FLAT EARTH WITH TWO CELESTIAL POLES PROBLEM AND SOLUTION
Ok, lets be logical. Here are my facts and working theory:
The earth is flat and stationary. Oceans do not bend and are flat. World is 70% water. Those are facts. The Sun and Rahu (solar eclipse) as well Moon and Ketu (lunar eclipse) are local, Sun and Moon emit their own light, albeit Moon is getting charged by the Sun, with their respective orbits at about 3,500 miles from earth. The dome around Antarctic ring at 80° is reported by encyclopedia Britanica (1959 edition) to be 13,000 feet, while around New Mexico is around 80,000 feet, according to the independent rocket launches, with over North Pole calculated by some as high as 385,000 feet. Then supposedly there are other domes separating other rings from each other, including one over North Pole.
The Polaris is central North star around which a disk of stars, as well as the planets, are rotating in perfect circles without change for thousands of years. The length of their light trails indicates equal distance from the earth. The Atlantis civilization must have copied the concentric rings design of its city from the larger structure of the world they knew about. It is made out of the concentric rings of ice and liquids, ours being the second inner ring consisting mainly of salt water, whereas other rings contain fresh water, milk, or honey etc according to old Hindu cosmology.
SOUTH CELESTIAL POLE IS FLAT EARTH PROBLEM
Wikipedia: Currently, there is no South Star as useful as Polaris, the so-called North Star. Polaris Australis (Sigma Octantis) is the closest naked-eye star to the south celestial pole, but at apparent magnitude 5.47 it is barely visible on a clear night, making it unusable for navigational purposes. It is a yellow giant 294 light years from Earth. Its angular separation from the pole is about 1° (as of 2000).
The Southern Cross constellation functions as an approximate southern pole constellation, by pointing to where a southern pole star would be. At the equator, it is possible to see both Polaris and the Southern Cross. The celestial south pole is moving toward the Southern Cross, which has pointed to the south pole for the last 2000 years or so. As a consequence, the constellation is no longer visible from subtropical northern latitudes, as it was in the time of the ancient Greeks.
SOLUTION
So, how can it work? Since the last outer ring is enclosed in the Cosmic Egg shell, the surface of it around the outer ice wall perimeter must be reflective mirror with a gap, mind the gap, between the last outer ice wall ring and the outer Cosmic Egg shell, wide enough to reflect the disk of stars spinning below around the dim South Pole star, aka the real Pluto.
It would make sense that as above so is below, that around both celestial poles would be spinning two wheels of stars, aka galaxies, the Milky Way around North Pole and another galaxy of stars rotating below the ground whose reflection is visible south of the equator. Hence why the Southern Pole stars are much dimmer and are rhus useless for navigation, needing to rely on near by constellations, such as the Southern Cross.
That's the only ligical explination I can give at this point of my research. Obviously it is ongoing., and I do have in mind the effect caused by an observation. Cat in the box. Particle and wave at the same time. Holographic reality of sorts constantly being consciously, subconsciously, and unconsciously generated and experienced in spacetime continuum.
God is truth, and the truth will set you free.
Comments:
"All I can say is that we live a simulation matrix inside a cell that is electromagnetic. All center of a EM field is not the north, it's the inertia point of the EM field, Ken Wheeler's work is showing us that in every experience he made. We need two magnetic poles, one is positive and the other one negative the center is neutral where energy comes out and go's back in, many names are attributed to this, black whole, singularity, inertia, zero point energy etc... If people would understand how a electromagnetic energy field work, no one would ever say that the center is the north or what so ever." Yannick Comte
AB: I am talking about how to explain seeing South Pole rotation of the stars from fe perspective. Obviously the EM force is a major player and my model is accounting for it with North being magnetic centre, mount Miru what not, which is your positive polarity while the ice ring of Antarctica is negatively charged, like a speaker magnet, with the positively charged iron core running right through it at 90° to the other side.
Alternatively, the bar magnet is as you have described, runs vertically as the Miru Mout, with its top charged positively and the bottom, on the other side of the FE is charged negatively, with the ice rings forming around the magmatic field, forming cross section rings. I like this idea better. Something to ponder and experiment with.
Thus it corresponds to the reports about the opening around the North Pole were the oceans drain with the iron mountain raising high in the middle of the great chasm. Closer to the NP the sound gets deafening and the currents are to violent for even the military grade ships to begin the approach.
The point of my post was to propose the potential design of the electromagnetic flat world we live in to explain how can the Southern sky and the centre of it, however dim, be seen South of the equator from different continents at the same time, which would not work on fe with only NP as the celestial centre, regardless of the electromagnetic reasons, hence why am trying to explain the visible reality of the Southern sky as perceived from FE point of view by suggesting that it is reflected from below by the mirror like surface of the outer shell of the Cosmic Egg. Otherwise I can't explain the visible Southern circle of stars around the dark South Celestial centre, magnetic and what not, but visible nonetheless and conventional FE model does not fit.
♡
_ \ \ | / / _