Do you think HF21 will backfire? And if so, in what way.
In this post, seven possible ways are described how the upcoming hard-fork could potentially backfire. Do you believe that HF21 is going to backfire? And if you believe it will, in what ways?
- No, not in any of these ways or any other ways.
- Yes, but not in any of these ways (comment)
- Yes, by killing social interaction
- Yes, by hindering onboarding and driving away smaller fish
- Yes, by creating a flourishing bid-bot economy
- Yes, by pushing passive stake holders to sell their stake
- Yes, by escalating flag wars
- Yes, by shifting bad behaviour up-curve
- Yes, by not adressing inflation
- Other (comment)
Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Meh.
I'm more concerned with the emergency next fork, how much worse can it get.
It's been downhill since hf16.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Thanks for contributing to the dPoll content.
You have been upvoted from our community curation account (@dpoll.curation) in courtesy of This Guy... @bluerobo.
Come, join our community at dPoll discord server.
If you want to support dPoll curation, you can also delegate some steem power. Quick steem connect links to delegate:
50SP | 100SP | 250SP | 500SP
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Complicated. What do you mean with "Yes, by not adressing inflation"?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Flag wars won't get that escalated. But the incentive to create more content won't work well. Those o already have a large following will do well. DAPPs with voting bots like @steemhunt or even @dlike will do fine. But real long form content will reduce in frequency.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
I do not understand this enough to know what will happen.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
I guess people will make less content. I certainly don't feel like making more content ad I had already stopped long articles because I couldn't get much traction even after using bots. Now I stick with STEEM Hunt for most part.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
At this point, we're waiting to see when the HF is going to happen, and then, to see what the immediate and long term effects will be.
The EIP hinges on those who have yet to demonstrate an ongoing desire to curate, but rather extract as much passive income as possible, to do an about face. I don't know. It's difficult to believe that people who need some sort of economic incentive to do what they could be doing (and arguably should be doing) all along will suddenly do something different, when really, for all the talk, I don't know that there's enough incentive even in the EIP to do so. It comes down to a matter of time and application. Passive income versus actively doing something for it.
So, even without the detriments I've voted for, there's high potential for no real change because human behavior is hard to overcome.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Voted for
I don't think that HF21 would backfire in any way. Certainly not by "killing social interaction".
Nowadays there is little to no social interaction on Steem. In fact, I believe that HF21 will be good for Steem.
How and why?
I am on the Steem blockchain since 2017.05.17.
No matter what I do, what I post, what I write about, almost (or literally) no one cares about my posts. I am earning cents (or even nothing) with my posts, because sometimes the pending payout is not reach the payout threshold ($0.02).
The real, human comments are also rare.
Nowadays I don't even use Steemit for blogging.
People are selfish and greedy.
Many people are writing blog posts, but only a few people cares about other people's blog posts.
This results in hundreds of thousands of ignored (or simply not seen) posts, and in the same amount of disappointed users.
Many people left (and still leaving) the Steem blockchain because of their disappointment in the platform.
Nowadays there are more than 1.2 million Steem accounts, but nowadays only less than 50 000 accounts are active daily.
I think that these numbers are telling a lot about the current state of the Steem blockchain.
Maybe the HF21 will help decreasing the number of bloggers (and/or the number of content creators in general), and increase the number of curators and maybe the real, human interaction with it.
If this will happen, then HF21 will be good for Steem.
We (the the users and the community of the whole Steem blockchain) need to find a good balance between content creators and content curators, otherwise this platform will wither and die.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit