Are "permissioned" implementations of Ethereum helping the case of crypto-currencies?

in ethereum •  7 years ago 

Just the other minute I learned from @boxmining that the two pharmaceutical giants Pfizer and Genentech are developing an an enterprise-focused Ethereum-based smart contract platform, which should help to prevent counterfeit medicines (read the original news article here).

According to Fortune, the MediLedger Project is using Quorum, an enterprise-focused Ethereum-based smart contract platform developed by J.P. Morgan - quelle ironie!

At the first moment I thought this was pretty cool. But then I was wondering whether this brings any benefit to the crypto-community resp. if it helps to advance the case of crypto-currencies. Because after all, we're not talking about an open blockchain, but about a "permissioned" one, meaning that private entities are in control.

And this is where my questions begin and I was hoping that someone of you, dear readers, might have a better understanding of the matter, than I do.

Basically, I was wondering whether these permissioned platforms, running on top of the Ethereum protocol would also need to buy Gas from the Ethereum-network, in order to execute their transactions?

If this would be the case, permissioned implementations of Ethereum or other blockchains would help putting forward the crypto-community as a whole. Otherwise it would be only to the profit of J.P. Morgan and the company using the ethereum protocol.

I'd love to discuss with you in the comment-section below, what you think about Pfizer using Ethereum.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!