The race for the first bitcoin ETF has hit a regulatory speed bump.
In the past 24 hours, four prospective issuers withdrew requests at the US Securities and Exchange Commission for approval to list exchange-traded funds based on the largest cryptocurrency. Direxion Shares ETF Trust said the regulator “expressed concerns regarding the liquidity and valuation of the underlying instruments” its proposed fund would invest in.
The withdrawals are the latest setback for the financial industry’s push to bring bitcoin into the investing mainstream a month after the first futures contracts began trading. Proponents speculated the derivatives would tamp down wild swings in bitcoin spot prices and open up the market to other products such as ETFs.
But the SEC has not deviated from its skeptical view of the assets. Just Friday, the regulator issued a bipartisan endorsement of a warning on digital coins, saying investors should “exercise caution” as many participants in “cryptocurrency-related investment markets are not following” securities laws. In March, the watchdog rejected the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust ETF proposal.
Bitcoin fell 1.2% to $14,762 as of 4:18 p.m. in New York. The coin rose 1,400 percent last year, but ended 23 percent below its all-time high of $19,511, set the day CME Group Inc. launched its version of bitcoin futures.
More than 15 bitcoin-related ETFs have been proposed since 2013. On Monday, Exchange Listed Funds Trust said it withdrew its application for several ETFs based on the cryptocurrency at the request of the SEC. ProShares Trust on Tuesday pulled its request to list four bitcoin ETFs “in response to a request” by the SEC. VanEck Vectors ETF Trust also dropped its request Tuesday.
Cboe Global Markets Inc., the exchange operator that listed the first bitcoin futures, filed in mid-December for a proposed rule change to list and trade shares of the GraniteShares Bitcoin ETF and GraniteShares Short Bitcoin ETF. The application is pending.
Not indicating that the content you copy/paste is not your original work could be seen as plagiarism.
These are some tips on how to share content and add value:
Repeated plagiarized posts are considered spam. Spam is discouraged by the community, and may result in action from the cheetah bot.
Creative Commons: If you are posting content under a Creative Commons license, please attribute and link according to the specific license. If you are posting content under CC0 or Public Domain please consider noting that at the end of your post.
If you are actually the original author, please do reply to let us know!
Thank You!
More Info: Abuse Guide - 2017.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
https://businesstech.co.za/news/banking/218637/bitcoin-etfs-hit-regulatory-roadblock/
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit