Scientists Plan To Refreeze The Melting Arctic

in environment •  7 years ago  (edited)

0.jpg

The adverse effects of global warming and climate change on the world are quite clear. There is a debate going on between some people whether or not this is human caused, but I think they are missing the point.

The bottom line is that average global temperatures are rising and almost each year is declared as the hottest in history. Polar ice caps are melting, climate is changing, droughts are rampant and it seems as though the world is becoming slowly uninhabitable.

A large reason for that, I believe, is us humans. The technological progress that we have made in the last couple centuries have come at a price and our use of Earth’s resources and fossil fuels to drive our civilisation, has had an adverse impact on the planet.

Now, ironically, we must look towards technology to solve these issues for us and save the planet because if we don’t, sooner or later, there might not even be anything to save at all.

Melting Arctic Sheets

1.jpg

One of the most obvious effects of global warming has been the melting of the polar ice caps. Every now and then we get to hear news and see images of polar ice caps breaking into large chunks and melting away.

This is severe in case of the Arctic sheets as the amount of ice there has decreased by 13% each decade since the 1980s and according to scientists, if we do nothing, it will disappear by the year 2030.

This will lead to the endangering of many species and will also cause even more warming of the planet as the Arctic ice sheets essentially serve as reflectors of solar radiation from the sun back to the space.

There is another serious issue of rising of sea levels which threatens people living in coastal areas all around the globe. If sea levels continue to rise, a lot of the land under settlement today, will become uninhabitable, increasing the pressure on the remaining land mass.

Refreezing The Arctic Sheets?

2.jpg

A group of scientists have come up with a really crazy plan to solve the Arctic crisis. According to them, if the Arctic ice sheets are melting, why not simply refreeze them. Simple right? Not quite!

Their plan includes using 10 million wind-powered pumps to cover 10% of the existing ice sheets with sea water. To do this, they will need all those pumps to have an output capacity of 7.5 kg of water per second just to add 3 feet of ice over the 10% area. The water pumped over these caps will freeze quickly due to the sub-zero temperatures.

Also, since they will need to add 4 feet of water for the ice to grow 3 feet thicker, this will bring down the water level of the surrounding considerably. In fact, it will have such a huge impact that, for every year they do this, they postpone the loss of the ice caps by 17 years!!

This sounds like a great plan but it has a few drawbacks. For one, it would take a lot of money to do this, costing $50 billion to carry out the refreezing for just a year and that too over a 10% area. It would also require 10 million tonnes of steel a year.

Skepticism

3.jpg

While the plan sounds effective, there are a lot of people who are skeptic. Apart from the high cost and technical difficulties of carrying out the refreezing, there are other more macro-level issues at play.

For example, there would still be a rising level of CO2 emissions and this will just keep increasing the global temperatures and keep melting those ice sheets. This might render the project useless or at the most it would serve as a bandaid.

Many believe that we should instead focus on reducing and completely halting our dependence on fossil fuels for our energy needs and look for cleaner sources of energy.

What I personally believe is that we could run the project for a year which would buy us at least some time to implement other changes that would have a permanent or long lasting effects. After all $50 billion doesn’t look too large when compared to what the world spends on defence!


All images have been taken from the public domain.

chibi.png

Follow me @sauravrungta for more future content.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Global warming is a natural cycle, in fact it's has a trace long ago. Its a process of natural selection.

You said it. The planet has had many cycles of warming and freezing. The last mini-ice age was only a few centuries ago... and happened right after the medieval warm period!

Doesn't matter if it is natural or man made. It's happening and the consequences are real and we should act to deal with them.

He's trying to tell you that this is nature. It's a natural cycle. Just let the Earth run it's course and do what it has to do.
We should act to adapt, not to interfere.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

Yes you are right @sauravrungta and at last we have to face the consequences

On a positive note. This could cut the travel time of goods and services between Europe and Japan/China by a few hours as ships can reliably go North alongside the Norwegian coasts to Asia, rather than either 1. Around Africa, or 2. Across the Atlantic and alongside Canada. Both of which takes many hours extra.

Oh yeah. But then comes all the costs of rising sea levels, droughts and the need for people to move and rebuild :/
I say we try to fix it instead.;)

haha the negatives outweigh the positives by a mile! LOL Yep, fixing it is in our best interests, despite what most people say ;)

i think you missed a zero in that cost figure...this article that explains the same scheme that you have said $500 billion not 50bn.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/12/plan-to-refreeze-arctic-before-ice-goes-for-good-climate-change

I think that $500 billion figure is for 10 years. If we did it for only 1 year, it would cost $50 billion.

What does your body do when you get a virus? It overheats, to kill the invading pest. This is the Earth's immune system in action.
The arrogance of humanity to think we are anything more than a surface nuisance, and then to think that we should alter the weather and the climate...

Really good point of view!

Yeah, but we should still try to look for ways to heal it ourselves too, even if it is for our own sakes.

Very good article hits and thanks for sharing this material

Indeed!! reSteemed

Thank you for reading :)

bogus.
neither the arctic NOR the antarctic are melting.
oh...odd that that antarctica has the biggest concentration of volcanoes on the planet under the ice.

oh...hey...the arctic ocean has ACTIVE volcanoes on the ocean floor..deep deep under the surface...heating the water.
and YET.

both the arctic AND the Antarctic..are gaining new Ice.

volcanoes heating water yeah good logic :P

yeah...imagine that...ultra hot lava..underwater...heating the water.
who'd a thunk?

@hassanabid I know google is evil, but google it... There was a new discovery within the last week, the largest volcano fields on the planet were just found, under Antarctica. Don't just "believe" what you always believed or you never learn anything, prove or debunk everything. Case by case, over and over.
Now here is how sad our situation is... I know you CAN use google. I suspect you will not, so you will never see this if I do not post it:
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2143924-there-are-almost-100-new-volcanoes-hiding-under-antarctic-ice/
So now I posted it. Now you can tell me what a bad source that is, rather than go back and google it and find a source YOU trust. I hope I am wrong, but this "global warming issue" is just about the best divide and conquer tactic our evil masters ever came up with. People cannot even CONSIDER listening to the other side, it is like heresy, they fear being outcast from their social group if they learn something that is not acceptable to their peers...
So go ahead, ignore the article, it will not surprise me or even disappoint me. I will love you, my dear, fellow broken little human, in all your glorious imperfection. But you will continue to labor under curable ignorance, and that makes me a little sad.
Please, if you choose to read the article and admit that you knee-jerked that reply without fact checking and that you are wrong, do know that I WILL love you a little more... can't help it, I am a sucker for a human who will discard wrong beliefs and embrace truth where they find it.

So, apparently now they're saying, as the caps melt the relief of pressure on the surface crust is reduced, thus allowing the magma and volcanic gases to rise - thus creating more volcanic activity, which in turn will furthur heat the poles.
https://www.livescience.com/25936-climate-change-causes-volcanism.html

Hi. I am a volunteer bot for @SteemitBOT that upvoted you.
Your post was chosen at random, as part of the advertisment campaign for @SteemitBOT

@SteemitBOT is meant to help minnows get noticed by re-steeming their posts and upvote To use the bot, one must follow it for at least 3 hours, and then make a transaction where the memo is the url of the post.

Please Follow and UPVOTE

How much energy is needed to pump all the water?

I am not sure but they are trying to use wind power to power all those pumps.

One of the most obvious effects of global warming has been the melting of the polar ice caps absolutely right Saurav bro

Thank you for reading :)

I think this is just a crazy idea in written in a paper. But ideas are always welcome ;)

Better to do something crazy than to do nothing at all. I think saving the world requires a hint of crazy.

You are right about the first part. About the second... maybe ;p

Quite the plan, seems a little expensive, but hopefully there will be more funding for the environment in the future.

It definitely is expensive but we spend a lot more in a lot of other useless things. For a change, if we could just put the money where it is needed most, we could all live better lives.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

When man tries to change what earth does or fix what man did, its usually disacterous 😧

Yeah, that's why we need to restore things the way nature intended them to be and this will help achieve that.

  ·  7 years ago (edited)

I'm all for improvisation and I agree that global warming IS a problem...but isn't the idea of using technology to re-freeze the Arctic meddling again, perhaps causing more unforseen problems? Perhaps the caps are meant to melt, perhaps mother nature has a plan to sort it out herself? It's meddling with nature that has gotten us in to trouble in the first place.

Yeah I agree that meddling has gotten us into this situation in the first place but I also think that if we could use technology to just reverse what we did, it would do good.

important info ty

Thanks for reading :)

Sounds like the basid for a science fiction short film.

It sure does! I am sure if this is successful, movies would be made on it!

Thanks for posting this info. I didn't know scientists were looking at this as an option. I think it will take multiple, multiple different ways of doing things and LOTs of different technological options to slow or reverse the damage humans have done to the climate and planet. I hope, for the sake of our little ones and future generations, that we are up to the challenge.

Yeah, you are absolutely right. It will take a combo effort including several different options to finally restore the planet to its natural state. We owe that much to future generations.

Amen

In this case I say to let nature run its cause...

If we let it do that, there will be dire consequences for humanity.

We pollute the atmosphere and we must face consequences. Refreezing it is just postponing the consequences and making it worse for the future. Scientists have a neck for experimenting with the Earth and yet they don't fully understand it. We only have one Earth, should things go haywire the rich will go to Mars and where will that leave the rest of us?

Yes, that is an interesting point but there are efforts being made in other areas as well and I hope we can manage to do the right things in the nick of time.

I hope so too.

the energy needed to run this thing would still have an effect on the planet, instead of doing this, if they really want to save the planet so bad, then simply shut down what ever mankind is using to cause this effect, but they don't because companies would lose trillions of dollars just to leave mother nature alone

Actually, they will be using wind power to power those pumps. I have mentioned that in the post.

It sounds like sci-fi. Thank you for share it

haha! Everything does until it is achieved ;)

Seems like a worthwhile attempt. Upvoted.

Yeah, it's better to do something crazy than to do nothing at all.

It's a crazy plan. I hope it works.

Yeah it sure is! Let's see how they do it.

They are obviously trying to mend the ice wall so that we do not see what is behind it.

;0)

I do not what you mean :P

awww it's so sad... what about the great barrier reef! If we all just biked to work, stop littering... that would be the best solution.

Or maybe our alien programmers could just help us out and eliminate it for us all together :P

It will definitely take a combination of thousand different things to recover the loss in the natural state of the planet. OR maybe just ask them aliens!! lol :P

hehehe "We come in peace"

Man this sounds beyond craziness really

Yeah I know. Almost sci-fi like! But many things have sounded crazier until they became reality. Planes for example.

I can donate my old fridge if that will help.

haha We would need hundreds of millions of them lol

Colonize Jupiter lol!

I wonder how we would live on a gas planet!!

Love the crazy ideas. I think we have to work on both side, ie dramatically reduce CO2 creation and execute these type of ideas. The increase of world population is so fast, and the standard of living of billions of people increasing as well, will exponentially increase CO2 creation, I'm afraid we simple cannot reduce it by transforming faster from oil to wind and solar energy.

Yes it has to be both which is what I suggested at last too. Population increase will just increase the demand on Earth's resources and CO2 will continue to rise if we don't complete the transition soon which looks very hard at this point. So, crazy ideas like this need to be tried out, in my opinion.

Fully agree with you, any crazy idea shall be tried, and at the same time the lobby for clean energy shall be increased. Fortunately, solar and wind energy is getting less expensive then oil based energy, so I see the tipping point coming. But still the oil companies are very powerful, so their lobby need to be countered.

You are absolutely right. Their lobbying is still strong and one of the main reasons why we are still using the fossil fuels.

This is a hot topic nowadays. Everyone have the responsiblity to take care of there surrounding.
Thanks for sharing

Yes, pretty hot topic right now. Thanks for reading :)

Regardless of whether the melting ice caps are the result of mankind or just nature running it's course, $50 billion is a steal if it will prevent all the coastal cities around the world from being drowned.

That's exactly how I think as well!!