I found the discussion under the video far more interesting, this pwerson ended all sensible conversation:
+Hendrik-jan Monshouwer - If you want 'nitty picky' which twilight do you mean - civilian, nautical or astronomical?
Venus was amazingly bright and relatively high in the sky, even after astronomical twilight, early this year in January. Mercury, I think, is too close to the Sun for it to be easily, if at all, observed after astronomical twilight.
By the way, these observations fit the heliocentric model, considering planets orbit more or less along the plane of the ecliptic. I can bring up Stellarium and go to any location, date and time and check its predictions against what is actually in the sky, and guess what? It's correct 100% of the time and its calculations are based on the heliocentric model.
The fact of the matter is until FETs actually develop a comprehensive and consistent FET model of the universe (you know, 'draw it out') that makes predictions that can be tested against reality there really is nothing to discuss.
Oh, and while we're talking about 'magically woven' what exactly in FET explains how the Sun & Moon stay up? How about what makes them move across the sky? What powers the Sun? I can go on and on because FET has no - zero, nada, nil, zilch - physics or maths behind its magical workings.
The observations are not exclusive to the heliocentric model.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Is that what you got from that post? That it somehow said that the observations are exclusive to the heliocentric model?
Why and how?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Your evidence of a spinning ball please? :)
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
The shadow of the earth on the moon during a lunar eclipse plus various experiments that have been done demonstrating optically or otherwise angle of movement and speed. The Omega 3-6-9 Ratios and all other phenomena that resolves around the equator as distinct from moving away from the equator. The predictive power of the "spinning ball" model, the numerous people who are involved with space, and the lack of evidence to the contrary. The "Spinning Ball" A, the moon, and "Spinning Ball" B, the sun, the numerous moons and the planets in our immediate vicinity, The horizon, sun set and sun rise, circumnavigation and satellite imagery, gigabites upon gigabytes of pixels, of galaxies and galaxies, of planets, moons and even ufos. Also the fact that there isn't one picture of flat earth, not one picture of the 200 foot wall of ice from space, showing conclusively the wall, which would be the single evidence required, and considering there are drones, there is no reason why people who really believe their observations are correct, that there is an endless wall of ice encircling us, why haven't they provided one shred of evidence , someone in Argentina flying to and from Argentina should be able to confirm the endless wall of ice with one photo. A grand conspiracy, in spite of all the different facts that are explained by heliocentric model.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
Which experiments exactly?
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
You were linked one of the experiments, there are others:
http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Sagnac/SagnacEarth.html
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit
I wonder, do you have nothing to say about all the other reasons why its a sphere, or you think that you can cast doubt with one question and hope to dismiss the plethora of reasons I gave, good luck.
Downvoting a post can decrease pending rewards and make it less visible. Common reasons:
Submit