Now I understand, is it possible to connect to two blockchains at the same time. Thinking of it , it might be a waste of resources but it might still have its benefits, access to multiple userbase and all.
RE: My Message To DLive As They Move Away From Steem
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My Message To DLive As They Move Away From Steem
Yeah, you definitely could do that; would be more resource consuming for sure, but it's absolutely feasible, and makes sense if the benefit outweighs the cost. Apps are generally a mix of non-blockchain and blockchain code, with the actions a user can take, such as uploading a video/making a post/uploading test results usually often being stored in a local database, AS WELL as the blockchain, with the blockchain usually acting as the permanent, reliable record, but the local DB being utilized for speed and efficiency.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I see, I always presumed the blockchain could only store text because of the blocksize and Dapps linked the blockchain to external storages
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You can see examples of the type of stuff the steem blockchain holds here:
https://steemblockexplorer.com/block/26378428
and you can see raw transaction data related to transactions verified in a given block by choosing the link to the transaction id for any of the multiple transactions occurring on that page! :)
You could store bytecode, for example, on the steem blockchain if you wanted to, and that bytecode could be representative of video data, etc.; now, it is at a DApps discretion what they try to upload/what they do upload and how they divide resources, but the possibilities of what you store on the blockchain are limitless (with an associated cost, of course).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit