I am saving up 3 STEEM to buy a SteemConnect app. I just got 1.413 STEEM from my power down. This brings me up to 2.129 STEEM. I might have enough STEEM by this time next week to buy the service; So, I cancelled my power down.
I want the app so that I can create an online fitness game called "vagabond spirit." Basically, your vagabond spirit decides to take off on its own. For each step you take in the real world, your vagabond spirit takes a step in the vagabond world.
To make the game fun, I wanted to include an online exchange that the vagabonds use to buy and sell stuff as they voyage around the globe. The market would work as follows: Your spirit would earn tokens as it walked about. The spirit could use the tokens to buy items in the game.
The game will include collectibles and other fun things.
Here is the problem: If my local state determines that the exchange is gambling; they can send me to jail. If the SEC determines that the exchange is a security; the SEC can take everything I own and I will probably go to jail.
The laws are vague. Simply creating a game where imaginary creatures invest in imaginary things might be illegal.
So, I've been reading up on local and federal security laws and getting really depressed in the process. Reports say that becoming a broker takes several hundred hours of work with examines and what not and costs up to $100,000. I didn't see a full break down of that figure.
Securities are actually regulated through "public/private partnerships" often called "self regulating organizations." These SROs are essentially unelected governing bodies with the power to impose enormous fines.
There are SROs in each state and some national ones such as FINRA.
FINRA (Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) bills itself as "a not-for-profit organization dedicated to investor protection and market integrity."
During school I was indoctrinated to see all not-for-profits as good and profit. Little brain cells still fire when I hear that phrase.
FINRA is a Non-Profit. Profit is bad; therefore FINRA is good.
As I read more and more and more about the organization I get shivers down my spine. This group is pure unadulterated evil.
It is a non-elected entity that has control over any defined security that people create in the United States. If you create a security to share equity in a project, they can and will bear down on you for trading an unregistered security.
It appears that they spew out billions of dollars in fines. When I refreshed the screen, they reported a paltry $2.75 million fine because a company failed to fill out forms U4 or U5.
Goodness knows, the world cannot function without forms U4 and U5.
It appears that the company "LPL" is a billion dollar firm that has been a broker since 1973. They have a legion of lawyers on call. It looks like FINRA also issued a $10 million fine because they did not report some large cash withdrawals to the anti-money-laundering system.
The reports says they paid the fine through an "Acceptance, Waiver and Consent." There is no trial or recourse. Companies get huge fines from an unelected body and they are so cowed by the system that they just pay up.
The Founders of this nation must be reeling in torment every time this group of unelected tyrants acts.
As I read about the way that government does security regulation I am overcome with a feeling that the system is outright evil. For example, the huge costs needed to become a broker forces brokers to engage in activities designed to pay back the huge cost. If you had to pay $100,000 to become a broker; you would be scrambling to engage in activities to pay that enormous sum back ... wouldn't you?
The regulations create self fulfilling prophecies while failing to protect the public from the cons of the big banks.
This "public private partnership" (aka an un-elected bureaucracy) is regulating the securities industry in ways that concentrates wealth into just a few hands while impoverishing the people at large.
What I would be curious to know is what the implications would be for scrapping this regulatory body entirely. What would be the fallout, presumably? Increased fraud and scams? Money laundering? What is this organizations “purpose”?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
It appears that there have been numerous investment "schemes" in which people lost money. The body owes its existence to people who lost money and who cried in the night: "There aught to be a regulation" against what happened to me.
Clearly there is a need for bodies that evaluate the integrity of securities. If this body didn't exists, there would have been other bodies formed to evaluate the integrity of securities.
If this centralized body didn't exists, my guess is that we would have seen a huge number of investor lawsuits along with the formation of independent efforts to verify securities.
Personally, I think that a large number of independent efforts would be more robust than a centralized effort.
The big problem with one huge centralized bureaucracy is that such systems destroy innovation.
So, I should point out that STEEM could be described as a financial scheme. Everyone on this platform has a wallet full of crypto-currency. There is nothing behind this currency other than an algorithm spinning in the sky.
This program fits some definitions of a Ponzi Scheme. The value of the STEEM in my account is 100% dependent on someone coming in and buying STEEM at a future date. We could all wake up one day and find that our STEEM went poof.
How angry would people be if STEEM went poof? Would there be an enraged outcry for regulation!
That said, the effect of the regulation is that it prevented people from openly exploring interesting financial devices like STEEM. I mentioned that I started developing software for exchanges a decade ago and stopped out of fear of regulation.
Rather than talk about what would happen if FINRA didn't exist. I would rather engage in a conversation about what people can do to replace FINRA.
The open ledger and smart contracts of Crypto create a world with far greater disclosure than the founders of FINRA could have imagined in 1939 when the SEC created NASD (predecessor of FINRA).
Can we create such a thing without getting trounced upon by the SEC?
I think the basic open ledger and full disclosure being developed in the crypto world could be used to replace antiquated regulation.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
@marcstevens has your hole card, if you can play it.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit