While I tend not to tumbl content from outside Steem here, this TC guest contribution reminded me of two Steemians I’ve been reading for quite some time. So I’m going to leave this here for them, they are @krnel and @tarazkp. Combined with one of my preferred memes about nowadays society.
Too often we talk about governments and MSM having an agenda, but in last decade the danger has grown exponentially and reached also those who otherwise think that even the daily news is too challenging for their little mindset them and who generally resort to even lower level forms of interaction, discovery and socializing: the internet and in this era that means always more mobile apps. Apps niches mostly dominated by few players and no I’m not talking about the CandyCrushes, Egg Inc and other games but Social Media and Co.
Apps, platforms always more powered by algorithms defining what we get to see, based on our own conscious or not so conscious input. Or based on what the delivery drone saw.
In short, the way we go about our lives mimics the way we engage with the Internet. Algorithms are an easy way out, because they allow us to take the messiness of human life, the tangled web of relationships and potential matches, and do one of two things: Apply a clear, algorithmic framework to deal with it, or just let the actual algorithm make the choice for us. We’re forced to adapt to and work around algorithms, rather than use technology on our terms.
Of course, TechCrunch being TechCrunch the article doesn’t go too in-depth but combined with the ever wider proliferation of mobile apps, at always younger ages and definitely in demographics where time and money come at a premium, algos are ever more defining what our offspring (read: yours, I have none that I’m aware of) gets to see and eventually also learns.
But as we adopt programming language, code, and algorithms as part of our own thinking, are human nature and artificial intelligence merging into one? We’re used to think of AI as an external force, something we have little control over. What if the most immediate threat of AI is less about robots taking over the world, and more about technology becoming more embedded into our consciousness and subjectivity?
In the same way that smartphones became extensions of our senses and our bodies, as Marshall McLuhan might say, algorithms are essentially becoming extensions of our thoughts. But what do we do when when they replace the very qualities that make us human?
Or about what we don’t get to see. Not merely the filter bubble danger but also the lack of discovery. I recall having had this discussion with a mother of 4 not that long ago and trying to explain her that nobody denies the good of Facebook when it comes to staying connected, especially with older contacts, but the risk is about what is withheld from one’s feed.
Chunnel vision, constant validation of one’s own thinking, and lack of challenging opposing views.
Obviously, I understand the irony of forwarding that TC article to @krnel, @tarazkp, and #informationwar since I’m doing nothing else than preaching to the choir within our own little echo chamber, yet I thought it important to also highlight the danger of always more innocent souls and minds being developed by AI’s and algos’ selections of what they get to see.
When we operate within the bubble of distraction that technology creates around us, and when our social media feeds consist of people who think just like us, how can we expect social change? What ends up happening is we operate exactly as the algorithm intended us to. The alternative is questioning the status quo, analyzing the facts and arriving at our own conclusions. But no one has time for that. So we become cogs in the Facebook machine, more susceptible to propaganda, blissfully unaware of the algorithm at work–and of all the ways in which it has inserted itself into our thought processes.
How will we achieve those people to become woke? How will we protect children and young adolescents from being not only brainwashed by the [editorial] agendas of the MSM and the FUD machines but also by the constant drive for time on site and perpetual tweaking of the addictive elements to make sure users, no matter which age, have no desire to leave?
Source: TechCrunch: Are Algorithms Hacking Our Minds
Hey there, this is @FknMayhem's alt account.
Here I mostly tumbl (resteem with added commentary and attitude or snark, a form of advanced curation Steem doesn't offer), zapp, post to forums, and submit other miscellaneous mischief. The latter which may or may not include more personal content. There may be days it can be noisy around here, follow at your own risk. Alternatively, follow my attempts at more in-depth own content on my main account, @FknMayhem. I am also on zeh Titter. Feel free to pitch me your worthy suggestions there. But make them worth my time, please. A SteemAuto curation trail can be joined here (must be logged in) to support and upvote all great content found and curated.
What did people do when they did not have computers? What information did they get?
People lived in smaller social circles. The social circles defined what information they got. The information they got from a central far-away source was mostly through television and newspaper media. There were 3 channels on the TV to get centralized information from. Newspapers were a little different but not THAT different. Churches told them what to believe and how to deal with their inner lives. In many communities, the beliefs were enforced through coercion by the elders. This is not good or bad, it is just how things worked.
People grew in their education by first going to local schools, then distant schools. Perhaps a child would go away for high school and meet foreigners with different ideas (very exotic). Then colleges. The information available at colleges came from professors and libraries. Ways of believing came from the college culture and social group.
What is different about the internet? We have a lot more choices of what information we can pay attention to and, in a sense, what we believe is now up to us. If we don't like the local cultish belief system, we can find other mind-communities on-line. The problem is that there may be nefarious organizing forces controlling the communities that we are not aware of. In fact, it is likely that there are nefarious forces because the internet is a faceless place and it is so easy to pretend that you are not harming people who you don't have to interact with. Facebook CEOs, politicians, other CEOs are insulated from the consequences of nefarious actions on communities. If people are hurt by their activities, they typically don't have to deal with it. They have enough money to build walls and security guards.
These are just some thoughts. My point is that we have a lot more options now in how we train our minds. I don't think that most people have the intelligence or filters to deal with the information. Smaller social groups and cultish local communities used to help deal with mind-training. Now, there are many holes to fall down and no local help available (given that the locals are in the same information-overload situation).
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
As I see it, there is not necessarily some Illuminati dictating each piece of the puzzle but rather a convergence of factors that are driving us into a pathway where we walk in the same direction with ever greater speed.
With each passing day, we are giving up our skills and deferring the decisions to all kinds of various algorithms/machines. These compete with not only our current skills but our ability to develop more in the future and it is happening at an ever younger age.
People put their babies and toddlers on tablets and phones with 'educational' games without considering that it is a man-made maze with zero randomization. The child may learn some targeted skill sets but at the loss of the various other skills that would be developed if in a natural environment. In the end, we have children who are low creatives and, all the same.
The various complex problems of the future will take diversity of thought to solve but, we are training people to all think the same. Essentially, it is everyone wearing communist grey of the mind.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
For now my best answer is to focus on myself. I figure that there's an endless amount of work to do on me, breaking down my own misconceptions and learning new things.
For example this week I was watching lots of YouTube content about mathematics and re-discovering a love for that. It made me think about the fundamental skills I don't have, in math and biology and some other areas, and how I could totally learn those things. Then I'd have the building blocks to think better about things I care about like health / longevity, technology, and even music.
None of that would be possible if I was spending hours on the news... although for me it's less risky with news, and more about podcasts. I realized that Joe Rogan and stuff like that, though fun, is basically my version of CNN - its not fact checked, its mostly just a way to spend time and relax. We all have our "junk food" information and we gotta be vigilant.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Joe Rogan has some classic moments that are worth anyones time, Paul Stamets mushrooms talk is a good one. My favourite has to be The one with Dorian Yates. He talks some really good sense, especially in regard to your first part about self development and focus. This guy was Mr Olympia. Check it out.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
One step at a time. Achievable (mini) goals which allow one to often record “victories” and thus progress.
We should never try to tackle too much at once, especially because lack of focus will make otherwise already uncomfortable change even more disorienting and that also because of lack of “victories”. Progress needs to be able to be tracked.
I think you’ve done very well in the months I’ve read you. Keep up with the good work.
My junk food is the Guardian, especially the so-called BTL (Below the Line) comments section. There’s some absolute smartasses in there who would make a true mint if the Guardian integrated a SMT setup. Which I wouldn’t mind either as I occasionally have quite upvoted comments as well. 😬
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

Relevance: Algorithms
Our Purpose
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Highly rEsteemed!
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit