Is the Truther Movement Performing a False Flag on Itself?

in conspiracy •  7 years ago  (edited)

This is in response to a video by jaysather that was posted today on YouTube. It might be on here, but I am not sure.

I enjoy your posts, but not everyone is under the influence of the cabal. Some people just make bad decisions all by themselves. You literally sound like some of these so called "Crisis actors". You have already formulated an opinion when; we literally just learned about this kid. If we are so apt to criticize people who come out with all the answers right after an event (9-11) and call them "Crisis actors" then I have to ask myself why is it that we are so quick to come to these same conclusions ourselves?

1339505.jpg

If we are to stay out of the realm of "Flat Earthers" then we need to slow down and make a more accurate assessment. Richard Dolan says that one of the signs of a "False Flag" is that "Experts" and "Witnesses" are quick to offer answers and plant seeds about what happened and they use a lot of key trigger words.

Hogg.jpg

If you pay attention to our community we tend to do the same things. We make major jumps in logic to formulate conclusions. Why are we so quick to assume that this kid is under the influence of "Voice of God" tech and Why were we so quick to assume that David Hogg was a "Crisis Actor" and the Cruz kid was also under the influence of the Cabal. I personally think he was treated like shit because he was weird, which led to emotional problems that led to pharmaceuticals that led to the killings.

merlin_135146529_1f90100a-9bc6-4735-adcc-78a8e79bad71-master768.jpg

It seems like this "Truther" community is under the same pressure as the media with 24 hour news cycles. It brings the attitude of having to get it out first, which usually will result in some part of the story being false. In a sense we are perpetrating a "False Flag" on our own movement. We must ask ourselves, do we want the truth or are we being entertained by our own wild notions?

Personally when I read comments people make, I believe it is the latter for most people. I for one take this matter seriously and if you take the time to dig into this subject you will learn that these things actually happen. Yes we draw conclusions about some events, but it took time and evidence so we could make an educated guess about them before it is actually proven. We may be right in our assumptions, but they are just that and if we want to take our movement mainstream then perhaps we need to proceed with caution.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

no, we've seen it all before a hundred times, same m.o. - same blanket msm coverage, same crappy crisis actors, same calls for more security, gun control, technologisation, or hatred and fear of one country or group or other.

when you've been doing it a while you'll spot it quickly too, and it can come over blase to those who don't see the glaring fake deceptions, such as the recent russian-skripal so-called poisoning case in britain.

even when actual hard first-hand expert witness evidence is produced of the big fake story's lies, the truth rarely gets out, because mass media is tightly controlled.

the only real stories are those they try to suppress, ignore and skew as 'theories' or not half as bad as they sound.

DYovY3oX4AA0FLk.jpg

So what is your take on this bomber in Austin? Apparently he recorded a 25 minute confession that so far has not been released to the public. Yet the truthers are saying he was mind controlled. In my mind it is a major leap to draw that conclusion.

yes, another fake phony hoax show, but not so they can ban bombs (unfortunately.)
if you don't believe in mind control you need to look up the mk and mj programs. also remember bradley manning? he's the guy that leaked american war crimes to wikileaks, they charged him and sent him to prison and he came out as chelsea manning not long after. they have patsies, millions of them, ready to go.
it is a good thing that people aren't actually seriously hurt or killed in these things though isn't it?

I am fully aware of the mind control projects and I am aware these things have been used. My issue is that we jump to this conclusion immediately. We bypass A, B and C and go directly to Z. I am sorry but that can't always be right. Don't you think it is prudent to get a littel more facts about the case before we make these assumptions?

i agree to a certain extent, if that's your thing. but once one has done several investigations into these events you being to see the same patterns, which is why people seem to jump to conclusions i think.

and then you realise paying attention to the msm narrative does little to help your family or others anyway. it's better that you control your narrative, so point people's attention to the things you have researched, whether that's vaccinations, self-sufficiency, deep state, cashless society, etc. etc.

there's always more to research, even 'regular' topics like science, food growing, energy generation, God etc.
peace.