MARSH V ALABAMA; SOCIAL MEDIA CENSORSHIP UNCONSTITUTIONAL

in constitution •  6 years ago 

Privately owned corporations, open to the public, cannot discriminate by denying constitutionally protected speech.

“Ownership does not always mean absolute dominion.”

The more an owner, for his advantage, opens up his property for use by the public in general, the more do his rights become circumscribed by the statutory and constitutional rights of those who use it.

In order to enable the public to be properly
informed, their information must be uncensored.

marsh v alabama cover.jpg

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!