RE: Last part of "Can so-called whistleblower Ronald Bernard be trusted?"

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Last part of "Can so-called whistleblower Ronald Bernard be trusted?"

in conspiracy •  7 years ago 

I might be repeating myself here (from my other comments to your other articles) but either you didn't pay much attention to the interviews OR you are speculating/hoping that the readers of this article didn't watch them or didn't pay much attention.

"And he does not give any evidence, he does not want to do something about it, [...]

What kind of evidence would/should that be in your opinion? You realize all of this happened more than 20 years ago, do you? In additioin it‘s very likely the people he has worked for are careful enough not to provide anyone with anything that could implicate them. You can't be so naive that you would actually think they wouldn't be extremely careful...?

"In this whole video he talks about the fact that he won’t do anything about his first life."

Except for the roughly 25 minutes where he doesn't.

"He is just founding a bank."

And nowhere in that video did he say that. If you were just going by the three interviews that have been published so far Without googling him afterwards you wouldn't have the slightest idea he is founding a bank.

"You have to rely on their good-doing because you trust Ronald Bernard. He is the only one we know about and he is the anchor. You have nothing specific to invest in at this time except for Bernard’s reliability as a person."

And everyone who doesn't feel like doing that doesn't need to. No-one is obligated to believe him, let alone support his bank project. The mature approach to this would be something like – this isn‘t for me, I don‘t believe him, I carry on with my life, case closed. So why are you (and some others) trying to rabidly not only shoot him down as a person but also his bank project? I really don't get this. We are all adults, we can all make our own decisions. But someone like you coming round the corner and going like: Hey, I once trusted him but now I don't anymore and SO SHOULDN'T YOU. Hello? Patronizing much? Seriously, where does all this hate come from?

"A few safe locations where the EU and the banking-union has no grip on, are: the City of London(10), Jersey(11), Guernsey(12) and Isle of Man(13). Unlike the big money, held by royalty and large enterprises, we have a different approach in our undertaking."

I really recommend watching this lecture for a bigger picture and context for this:

"And what does my money really do in those deposits?"

What would you care? You likely aren't going to invest anything.

"He tells you over and over again that he is just founding a bank."

No, he doesn't.

"A criminal who is not willing to face jail time and invest all of his power in changing the system that made him this criminal is no hero at all. "

So, what is it? You want him in jail OR you want him to do something? Both at the same time is not possible.

"You say you can’t say anything because you have to protect yourself and others. Noone should accept this apology. You are telling us that you protect yourself and other criminals from charges?"

How much mental gymnastics was involved to deliberately misinterpret his statement that he has to protect others to "other criminals" rather than friends and family?

"I don’t want you to build this cryptic bank and I don’t want you to collect people like sheep."

So, everyone who supports him or the B of Joy is a sheep? Wow, that's some next level audacity. But I bet you don't have the slightest problem with people eating your articles up and agreeing with everything you say, and because of that become suspicious and stop trusting him and blah - these people would be sheep as well - going by your definition.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!