RE: Does Freedom Require Radical Transparency or Radical Privacy?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Does Freedom Require Radical Transparency or Radical Privacy?

in eos •  7 years ago 

Being held at gunpoint will not work if attacker can only transfer money to their public account.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

You're assuming that the attacker cares that everyone knows that they have your money. Governments certainly don't care. In fact, publicizing how easily they crushed you and seized your money will probably make it easy to extort money from other victims in the future.

That would only work if our public account is implemented in our hand or head for example... does it remind you something?

And that no man might buy or sell, except he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.