"don’t whine when journalists point out the obvious, that Steemit.com is going to fail under the immense weight of the poorly written crap that is published here."

I agreed on that point, and others, yet you claim I say otherwise, hilarious! This is telling, that you couldn't read and understand something said, due to your fixation on grammar.

All of your criticism of grammar and spelling doesn't seem to enable you to read clearly, so it's not worth much to focus on such issues if you can't even comprehend what is written anyways. Are a few little grammar mistakes preventing you from comprehending what is said?

If you actually read, I agree with the author on that point. Thanks for trying to make a point yet fail miserably.

Yes, point out the weakness. Grammar and spelling, OK. But your other statements are just meant to disparage, and that's it. How?

"horrible writing"

"contributor’s juvenile writing does"

"poorly structured sentences piled high with improper grammar and spelling errors"

I'm calling you as a bullshitter. Be specific. Where do such errors prevent an accurate representing of the information or of the issue? OMG... he forgot a 't' on 'the'... eeek! It's a garbage post! Horrible! Juvenile! LMAO. What a fallacious mindset you have. The content, what it says? Who cares, the grammar Nazi says.

You are just shitting over everything with a general wide-brush in an attempt to invalidate the review, simply based on grammar or spelling, which apprently prevents you from accurately assessing what was said? Yet other people, can understand, despite such errors. So while you present yourself as having some aura of authority over what is "valid" material in terms of grammar or spelling, you still couldn't comprehend someone agreeing with someone else? Good job on your intellectual abilities.

I didn't shit all over your piece by focusing on one thing and using that one thing to attempt to dismiss your whole piece. I honestly assessed it and evaluated it, which is something you apparently can't do here.

And by the way, this is not a newspaper. There are no editors. If you want to establish some of that, go ahead. I put information out, and do pay attention to grammar and spelling, but it's not my 100% focus. I also use text-to-speech sometimes. Sorry for all my "horrible worthless" trash "juvenile" posts as a result... what a baseless claim to make on the part of an alleged "intellectual" who is a journalist. You don't even care about the information content itself (you couldn't even understand when I agreed with the author) it's all about the grammar. What a joke!

So to recap, I clearly stated I agreed with the author (you) on the point you claim I don't, indicating your focus on grammar is preventing you from reading properly, making your reasoning fallacious when presenting your case. The words you used to describe the post reflect your bias and blindness to accurately assess information when you encounter grammatical errors. Something for you to work on.