Death, Taxes, and Central Authority

in crypto •  7 years ago  (edited)

Nearly every day brings news of governmental and big bank opinion on Bitcoin, Ether, Blockchain, and Crypto in general. Much of the business and popular press hang on these outsider pronouncements like jury verdicts. We find it useful to ignore these discussions. The value of monitoring is solely to gauge outsider opinion. We suppose it has been this way with upstarts, outsiders and disruptors. Maybe it has to be this way?

There is more than a touch of irony in the fact that the general public relies on the pronouncements of journalists who interview outsiders and the uninitiated. The heavy flow of new investors, inventors, and initiates filing into the movement are being inspired by glimpses of potential offered by outsiders who are at risk from the new technology. These voices are then filtered by skeptical, and often marginally informed, journalists. The ill- informed and mildly opposed pontificate; and still they come.

When the history of the early days of crypto is written, it will rely heavily on press reports. These reports will, in turn, lean on asking outsiders who have proved very successful in the imperiled, previous epoch.
How many of these folks do you think will stay on top given the tumultuous change that motivate insiders and attract investors? I guess that is what motivates us on the inside of this movement?

iCash hopes to be a part of convincing- even “experts” and reporters- that there is utility in utility tokens.

Visit us at http://icash.network for the latest news and early access to our upcoming Token Generation Event!

ICASH_LOCKUP_RIGHT_BLUE_GREEN.jpg

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!