RE: Open Letter from Dapps to @justinsunsteemit

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Open Letter from Dapps to @justinsunsteemit

in delegations •  5 years ago 

To increase his sock puppet voting powers? Guys, that is the obvious part.

Please Kindly Explain
Would you kindly reach out to us, or explain in the comments why you have removed the delegations of these projects in the comments. We would like to catch up with you to discuss ways to help you manage delegations, what value the dapps create and ways forwards to restore the delegations for the Dapps that create value.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I suspect you're right, that's what he "thought" would happen. He's shown repeatedly that he doesn't know how this blockchain works.

What's your take on Dtube? Was that huge delegation reasonable?

Delegations do not transmit witness voting power. Undelegating will NOT give him more stake for witness voting.

Does he know that?

I'm pretty sure Ned told him that. Otherwise he would have undelegated way earlier?

I doubt Ned himself would have remembered to tell him.

Just like he forgot to tell him SteemIt wallet still has outgoing links to your shitty exchange lol

very good information

Really? I never knew that. Initially, I thought "one of these days, hes gonna remove the delegations so he can fully upvote his witnesses" but if what you're saying is true, then...

Delegation was coded this way... You can try it on your account. Delegating doesn't lower your witness voting power.

I'm going crazy if he doesn't even know this....