I think it's exactly the other way around; you get higher curation reward by voting after the 15 minute mark has passed. Right now the same rule applies, but with a 30 minute mark instead.
RE: Thoughts about the curation on the platform
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thoughts about the curation on the platform
Oh ok. I thought there was still a penalty for voting way past the 30 minute marker as opposed to as soon as it hits 30 minutes. THAT I think is unfair.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
No, there's no penalty at all for voting later, as long as you vote before the payout is sent. You do however get higher curation rewards if you vote before other people, so it still pays off to vote early on some posts.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Oh ok. Well, I just vote when I vote. It's good to know though. But I don't want to have to worry about when to vote. I just want to upvote ;) Thanks for letting me know.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I try to do the same thing :) I for one don't upvote stuff in order to get rewarded for it, but I can also see why some people would do that. At 100k+ SP the curation rewards are very high, so "randomly voting" can cost hundreds of dollars in lost rewards for them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well, randomly voting would be like a donation to someone else, but a donation requires you to spend money, whereas an upvote does not. I understand people want to benefit, but stinginess and greed is something I just don't get.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit