RE: Do Not Up-Vote The Following Steemians Because . . .

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Do Not Up-Vote The Following Steemians Because . . .

in dfhjdfj •  7 years ago  (edited)

how long can this briliant idea work if it just is bots voting for bots for points? allso wheres the downvote button?

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

@loz . . I have never downvoted anyone but I'm curious as to how to do it! I think you have to flag it.

I don't know about bots, but you are UP_VOTED and FOLLOWED

wont get you nothing!

@loz OKAY! I've been downvoted!! Point taken

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

didnt downvote!, dont know where the button is yet and probably wouldent bother anyway! alltho i disagree

@loz Is it the bot issue? This is just a list of people that followed and up-voted me! If you want your post to be seen it seems like you would have to promote it! This is just a tool!

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

i just find it a shame , i came to find out what this was about as it sounded like a good idea to reward good content what i see is most here are just tools for someone else and content is secondary

In the end, when there are 400 million people on Steemit, content and WIT will rule, but in the beginning it is a bit much to ask of the public to follow that rule. This is the Blockchain and it is unrealistic to ask people to rely on content alone. To require content alone would also require a "hard fork" and that is risky for the whole platform, especially if it doesn't work. Let human nature run it's course. Anything else brings probable religious paradigms and this blockchain model won't function to support paradigms.