Yeah... This is going to cause A LOT of stink if they don't just put it back, lol. LOOK, we'll pretend you never touched if you just put it back where you found it.
RE: Bill to Reverse Net Neutrality Repeal Gets 30th Sponsor...But Will Still Fail
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Bill to Reverse Net Neutrality Repeal Gets 30th Sponsor...But Will Still Fail
I do not think I get your point man.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As in, reinstate the Net Neutrality they allowed the FCC to appeal (or not reinstate themselves, I can't remember which at the moment).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
So you never even read the bill, have no clue what is in it and still want to jump on that bandwagon to have the government regulate your internet eh?
Are you really thinking or are you just trying to be accepted by the ignorant mob?
Maybe it would help to know the vast majority does not support government regulation of the free market. Only jobless antifa kids and the diversity hires do. They are loud but they are few in number.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well no I haven't had a few hours to read thru their excessively long bill. I never jump on bandwagons. Tend to be the last one to. I just asked a question to as which it meant to over turn it. I know they like to name bills obtusely or even opposite what they are for. So, I was under the impression that the FCC had rejected the free access of the internet, and that was Net Neutrality. So, the government overturning said overturn would be a plus. But, if I am misunderstanding any of this, I was asking. Thank you for the information. I'll be sure to ride my bandwagon to another source of information.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Ya watch out for that band wagon.
Of course it seems like Net Neutrality is all about internet freedom. That is why they pick words like neutrality that tug on your feels.
It is the same for the Affordable Health Care Act because no one could afford it.
All Net Neutral did was poorly attempt to dictate how ISPs allocate their bandwidth. The reasons why the law was useless are all first year economics. In short the ISP would lose billions and likely go out of business if they tried to bundle Netflicks, which was the main terror of the ignorant mob.
What law does make sense is already in place. It is not legal for media companies to claim territory in the US. That law just needs to be enforced.
As for the internet being free that is up to ICANN which is up for sale to the highest bidder thanks to Obummer.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Well s&%# I didn't know that last part, for sure! So, Net Neutrality, the bill, is trash. As far as fingers in the honeypot, that is the internet, that's already done. I appreciate the clarity here. Sometimes it gets difficult to discern truth with all the noise and sources out there. Cheers!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Woohoo!
A Steem penny! xD
I could get to like this.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I bumped into something that might bring you a laugh or frustration, specifically on this topic, so I figured this a good place to share. Now, knowing things on this level are done for a reason. Some people have different agendas. What are your reactions to this: Burger King made a surprisingly good ad about net neutrality. Obviously, something cooked up for the consumers, no pun intended. But, are they explaining it even close to correct? Why would they speak against something now portrayed to me as something the corporations would want? Or just a big time wasting distraction, deed is done? I appreciate your angle on things, and your time. Cheers! When I have more than pennies, it'll be better :).
P.S. - Doesn't this behave similar to the blockchain? If so, is it really that bad? If you value your time so much you will pay for speed, then you should, in comparison, be providing a service highly valued by society enough to have said funds to spend excessively. Every measure more requires exponentially more energy to provide, so it's very indicative of how nature works in a way...without straying from the point here.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit