I watched your video
Your theory No 1
No. Once they destroy property and use violence, they cannot be categorised as 'harmless youth who are going through a phase'. It would make more sense to compare or categorise them as thugs - same as the street gangs...after all, should we use the same excuse for them also?
I recall that when Antifa first started to make an appearance, the kids who had joined talked openly about being paid by NGOs belonging to Soros - remember when their payment was delayed and they threatened to attck the nGO offices? Soros = Globalists, which means you are safe in assuming they had the backing of the Agencies ad MSM
Even if there is a hardcore group that will continue (after being declared terrorists) what is important is that the numbers be reduced, or else they become an army - unthinkingly obedient to the enemies of the country.
I mean the majority of members are young kids and that they are no real threat. I live in a big city and I see these types around a lot, they are not the ones making the news. It's like they are just wearing a band shirt or something, it's just the thing to do. They are not involving themselves in protests or any of the violence. They may believe condone it or they support it but they are not committing it.
The violent ones I see as well but in much smaller groups and less often. That is why I think most 'members' are likely to drop out as they are just involved because they have a romantic view of what is happening. I could be wrong but that is what I've come to by seeing them out.
I did see that they had some sort of Soros funding, that is super shady. I wonder how that will pan out if they get this classification as terrorist lol
But I agree any reduction is number is a good thing when it comes to them.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit