around 50 in 1983 to 10 in 1996[23] and 6 in 2005.[24] An FCC study found that the Act had led to a drastic decline in the number of radio station owners, even as the actual number of commercial stations in the United States had increased.[25] This decline in owners and increase in stations has reportedly had the effect of radio homogenization, where programming has become similar across formats.
Consumer activist Ralph Nader argued that the Act was an example of corporate welfare spawned by political corruption, because it gave away to incumbent broadcasters valuable licenses for broadcasting digital signals on the public airwaves.[26] There was a requirement in the Act that the FCC not auction off the public spectrum which the FCC itself valued at $11–$70 billion.
It had been specifically named in the Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace as an act "which repudiates your own [i.e. American] Constitution and insults the dreams of Jefferson, Washington, Mill, Madison, DeToqueville, and Brandeis".[27]

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Thank you!
Our brains are washed thoroughly :)