Moloch, Saturn (Satan) and Lucifer working together for Global dominance or Omnicide

Kazakhstan - ENERGY RESEARCH, CERN. Where the Saudi Arabians, Chinese, Japanese, Deep State $$$ and dirty deals (pay-to-play) happen - https://www.rferl.org/z/648/pc2.html?p=304 Moloch, Satrun and Lucifer working together. They don't give a s#it about the oil, they wanted the people and buildings cleared for the NEOM project and the stealthgrid (satellite control of the airwaves aka www, intranet and outernet). https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-china-is-weaponizing-outer-space/ https://www.telesurtv.net/english/opinion/China-and-Russia-Digging-the-US-Dollars-Grave-20171107-0015.html https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/how-china-is-weaponizing-outer-space/ Bitcoin core, the main developer team of bitcoin, was taken over by deep state, this is documented in detail on the subredit r/btc which is the main resistance against r/bitcoin 's censorship and outright disinformation backed by the reddit admins and sharia blue. Read all about it here: https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6rzwhy/people_should_get_the_full_story_of_rbitcoin/?st=jc99rfnk&sh=644fed1b and here https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6rxw7k/informative_btc_vs_bch_articles/dl8v4lp/?st=jc99rqck&sh=77571738

There's a war between /r/bitcoin and /r/bch and a lot of users from r Bitcoin got their reddit accounts broken into and they blamed it on r bch. However r bch discovered that it was the moderators of r bitcoin themselves that hacked their own user base so they can blame the other side. An angry person writes about his experience with what I think is one of Project Mayhem's programs for creating Disorganized Schizophrenia in the online community: [all these citizen journalists covering q WILL NOT SHUT UP about crypto and how wonderful it is for everyone even if you can't afford to buy more than $10 a week. I am frankly sick of hearing about it. It can only be bought using 1 single solitary app called coinbase that is so incredibly sheety that I was not able to complete their inane identity verification process after trying over and over again for the better part of a month. Eventually the incessant bother sent me into a rage and I deactivated my account which CANNOT be undone. And, I don't care. I don't really want to use Rothschilds demon eye fiat bills but, hey, at least I can actually get my hands on those. I will NEVER go to the extent of the maddening trouble I did with coinbase for ANY reason EVER again in my life.] The the shilbots come in and 'inform', 'encourage' and 'support' the game: [coinbase is the very worst, try kraken or virwox or gemini or binance or literally anything but coinbase]. Another experiencer in summation of his/her attempt to join the crytocraze: [I missed the boat on Crypto, invested way too late and just want my money back. I'm hoping it rebounds but I feel like it has jumped the shark. Also, all these new coins keep coming out that seem like classic Ponzi schemes. I don't know enough about blockchain to even understand half the fight, but just know enough to feel burnt.] And, more from the Shilbot: [buy the cheap coins, they are 1000 units a $1, just get those and in a couple of years you'll have millions, maybe months] Our alternative media presenters failing to gain adequate support from their paypal and patreon subscribers and having their youtube videos and radio programs demonitized are the major new source for the crypto and blockchain ads. I am NOT a crypto-literate. My experience with crypto and bitcoin, steemit, Earth Dollars and so on is my guide to research the bigger picture. When people win the lottery there is a push to get interviews and find out about these 'lucky winners'. The MSM articles on the wealth attained through crypto has a lot of strangeness and little stuffing. Mostly sponsored. When all of us are putting our hearts and minds into creating the media and presenting the ideas from which we receive these little tokens and rewards - which is not why most people use the platforms anyway - who is lurking and taking our information. Aaron Swartz died as a result of unveiling the secrets of the hidden knowledge. How the Universities 'own' the ideas, research, patents and decide who gets the $$$ and credit. I have met one such scam artist - Earth Bank, Earth Alliance, Earth Dollars. And, behind the scenes it is Chinese - Hakka money. Stealthgrid quantum computing and failure after failure when it comes to the programs for humanity, earth and animals. Hundreds of thousands of dollars poured in for Standing Rock Sioux tribe buffalo. Then the EPA quarantined the buffalo. Millions of dollars poured in for the NODAPL and where did the money go? Into the pocket of the corrupt. A civil war was happening in America and no one was informed. Another way to steal our ideas, hopes and money. IMO https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-04/anatomy-crypto-nightmare-ripple-ceo-now-richer-zuckerberg
Anatomy Of A Crypto-Nightmare: Ripple CEO Is Now Richer Than Zuckerberg
Profile picture for user Tyler Durden
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 01/05/2018 - 03:21
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-10/did-china-just-burst-everything-bubble ![GPC11018.jpg] ()

This advertisement wants you to assume that a market exists for treasury bonds and wants you to believe that this "market" (ie., with price discovery, objective buyers and sellers, no govt. interference or racketeering) will blow up because someone might stop buying something.

But there is no market here and the advertiser's logic is wrong.

When the Chinese or anyone else stops buying, the bankers who contrive this "market" merely print more money to pay off the existing coupons as they mature and convert more of America into their own pockets via their legal entities. This only takes a few key strokes and fixes the problem by kicking the can one more time down the road. The more important issue is that people believe this nonsense while ownership of their world slowly is legally transferred from the many to the few. We are witnessing the creation of an American neofeudal society. See Charles Hugh Smith of www.oftwominds.com ]
Brad Garlinghouse

Brad is the CEO of Ripple and a member of the Board of Directors. Prior to Ripple, Brad served as the CEO of file collaboration service Hightail. Previously, he was President of Consumer Applications at AOL from 2009 to 2012 and held various positions at Yahoo! from 2003 to 2009, including Senior Vice President. Brad formerly served as CEO of Dialpad Communications, held management positions at SBC Communications and @Home Network and was an advisor to Silverlake Partners. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of Animoto and OutMatch and has held board positions at Ancestry.com and Tonic Health.
http://keclips.com/ke-play/Keclips-ripple-ceo-explains-the-power-behind-ripple-xrp-brad-garlinghouse-interview-KevnGNycbhJlE.html What really happens with Bitcoin: https://blog.gdax.com/bitcoin-cash-launch-retrospective-79c2eb7d9175 ...[6:30 pm PST: We announced that the BCH-USD, BCH-EUR, and BCH-BTC books would move to ‘cancel-only’ mode and all open orders would be cleared. The BCH-EUR and BCH-BTC books never achieved our liquidity minimums needed to enable trading so no trades ever occurred.

December 20, 2017

8:56 am PST: We announced our intention to open the BCH-USD, BCH-EUR, and BCH-BTC books in ‘post-only’ mode. We also adjusted the liquidity minimums needed to enable trading based on the previous day’s market behavior.

11:00 am PST: We enabled trading on the BCH-USD book. This market has been operating in an orderly manner since this time.

7:41 pm PST: The BCH-EUR and BCH-BTC books failed to achieve our liquidity minimums needed to enable trading. Both books were moved to ‘cancel-only’ mode and open orders cleared.

December 21, 2017

7:01 am PST: We opened the BCH-EUR and BCH-BTC books in ‘post-only’ mode.

3:37 pm PST: The BCH-EUR and BCH-BTC books failed to achieve our liquidity minimums needed to enable trading. Both books were moved to ‘cancel-only’ mode and open orders cleared. We announced our intention to disable the BCH-EUR and BCH-BTC books until after the holidays when there would be a higher likelihood of meeting liquidity standards needed to enable trading.

Announcement Strategy

We are committed to building the world’s most trusted digital asset exchange and we approach the process of supporting a new asset seriously. This is especially true when deciding to support an asset that is created from the fork of an asset already supported on GDAX. For example, we believe it’s important to minimize potentially disruptive events while customers do not have access to the forked asset. This belief drove our decision to announce our support for BCH trading only once all customers had access to their BCH.] People should get the full story of r/bitcoin because it is probably one of the strangest of all reddit subs (reddit.com)

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6rzwhy/people_should_get_the_full_story_of_rbitcoin/?st=jc9sd2w2&sh=28c01e7c Drama, Delusional or Disorganized Schizophrenia, Mayhem and advertising which will is used to support the new alternative media aka truthseekers, conspiracy theorists and nutters: [People should get the full story of r/bitcoin because it is probably one of the strangest of all reddit subs.

r/bitcoin, the main sub for the bitcoin community is held and run by a person who goes by the pseudonym u/theymos. Theymos not only controls r/bitcoin, but also bitcoin.org and bitcointalk.com. These are top three communication channels for the bitcoin community, all controlled by just one person.

For most of bitcoin's history this did not create a problem (at least not an obvious one anyway) until around mid 2015. This happened to be around the time a new player appeared on the scene, a for-profit company called Blockstream. Blockstream was made up of/hired many (but not all) of the main bitcoin developers. (To be clear, Blockstream was founded before mid 2015 but did not become publicly active until then). A lot of people, including myself, tried to point out there we're some very serious potential conflicts of interest that could arise when one single company controls most of the main developers for the biggest decentralised and distributed cryptocurrency. There were a lot of unknowns but people seemed to give them the benefit of the doubt because they were apparently about to release some new software called "sidechains" that could offer some benefits to the network.

Not long after Blockstream came on the scene the issue of bitcoin's scalability once again came to forefront of the community. This issue came within the community a number of times since bitcoins inception. Bitcoin, as dictated in the code, cannot handle any more than around 3 transactions per second at the moment. To put that in perspective Paypal handles around 15 transactions per second on average and VISA handles something like 2000 transactions per second. The discussion in the community has been around how best to allow bitcoin to scale to allow a higher number of transactions in a given amount of time. I suggest that if anyone is interested in learning more about this problem from a technical angle, they go to r/btc and do a search. It's a complex issue but for many who have followed bitcoin for many years, the possible solutions seem relatively obvious. Essentially, currently the limit is put in place in just a few lines of code. This was not originally present when bitcoin was first released. It was in fact put in place afterwards as a measure to stop a bloating attack on the network. Because all bitcoin transactions have to be stored forever on the bitcoin network, someone could theoretically simply transmit a large number of transactions which would have to be stored by the entire network forever. When bitcoin was released, transactions were actually for free as the only people running the network were enthusiasts. In fact a single bitcoin did not even have any specific value so it would be impossible set a fee value. This meant that a malicious person could make the size of the bitcoin ledger grow very rapidly without much/any cost which would stop people from wanting to join the network due to the resource requirements needed to store it, which at the time would have been for very little gain.

Towards the end of the summer last year, this bitcoin scaling debate surfaced again as it was becoming clear that the transaction limit for bitcoin was semi regularly being reached and that it would not be long until it would be regularly hit and the network would become congested. This was a very serious issue for a currency. Bitcoin had made progress over the years to the point of retailers starting to offer it as a payment option. Bitcoin companies like, Microsoft, Paypal, Steam and many more had began to adopt it. If the transaction limit would be constantly maxed out, the network would become unreliable and slow for users. Users and businesses would not be able to make a reliable estimate when their transaction would be confirmed by the network.

Users, developers and businesses (which at the time was pretty much the only real bitcoin subreddit) started to discuss how we should solve the problem r/bitcoin. There was significant support from the users and businesses behind a simple solution put forward by the developer Gavin Andreesen. Gavin was the lead developer after Satoshi Nakamoto left bitcoin and he left it in his hands. Gavin initially proposed a very simple solution of increasing the limit which was to change the few lines of code to increase the maximum number of transactions that are allowed. For most of bitcoin's history the transaction limit had been set far far higher than the number of transactions that could potentially happen on the network. The concept of increasing the limit one time was based on the fact that history had proven that no issue had been cause by this in the past.

A certain group of bitcoin developers decided that increasing the limit by this amount was too much and that it was dangerous. They said that the increased use of resources that the network would use would create centralisation pressures which could destroy the network. The theory was that a miner of the network with more resources could publish many more transactions than a competing small miner could handle and therefore the network would tend towards few large miners rather than many small miners. The group of developers who supported this theory were all developers who worked for the company Blockstream. The argument from people in support of increasing the transaction capacity by this amount was that there are always inherent centralisation pressure with bitcoin mining. For example miners who can access the cheapest electricity will tend to succeed and that bigger miners will be able to find this cheaper electricity easier. Miners who have access to the most efficient computer chips will tend to succeed and that larger miners are more likely to be able to afford the development of them. The argument from Gavin and other who supported increasing the transaction capacity by this method are essentially there are economies of scale in mining and that these economies have far bigger centralisation pressures than increased resource cost for a larger number of transactions (up to the new limit proposed). For example, at the time the total size of the blockchain was around 50GB. Even for the cost of a 500GB SSD is only $150 and would last a number of years. This is in-comparison to the $100,000's in revenue per day a miner would be making.

Various developers put forth various other proposals, including Gavin Andresen who put forth a more conservative increase that would then continue to increase over time inline with technological improvements. Some of the employees of blockstream also put forth some proposals, but all were so conservative, it would take bitcoin many decades before it could reach a scale of VISA. Even though there was significant support from the community behind Gavin's simple proposal of increasing the limit it was becoming clear certain members of the bitcoin community who were part of Blockstream were starting to become increasingly vitriolic and divisive. Gavin then teamed up with one of the other main bitcoin developers Mike Hearn and released a coded (i.e. working) version of the bitcoin software that would only activate if it was supported by a significant majority of the network. What happened next was where things really started to get weird.

After this free and open source software was released, Theymos, the person who controls all the main communication channels for the bitcoin community implemented a new moderation policy that disallowed any discussion of this new software. Specifically, if people were to discuss this software, their comments would be deleted and ultimately they would be banned temporarily or permanently. This caused chaos within the community as there was very clear support for this software at the time and it seemed our best hope for finally solving the problem and moving on. Instead a censorship campaign was started. At first it 'all' they were doing was banning and removing discussions but after a while it turned into actively manipulating the discussion. For example, if a thread was created where there was positive sentiment for increasing the transaction capacity or being negative about the moderation policies or negative about the actions of certain bitcoin developers, the mods of r/bitcoin would selectively change the sorting order of threads to 'controversial' so that the most support opinions would be sorted to the bottom of the thread and the most vitriolic would be sorted to the top of the thread. This was initially very transparent as it was possible to see that the most downvoted comments were at the top and some of the most upvoted were at the bottom. So they then implemented hiding the voting scores next to the users name. This made impossible to work out the sentiment of the community and when combined with selectively setting the sorting order to controversial it was possible control what information users were seeing. Also, due to the very very large number of removed comments and users it was becoming obvious the scale of censorship going on. To hide this they implemented code in their CSS for the sub that completely hid comments that they had removed so that the censorship itself was hidden. Anyone in support of scaling bitcoin were removed from the main communication channels. Theymos even proudly announced that he didn't care if he had to remove 90% of the users. He also later acknowledged that he knew he had the ability to block support of this software using the control he had over the communication channels.

Continued in next comment.....

While this was all going on, Blockstream and it's employees started lobbying the community by paying for conferences about scaling bitcoin, but with the very very strange rule that no decisions could be made and no complete solutions could be proposed. These conferences were likely strategically (and successfully) created to stunt support for the scaling software Gavin and Mike had released by forcing the community to take a "lets wait and see what comes from the conferences" kind of approach. Since no final solutions were allowed at these conferences, they only served to hinder and splinter the communities efforts to find a solution. As the software Gavin and Mike released called BitcoinXT gained support it started to be attacked. Users of the software were attack by DDOS. Employees of Blockstream were recommending attacks against the software, such as faking support for it, to only then drop support at the last moment to put the network in disarray. Blockstream employees were also publicly talking about suing Gavin and Mike from various different angles simply for releasing this open source software that no one was forced to run. In the end Mike Hearn decided to leave due to the way many members of the bitcoin community had treated him. This was due to the massive disinformation campaign against him on r/bitcoin. One of the many tactics that are used against anyone who does not support Blockstream and the bitcoin developers who work for them is that you will be targeted in a smear campaign. This has happened to a number of individuals and companies who showed support for scaling bitcoin. Theymos has threatened companies that he will ban any discussion of them on the communication channels he controls (i.e. all the main ones) for simply running software that he disagrees with (i.e. any software that scales bitcoin).

As time passed, more and more proposals were offered, all against the backdrop of ever increasing censorship in the main bitcoin communication channels. It finally come down the smallest and most conservative solution. This solution was much smaller than even the employees of Blockstream had proposed months earlier. As usual there was enormous attacks from all sides and the most vocal opponents were the employees of Blockstream. These attacks still are ongoing today. As this software started to gain support, Blockstream organised more meetings, especially with the biggest bitcoin miners and made a pact with them. They promised that they would release code that would offer an on-chain scaling solution hardfork within about 4 months, but if the miners wanted this they would have to commit to running their software and only their software. The miners agreed and the ended up not running the most conservative proposal possible. This was in February last year. There is no hardfork proposal in sight from the people who agreed to this pact and bitcoin is still stuck with the exact same transaction limit it has had since the limit was put in place about 6 years ago. Gavin has also been publicly smeared by the developers at Blockstream and a plot was made against him to have him removed from the development team. Gavin has now been, for all intents an purposes, expelled from bitcoin development. This has meant that all control of bitcoin development is in the hands of the developers working at Blockstream.

There is a new proposal that offers a market based approach to scaling bitcoin. This essentially lets the market decide. Of course, as usual there has been attacks against it, and verbal attacks from the employees of Blockstream. This has the biggest chance of gaining wide support and solving the problem for good.

To give you an idea of Blockstream; It has hired most of the main and active bitcoin developers and is now synonymous with the "Core" bitcoin development team. They AFAIK no products at all. They have received around $75m in funding. Every single thing they do is supported by /u/theymos. They have started implementing an entirely new economic system for bitcoin against the will of it's users and have blocked any and all attempts to scaling the network in line with the original vision.

Although this comment is ridiculously long, it really only covers the tip of the iceberg. You could write a book on the last two years of bitcoin. The things that have been going on have been mind blowing. One last thing that I think is worth talking about is the u/bashco's claim of vote manipulation.

The users that the video talks about have very very large numbers of downvotes mostly due to them having a very very high chance of being astroturfers. Around about the same time last year when Blockstream came active on the scene every single bitcoin troll disappeared, and I mean literally every single one. In the years before that there were a large number of active anti-bitcoin trolls. They even have an active sub r/buttcoin. Up until last year you could go down to the bottom of pretty much any thread in r/bitcoin and see many of the usual trolls who were heavily downvoted for saying something along the lines of "bitcoin is shit", "You guys and your tulips" etc. But suddenly last year they all disappeared. Instead a new type of bitcoin user appeared. Someone who said they were fully in support of bitcoin but they just so happened to support every single thing Blockstream and its employees said and did. They had the exact same tone as the trolls who had disappeared. Their way to talking to people was aggressive, they'd call people names, they had a relatively poor understanding of how bitcoin fundamentally worked. They were extremely argumentative. These users are the majority of the list of that video. When the 10's of thousands of users were censored and expelled from r/bitcoin they ended up congregating in r/btc. The strange thing was that the users listed in that video also moved over to r/btc and spend all day everyday posting troll-like comments and misinformation. Naturally they get heavily downvoted by the real users in r/btc. They spend their time constantly causing as much drama as possible. At every opportunity they scream about "censorship" in r/btc while they are happy about the censorship in r/bitcoin. These people are astroturfers. What someone somewhere worked out, is that all you have to do to take down a community is say that you are on their side. It is an astoundingly effective form of psychological attack.] From: https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinMarkets/comments/6rxw7k/informative_btc_vs_bch_articles/dl8v4lp/?st=jc9sdfqv&sh=6659d957 Another comment in the thread: [If you read the white paper, a large part of why bitcoin was created was to remove the need for third parties when making transaction. Quite literally to get rid of the middle men. I think Blockstream want to bring back the middle men. They are achieving this by severely limiting bitcoin and then introducing competing technologies that work 'on top of' bitcoin. By making bitcoin too expensive to use directly, people will be forced to use these other service providers.

Blockstream refuses to say what their business model is, so it is difficult to put the pieces together.] And, another: [AXA, whose CEO is the current head of the Bilderberg Group, I shit you not. And yet, I have been giving them benefit of the doubt :/.] If you want to keep up with bitcoin the forum link is: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=68655.msg9293740#msg9293740
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-05/apple-says-latest-software-update-fixed-intel-security-flaws
All Mac iOS devices and systems are exposed and vulnerable to the recently discovered chip bugs known as Spectre and Meltdown, Apple confirmed on Thursday. The flaws, which as we discussed before, allow hackers unauthorized access to a computer’s memory and sensitive data, were discovered by security researchers at Google Project Zero on Wednesday. Security vulnerabilities called Meltdown and Spectre affect almost all modern CPUs, including those produced by Intel, AMD and ARM Holdings.

“All Mac systems and iOS devices are affected,” Apple acknowledged in a statement on Thursday, adding that no cases had yet been reported of customers being affected by the security flaws. Q THINK about the MAP provided to us by Bylan Louis Monroe The Looking Glass and which the map Q has instructed US to learn to read: https://throughthelookingglassnews.wordpress.com/2017/11/24/qanon-learn-to-read-the-map-hd/ You can look at the MAP and notice the triangle (pyramid) in the center. It highlights also the TRIAD which is the UNSEEN demonic forces which are working against humanity: Moloch, Lucifer, Saturn (Satan). There is reference in the map to Pleiadians and Greys. Some of these Ebens work on Earth, some off-world and some in different dimensions. The Dark Force energy use Finance and Confusion to keep US in a state of disorganization. We the People of the Rainbow Tribe must work together. Allow. And, learn. When you are ready to begin learning about remote viewing a possible starting point: https://www.youtube.com/user/FarsightPress/videos?disable_polymer=1 Please take a second to upvote this post if you enjoy my work.

About the author
Sandra is a psychologist, teacher and autism expert who has written individualized diets for thousands of people around the world. Since 1994 she has been giving 'Sara's Diet' consultations for families affected by autism. Understanding how humanity is undergoing enormous changes in response to the environmental stresses of the modern world, she has seen how the immune system is undergoing a transformation in its function, leading to the explosion in chronic health conditions that effect us emotionally and physically.Along with her husband, Max Desorgher, she formed World Community Autism Program, and traveled the world to teach people about the relationship between diet, environment and well-being.

For more information on her autism work, visit her consultation page on the WCAP website:
http://saras-autism-diet.freeservers.com/Sandra/Consultation.html

https://payhip.com/b/FC1Z Ascension Earth – Birth of a new Sun. Meet the Ancients
https://payhip.com/b/FGn9 The Power of Exile. Autism, a journey to recovery
https://payhip.com/b/IsW9 Autism, the Way Forward
https://payhip.com/b/lZ3M The Kingmakers