RE: Facebook Invests Millions in Community Leaders - What Steemit Inc Should Learn From This

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Facebook Invests Millions in Community Leaders - What Steemit Inc Should Learn From This

in facebook •  7 years ago 

I think you've inadvertently identified one of the key problems with incentive-fueled democratic systems. The simple question behind this is - what is money and what is its purpose. I think money is defined by 3 things: 1) you give it, 2) you get it, and 3) it has the ability to move value in space and/or in time (like a container). Anything that can carry value like that and that you are willing to give to others (for a reason/utility) and that others are willing to accept (for its value) is money. Be it Fiat or crypto. But here is the thing - crypto is more than that. It offers other functionalities that make it money+. plus what? Well, that's the 64,000 $ question :) If it were only money - same as Fiat - the problem would have been very clear - a strong enough currency in a community will become translatable to power - as has happened in the US for example. This type of "Democracy" that is in fact an oligopoly needs to be restrained by powerful checks and balances - and those hardly ever provide full cover. In the case of steemit - and I, as you know am a total noob, so trying to tread carefully - the token mechanisms are trying to do several things at the same time: provide compensation, encourage participation, reflect true value being generated on the platform by its users and probably more. This creates a fairly complex structure that is difficult to balance. So what is the steem token (with its different phases and transformations) - is it simple money? Is it an interaction facilitation mechanism? Is it a tool for "social mobility?"
My 2 cents:

  1. I would invest in the identification of potential "conflict of interests" - cases in which one user may have a strong incentive to promote not based on PoB.
  2. I would separate different types of activities and limit the influence that more powerful users have. Probably with a function that tapers off - so at first doubling your power will double your influence, but as you get more power that effect diminishes.
  3. I would revisit the basic question of why do we have tokens - what is their function and purpose and how do we make sure they perform it. Some tokens have a balance keeping job while others are pure remuneration for investing brain power. In fact, I should have started with #3 - as it will sketch a map of where the platform may need corrections.
    Dang - already too long and the reply edit box is tiny :) -
    thanks for making me think about this
    Goodstuff and Goodnight
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!