LMAO. I gave you three ways that are observable, measurable, repeatable, falsifiable, and predictable that you, yourself, can measure the distance to the moon and you have to call me a troll because it destroys your little fantasy!

Wow, just wow.

So, can you explain why those three experiments that all get a similar result within a small margin of error are incorrect? Please enlighten US on the best way to measure the distance to the moon... which only changes size by about 2%... which would be impossible if it were close and small, by the way. Or do you just not care that your claims are impossible because you prefer fantasy to observable reality?