One does not preclude the other does it?
Actually one does preclude the other because if you were euthanized then you would be dead and if you are dead then you couldn't post on Steemit. I also find it funny that you accuse me of not reading yet you failed to read the definition of euthanize that I included in my comment.
I said intervention on 5 homicides.
From your comment: "These people euthanized me, more than once, "
Start with my hospital stay in Canada when I was 4.
Canada is not the United States. Furthermore, you cannot extrapolate, from a single incident, something happening in another country.
Methinks you need to take more care in what you write because what you are writing now is inconsistent, incorrect and near incoherent.
You miss the blatant point and make largely a fool of you for it. Render a person dead, then you did murder. Someone coming by later to fix that does not vindicate you. You are wrong on about all of this so far. And only come here to find fault and not facts.
Canada proves involve of FBI and large scale oversight. It also proves murder since someone killed a child via drowning and walked (boated) away.
"Methinks you need to take more care in what you write because what you are writing now is inconsistent, incorrect and near incoherent."
Your slurs prove you a fraud and liar overall. I am done with you.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Or you are not making your case well.
I wil acknowledge your ability to judge me when you answer this simple question:
How can you have euthanized/executed by the state several times and still be here. After all, if the state euthanizes/executes you they are not likely to revive you due to the limits placed on the state to euthanize/execute people.
Your writing style is horribly convoluted and your logic is non-existent. Those are issues that need to be fixed before any real conversation can be had.
Relevance? I ask because you have not tied that part of your comment into our "conversation" at all.
They are not slurs but an appraisal of what you have written. If you don't like that THEN WRITE BETTER. Also, my critiques of your writing do not prove that I am a liar or a fraud and I would kindly ask you refrain from ad hominem attacks. I am sure that you won't bother to read this but what I said was critiquing your writing whereas what you said incorrectly attacked my character.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You have a problem with ad hominem overall in the want to claim you can't read what I wrote. And then offer logical fallacy on a proven point, being false equivalency. They made it, I witness to it.
You lost it on me not being coherent. A slur.
For you? You can't get past not knowing what murder is.
Start there. And beyond that, ask a pertinent question as opposed to finding fault with me.
YOUR FAULT !
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
"Your writing style is horribly convoluted and your logic is non-existent. Those are issues that need to be fixed before any real conversation can be had."
Another slur. See point about you not knowing what murder is. Or disputing on other valid points as being of import.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit