"Free your mind and the rest will follow..." - inspired by many exchanges on steemit

in criticalthinking •  8 years ago  (edited)

Today I found myself having yet another discussion about perhaps the most important tool you can ever learn about next to WORDS themselves. That tool is critical thinking.

I bring up critical thinking quite a lot in various replies, and in my posts. There is a reason I do this. I personally consider it one of the most valuable TOOLS I have ever learned. Yet, I almost didn't learn it. I also want to qualify that I am STILL learning it and getting better through practice, and observation.

When I think of big world problems whether they are government, philosophy, climate, etc. I largely see vast amounts of these exchanges where those trying to solve the problem clearly were not exposed to perhaps the most important tool for this mission. What I am referring to is Critical Thinking. When I speak of critical thinking I am referring to more than True, False, And, Or, Not, as those while being a part, are actually the easy part. For many people that may be the only part they are exposed to. I am more often referring to logical fallacies. I use them, you use them, and I see the world using them in mass quantities. Until you know how to identify them it is usually something you don't know that you are doing. Furthermore, when someone challenges you on them you don't know what they are talking about, and you suspect they are simply being stubborn and trolling you. This generally is not the case. This is something they do not teach in schooling. I went through many years of college and I was exposed to it in TWO classes that I easily could have avoided. I mostly was first exposed to it purely by chance.

I see people often calling another person a Troll when I am simply a spectator reading their exchange. What I see is clearly different than either of them. I see two people trying to have an exchange on opposing ideas and neither of them have ever been given the tools necessary to help guide them through such a conflict. They may think they have those tools, but odds are from what I have seen of the education system they do not. They could have those tools though. Yet it does require a few things first.

  • An understanding that we are never truly done learning.
  • Willingness to be wrong, and realize that being wrong is not bad, it is simply an important part of learning.
  • Understanding it is not always about right and wrong. Often both sides may be right about some things and wrong about others. Sometimes they may both be wrong. Sometimes they both may be right. Without understanding the perspective of each person it can be difficult to determine this. This is especially true if you have not been taught the tools to help with this.

There are a lot of different logical fallacies. I am constantly practicing and trying to improve my own understanding and facility with them. I consider the only tool we learn in education that is more important than critical thinking as being WORDS themselves. Without them critical thinking would not work either. I would not call it more important than mathematics, but I would consider it equal in importance to mathematics.

Yet it is easy to go through education without being taught any of it. If you are like me your first exposure to it might be purely accidental and by chance.

I've written articles about parts of this before. I will continue to do so in the future. I believe it is perhaps one of the most important things to speak about. I profess that I am essentially an Anarcho-capitalist, but I've come to believe that until the vast majority of the population truly understands critical thinking, that my current ideal view of future self-governance and voluntarism will not work. If critical thinking is the norm then I do believe it is achievable, and the population would be equipped to attempt to answer questions that come up at that time that we likely do not know now.

It is more than likely any of you that made it this far already know what I am talking about. In fact, my true audience that I am interested in this particular article most likely did not make it this far. I hope one or more people do.

For who is that audience? People that have heard this before and would like to learn more about critical thinking. There are a lot of places to do this. I will provide a few. I'll also link to a few of my older articles that were a similar topic. You will not become an "expert" (I'm not a fan of that word) you will simply be starting a journey of learning about a new tool. It is a tool we don't master, yet we get better at using and appreciating with practice.

The Critical Thinking Community
Critical Thinking Skills - from SkillsYouNeed.com
Critical Thinking Flashcards - Quizlet
Critical Thinking - flashcardmachine.com
Logical Fallacies Flashcards - Quizlet





As I stated, I am no expert or master. I am constantly practicing and pushing myself on these things as well. For even though I have read everything above about these things that does not mean I have internalized it and use it instinctively. That is where the practice comes in. I can read an engineering book, that doesn't suddenly make me a master engineer. It simply gets me started along a path. This to me is a thing of wonder. A Philosopher was someone who loved learning, loved knowledge.

Never stop learning...


Steem On!




Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

A basic but easy book to start for some might be 'the art of thinking clearly' by Rolf Dobelli. It covers a lot of thinking fallacies with clear examples that may be easier for some to hold in mind. It may not win an argument but may help identify the flaws in one. Good post mate.

Yep. Winning an argument shouldn't always be the goal. Sometimes we are wrong, so we need to lose. Having the tools to make that process work is ideal. In addition, if we were wrong and through this process we realize that then I don't really consider that losing. :)

I see argument as development rather than win or lose. If someone argues well (Brings sound logic and data to the table) and can shift my understanding it is to my benefit. How others experience the discourse is up to them but I will selfishly chase better information, even if it disrupts or destroys my current position. Why live believing in something if you aren't willing to journey to see if it is fact? Most defend their positions more out of fear of it being wrong than out of certainty it is right. If one is absolutely certain of truth (not believing they are certain), there is no argument. And if one knows an absolute truth, the demonstration and proof of it will be enough to convince the majority to turn. Those that have veriable proof and choose not to accept would then have to admit they are choosing a fallacy. Once seen, ignorance can't be claimed. It would be a terribly conflicted existence believing in something you know to be false.

I will give you a follow and see where this rabbit hole leads.

As far as the follow thanks. I write about a lot of different things. Whatever interests me at the moment. So I am likely to write about things you are not interested in from time to time. Though Music (tending toward metal or progressive though sometimes not even close to those), Philosophy, Game Development, History, and Steemit/Reactionary stuff tend to be my most common areas. I returned the follow so I might notice some of the stuff you write.

I may skip the metal :)

As you should, if that is not your thing. :)

I tend to view it the same as you. I don't argue in a negative sense of the word. I prefer to learn as well as teach. In a good argument I don't believe there are actual losers. Everyone should benefit in some way.

I do know there are exceptions, but I don't seek them out. An argument with only one winner, is actually kind of a sad thing. :)

The power-hungry and insecure want to dominate, the intelligent want to discover and grow. Something about being the smartest and wrong room might fit here.

IT could. That likely is true, I have no interest in domination. I have plenty of my own issues to try to keep managed without adding controlling others to the mix.

Oh and for the record. I make logical fallacy statements too. Though I realize this and am fine when someone calls me out on it. Hopefully they do so with civility rather than calling me an idiot. I hope that I am getting better at it, but I still do it as well.

life is full of hard and weird things, anyway have to find a way to survive! and last!

Survival usually requires tools. :) Critical Thinking can be one of the most powerful tools. IT seems to improve with usage rather than become dulled.

I see people often calling another person a Troll when I am simply a spectator reading their exchange.

Yes, this happens a lot. Apparently, there is no such thing as legitimately having a different opinion.

They may think they have those tools, but odds are from what I have seen of the education system they do not.

It really is a sad thing to see, especially when these people are given a lot of power and influence over others. One of the biggest problems we face is a complete lack of critical thought, whether it's in government/politics, a classroom, or even social media. I suppose that most people are used to hearing the phrase, "Your opinion matters." But then they take that to mean that their opinion is equally valid or that it is actually correct on a given issue.

You can have an opinion or a stance on a given topic or issue, but you can also be quite incorrect based on actual facts. Whatever the circumstance, someone disagreeing with you does not automagically make them a "troll." And this type of retort happens a lot on this platform, on a variety of topics.

And this type of retort happens a lot on this platform, on a variety of topics.

I think it happens on all platforms today.

Oh, I agree there. I was just noting that this one is no different. In fact, the "troll" accusation may even occur more often here.

I think reddit likely beats here. :)

Here there may be a couple of exchanges and then they call you troll because you still disagree.

Reddit they may skip the exchanges completely and just say you are a troll. :)

That steemit was patterned a lot after reddit, I am not surprised to see it.

In reality... I can't blame them for going there if they haven't learned how to deal with conflict/debate/argument (good kind) and if they still adamantly believe they are "right" and the rest of the world is "wrong" (unless they agree with them).

So it is a hard thing to make people realize. If I can help convince even one person, or plant the seeds that some day help them realize these things then that makes the effort worth it.

I am not attempting to make them agree with me on a single thing. All I want them to do is to start the journey of understanding, recognizing, and reducing their own usage of logical fallacies. I hope they learn some of the other critical thinking skills that are designed to help people resolve disagreements.

These are all things I am trying to improve as well. I make mistakes too.

"and I see the world using them in mass quantities." Ugh, so true. This one is fun and funny: http://dontfallacy.me/

Thank you for sharing. There are so many of them, I can't remember them all. Though that one is a good one I have been to before but forgot to bookmark and couldn't remember where it was.

In a way, using words is mathematics in the same way that poetry is mathematics. I believe Einstein said something to that effect. As numerical sequences are the basis of mathematics, word sequences are the basis for ideas. Critical thinking is freedom of the mind. The ability to recognize patterns that are not preordained by others. Or, in the immortal words of Junior in the movie Platoon..."Free your mind, your ass will follow."

Haha! I just read your title...I was perusing authors...The joke's on me lol!!!

Great Post :)

Thanks