Leadership and leadership are different things. Leaders need to understand this. Only then do we get rid of the unconscious unconscious to have more talented people in the team (and such people in the team must be present.
Leaders desirable to be confident of "quartet" IN ALL, and engage in recruiting teams of people who are in some ways, maybe, and three, but in some cases - FIVE.
Leadership is needed to turn a group of people into a TEAM.
Leading is the same thing, this is a doubling of effort and talent in conditions where goals can already be forgotten (= Ego's work in Ego name).
Identifying talents and sharing responsibilities (according to these talents) is the main task of a good leader.
Every employee should be given the opportunity to feel himself or herself as the owner of the process in which you organize it, according to his or her talent, and only intervene with the real need for a course or vision correction.
The things I write are easy to understand and hard to do, because we are all emotional people.
Identifying talents, and sharing responsibilities, turning a group into a team is the leader's primary duty. All others are already non-leader, but "best worker".
Shot PsKontrolnye (question) about the topic.
Who first rides in an attack on the head of a knight: someone who is determined to lead or lead? Who is more likely to die in the first battle? Who will lead the army to victory? ..
