How Does Your Steem Feed Look?

in fknmayhem-tumbls •  7 years ago  (edited)

Steemian @blunderbabe debates with themselves, and the Steem community, how their blog looks and whether a blog which consists of mostly resteems can be a turn-off: The Great Resteeming dilemma & Other Unwritten Steemiquette Questions

It’s something that should be obvious – I know when I look at blogs, if it’s all resteems, chances are I won’t follow (unless those resteemed pieces are really good or relevant). But I never gave it much thought – for my own blog - until the last 24 hours.

Obviously, by mere virtue of actively posting to this account, I am biased and think that curated resteems can give away a lot about a person’s interest and also orientation. Especially if not given any opportunity to add commentary. The latter which I circumvent with this account, as explained here.


Image borrowed from blunderbabe’s post

Without possibility to add commentary, resteems almost serve as endorsements and even when not meant as such, often they will be read as such. It doesn’t matter whether a no-endorsement policy is added to one’s Steem bio. Most will not check that out anyway. 🤷‍♂️

It finally clicked if anyone is judging me by what’s on my blog – it’s hardly a reflection of actual me, let alone, Steemit me. Thing is, I have stuff to say. I have strong opinions and lots of ideas and comments – not all of it rubbish, some of it maybe even interesting – but no one would catch even a glimpse of that unless they spent a serious amount of time sifting through my feed.

An interesting point also raised is implicitly the discovery element in @blunderbabe’s post. Mostly because we often tend to see but the usual suspects or those who follow the usual suspects but are merely minnows searching themselves. Searching for success.

It makes me wonder am I the only casual Steemian out there? Is anyone else on here erratically sans a long term plan? Sometimes I feel like there are only newbie minnows with lofty goals and seasoned Steemians with admirable wallets, engaged audiences, and well-crafted niches.

Head over to @blunderbabe’s post and don’t forget to chime in in the comments: The Great Resteeming dilemma & Other Unwritten Steemiquette Questions

separator

Hey there, this is @FknMayhem's alt account.

Here I mostly tumbl (resteem with added commentary and attitude or snark, a form of advanced curation Steem doesn't offer), zapp, post to forums, and submit other miscellaneous mischief. The latter which may or may not include more personal content.

There may be days it can be noisy around here, follow at your own risk. Alternatively, follow my attempts at more in-depth own content on my main account, @FknMayhem.

I am also on zeh Titter. Feel free to pitch me your worthy suggestions there. But make them worth my time. Once Steemit/busy.org has an option to integrate `beneficiaries` when posting, 50% of each curated post’s rewards will go to the original content creator.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

Enjoy the vote and reward!

I think you've found a pretty good compromise to the problem of resteeming. This. This exact format for adding commentary while providing a link to the original content.

I’m pretty OK with this solution, then again for me it’s not a new thing. I’ve done that for eons. Just a hassle with account management.

Edit: Still hoping for beneficiary integration in the UI, failing to convince myself to use steemwhales.

So would you use a portion of your projected earnings off the post to buy an upvote for the original author?

Huh?

I write, try to provide extra visibility and also add value.

You ask if I would consider paying for doing such? How many publishers bring visibility and even consider sharing parts of their proceeds.

Also: bots.

I didn't know what steemwhales was, so I took a random guess instead of taking the 3 seconds to google and click a link.

Steemwhales does have a post editor which has an option to set beneficiary. But currently I’m posting mostly via busy, so that would be a bonus which I have to sacrifice and thus also hurt the long term growth of this/my account.

Here’s hoping @netuoso will integrate it soonish on mspsteem. I then would use mspsteem rather than busy, and at the same time also support the MSP community, thanks to the 5% beneficiary mspsteem takes.

Good post.

So flattered. Thank you for the mention. You are so right that resteems sans commentary appear as implicit endorsements. Checking out your other accounts - I didn't even know about Busy.org!