Fukushima and the collapseof the Pacific Ocean ecosystem?
Posted using Partiko Android
RE: Nuclear: Safest of Conventional Power Sources?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Nuclear: Safest of Conventional Power Sources?
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
More myth than reality. Fukushima was bad, but the damage was mostly local. A coal fired plant puts out huge amounts of radioactivity. Something people don't talk about!
And, tbh, there is a lot of pollution from solar panels: their manufacture and disposal are still problematic in many ways.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I'm certainly no expert, and have a strong conspiracy bent to boot, but the more I read about it it seems like a lot of disinfo/ propaganda. I don't believe it was nearly as bad as we have been told.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
After seeing the total collapse of the small critters in the tide pools since then?
Have to say it's bigger fact it's worse than they say.
New returning salmon have crazy tumors and defects...
Besides the "background" radiation on the pacific coast shores massively spiking?
Posted using Partiko Android
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit